khiladi
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 36,811
- Reaction score
- 37,214
No, you're missing the point. I'm saying that throughout Romo's early years (2006-2009), he hasn't had to play a stretch of games where they were breaking in multiple new starters like the Cowboys have had to do this year at RT, LG, and whoever is filling in for Tyron. Flozell, Gurode, Davis, and Colombo had lots of experience together. People are blaming Dak for not being great behind this current group of OL and I'm saying to relax because Romo himself had games where he struggled behind a better OL than what Dak has had vs. Atlanta and Philly. Romo never had a game where Flozell wasn't protecting his blindside...that makes a huge difference. The OL then was not as good as the OL in 2014-2016. But the OL in 2017, even with Tyron healthy, is not as good as the one we've seen with Leary and Free. And then with Tyron injured, it's not even on par with the 06-09 OL.
What does Davis being a bust at Arizona playing OT have to do with how he played in Dallas? He was good playing inside. 3x Pro Bowl and 1x All Pro. Gurode is dumb but made the Pro Bowl 5 times and All Pro in 2009? Yeah...a bunch of scrubs Aaron Rodgers and Russell Wilson have made their OL look way better than they really are the past 3 years yet how many Pro Bowls and All Pro teams have their OL made?
Let's take a look at the numbers of sacks given up during that span in relation to the rest of the league's sack totals:
2006: 37 (16th/23)
2007: 25 (8th/27)
2008: 31 (13th/28)
2009: 34 (12th/24)
Not great but definitely not terrible or close to being the worst.
Yes, Romo's OL got pretty bad from 2010-2013 but by that point, he was also an experienced QB. The point of this topic is to show that Romo had games like what Dak has had while he was inexperienced too. People want Dak to put the team on his back behind this currently bad OL while also not even fully polished as a QB yet.
That’s an awful defense of your point..
1. Your argument was that the OL player together with stability before Romo got there. That’s wrong.. Romo started the very same year four of the five bums started here. Dak had an OL that played together a minimum of three years together adding Martin, who played with them 2.
2. Leonard Davis was moved around in Arizona and was a bust. The fact your using Pro Bowls as indicators of great performances is comical, considering it’s a popularity contest. Part of the selection process is done by FANS.
3. Those numbers are mid-tier numbers WITH Romo and corroborates exactly what I was saying. They couldn’t RUN BLOCK worth anything and their only ‘remaining’ salvation was a middle of the pack sack totals, BECAUSE Romo was back there.
4. 2010 was when Jason Garrett completely took over as HC and was calling the plays prior. And when he got total control it sucked even more, while Dak doesn’t even have to deal with that since Linehan is control.
The whole point is your trying to put this OL which is considered top three in the league, even with its current flaws, as equivalent to that group that was a joke to defend Dak. Morris still ran the ball well. Dak’s first year the OL allowed lower 20s in terms of sacks and they’ve been producing 1000 yard rushers going back years.
The line-play wasn’t even bad last game.
Last edited: