I understand what you're saying, but it still doesn't make sense to hold the success or failure against one player in a game that consists of a 53 man team and multiple coaches.
Who is doing that? I do realize that the cowboys have holes at other places, but I also realize that will always be the case here in Dallas, since the GM is never going to get fired. They can draft talent, and the Cowboys had, had talent during the past two decades, at various points of time, but they don't plan for depth. That was the difference between the teams Romo led and Eli Manning led for instance. Is that ever going to change? Are we ever going to have a Head Coach who isn't a puppet again, who will prepare his team for the playoff, keep them focused, when things start to go wrong, calm the players and get them back on track?
Various positions on the team, can have on the field leadership. Quarterback is a leadership position, and if the coaches fail to do their job, unfortunately it falls on the team leaders to lead on the field. If the current on the field leaders of the team haven't produced for a decade, why should I think they are going to produce this year?
Because if thats the case, Matthew Stafford looks really bad as a quarterback for 12 years until he got with a greatly built Rams team.
Am I saying that Dak couldn't go to another team that is better run than the Cowboys and win, where he has less responsibilities? I'm expressing my doubts that he can win in the current system that he is in, and my concerns are not what is best for Dak but what is best for the team, find someone at his position who is a better on the field leader. A Decade and all we have is 2-5, it is like Parcels says, at the end of the day you are what your record says you are.
Its also looks bad that quarterbacks like Kaepernick got to a Superbowl and Josh Allen hasn't and people will say Allen is better than Kaepernick.
Kaepernick was in a system that could get him to a superbowl, not under a puppet coaching staff. When Aikman played under Switzer, he said he had to take over some of the duties that used to be Jimmie's and be the bad guy when he was used to playing the good cop.
It looks bad when quarterbacks like Dilfer, Brad Johnson, Foles, etc can win Superbowls and quarterbacks much better than them can't.
Again, this is only according to what you stated.
No it is not according to what I stated. It is the thing you love to constantly bring up, like people are hearing it for the first time. The difference is: those teams were build to win with quarterbacks like those. I'm not sure that Dak is better than Foles either as opposed to the other two. I'm not saying that if you stuck Dak on a well run organization like the Ravens had been during his time here, that he couldn't find success. I'm saying that after a decade here, the coaching isn't going to change, the depth of the team isn't going to change, since the cowboys got talent but not depth usually. Dak is a good regular season quarterback, but a terrible playoffs quarterback who has been just as responsible for making mistakes during the playoffs as his teammates have. The cowboys never kick it up a notch and play playoff football. We don't have on the field leaders who calm the troops and get them back on the page. After a decade here, it is pretty obvious that he does not get mad if things are going wrong in a big playoff game, and gets the people he is leading back on the same page and focused. Instead, he make mistakes himself during those games and is as flustered as the people around him.