basel90
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,036
- Reaction score
- 4,433
Absurd to claim this. Dak destroyed the careers of many receivers dating back to dez.Absurdity all around.
Amari had his best seasons with Dak. He's 18th in the league in receiving yards this year without Dak. Same player he's always been, fails to show up in road games.
Now, go look up Lamb's stats in games with Dak vs. without Dak and let me know what you find.
To make this argument simple , and to compare apples to apples, have you seen Tannehil throwing at Green Bay the week after Dallas's loss with far less receiver and run game talent than dak? The limitations of Dak are all very clear. Tannehil also cost 25 mil less per year than dak. there is a difference between a losing QB and a winning one. Tennehil led his team to a win by 2 TDs and Dak sputtered , threw interceptions and lost . The Dak limitations are all clear out there.