Dak could not have done what Rodgers just did

[Aulac]

Lots of post here compare Dak to Manning, Brady, and paint Dak as an MVP front-runner. I like to share a different perspective.

Rodgers missing his top 3 receivers, 3 O-line man including David Bakhtiari, and his defensive coordinator--went into Arizona and beat the hottest team in football. That game is the definition of a QB doing more with less. That is a true MVP caliber QB and that someone who should be pay 40 millions a year.

Is that Dak? Can Dak do what Rodgers just did? Has Dak ever won against the best team in the league while being significantly undermanned? If we didn't have Lamb, Cooper, Gallup, missing 3 O-lineman, no Dan Quinn, and a running game that not as good as Zeke/Pollard, would we have beaten the Cardinals in their home? Rodgers has only thrown one pick this year, while Dak threw a pick against the lowly Giants.

Dak does "enough" for this team to win games because our roster is stack. He has only beaten the worst team in the league (Lions, Falcons, Giants, Eagles), without a running game in his entire career. He has not even beaten a single average team when the running game is absent.

Dak is not an MVP front-runner but he is in the conversation. Put any other top 10 QB on this team and they would do the same or better; Dalton is a backup, not a starter. Dak is not a top 5 QB but he is a fringe top 10 QB who look better thanks to the talent on this team and our division. I do think we have the #1 overall rosters with few flaw while having a decent amount of depth. Depth that team like the Rams, Cardinals, Bucs, Packers, and others don't have.

 

[Vegas_Cowboy]

 

[Doomsday]

I don't know I think he could pass for 180 yards with the run game and defense playing like Green Bay's did on Thursday night. All the praise seems to be going to Rodgers but the truth is the Packers as a whole played a heck of a game in all 3 phases.

 

[PAPPYDOG]

Lots of post here compare Dak to Manning, Brady, and paint Dak as an MVP front-runner. I like to share a different perspective.

Rodgers missing his top 3 receivers, 3 O-line man including David Bakhtiari, and his defensive coordinator--went into Arizona and beat the hottest team in football. That game is the definition of a QB doing more with less. That is a true MVP caliber QB and that someone who should be pay 40 millions a year.

Is that Dak? Can Dak do what Rodgers just did? Has Dak ever won against the best team in the league while being significantly undermanned? If we didn't have Lamb, Cooper, Gallup, missing 3 O-lineman, no Dan Quinn, and a running game that not as good as Zeke/Pollard, would we have beaten the Cardinals in their home? Rodgers has only thrown one pick this year, while Dak threw a pick against the lowly Giants.

Dak does "enough" for this team to win games because our roster is stack. He has only beaten the worst team in the league (Lions, Falcons, Giants, Eagles), without a running game in his entire career. He has not even beaten a single average team when the running game is absent.

Dak is not an MVP front-runner but he is in the conversation. Put any other top 10 QB on this team and they would do the same or better; Dalton is a backup, not a starter. Dak is not a top 5 QB but he is a fringe top 10 QB who look better thanks to the talent on this team and our division. I do think we have the #1 overall rosters with few flaw while having a decent amount of depth. Depth that team like the Rams, Cardinals, Bucs, Packers, and others don't have.

Comparing Dak to Rodgers and Brady is Ludicrous!
A glorified massively overpaid "Bus Driver"...enough said!

 

[Cowpolk]

Rogers got lucky And WWWWAAAAHHHHH

 

[blueblood70]

Lots of post here compare Dak to Manning, Brady, and paint Dak as an MVP front-runner. I like to share a different perspective.

Rodgers missing his top 3 receivers, 3 O-line man including David Bakhtiari, and his defensive coordinator--went into Arizona and beat the hottest team in football. That game is the definition of a QB doing more with less. That is a true MVP caliber QB and that someone who should be pay 40 millions a year.

Is that Dak? Can Dak do what Rodgers just did? Has Dak ever won against the best team in the league while being significantly undermanned? If we didn't have Lamb, Cooper, Gallup, missing 3 O-lineman, no Dan Quinn, and a running game that not as good as Zeke/Pollard, would we have beaten the Cardinals in their home? Rodgers has only thrown one pick this year, while Dak threw a pick against the lowly Giants.

Dak does "enough" for this team to win games because our roster is stack. He has only beaten the worst team in the league (Lions, Falcons, Giants, Eagles), without a running game in his entire career. He has not even beaten a single average team when the running game is absent.

Dak is not an MVP front-runner but he is in the conversation. Put any other top 10 QB on this team and they would do the same or better; Dalton is a backup, not a starter. Dak is not a top 5 QB but he is a fringe top 10 QB who look better thanks to the talent on this team and our division. I do think we have the #1 overall rosters with few flaw while having a decent amount of depth. Depth that team like the Rams, Cardinals, Bucs, Packers, and others don't have.

ahh the haters resurface. Lmao

so??

 

[lqmac1]

He literally **** on that performance against Bill Belichick his last time out. At this point, y’all just need to accept that Fields is the starter and your boy is on the bench in Chicago. Y’all are starting to sound dumber by the minute. Give it up already!

 

[LucaBrasi]

Arod is great for sure, but I think Dak would have done ok in a game where the ground game produced 155 rush yards, and drives of 4 plays for 0 yards produced a field goal, and 5 plays for 14 yards produced a td due to Arizona turnovers.

 

[ShortRound]

@Reality Can we get a beating a dead horse emoji?

 

[thunderpimp91]

Aaron Rodgers threw for a buck eighty. I’m not here to disrespect a legend but the packers won that game. The defense that kept kyler in check all game and forced turnovers won that game. The RBs getting 150+ on the ground won that game.

you could have easily swapped out Rodgers for dak and had the same outcome. Blake bortles would have had a shot at the W with how the packers played that game.

 

[Batman1980]

Comparing Dak to Rodgers and Brady is Ludicrous!
A glorified massively overpaid "Bus Driver"...enough said!

Kirk Cousins is a glorified massively overpaid "Bus Driver". You think it's all the supporting pieces? If Rush starts tomorrow, you will most likely see why having the right pieces isn't enough. You need the right driver as well.

 

[Zman5]

You are right. Dak can't make A.J Green miss the play and not turnaround for the ball. That A. Rodger is a wizard and can even control opponent's WR's thoughts.

 

[Aulac]

He literally **** on that performance against Bill Belichick his last time out. At this point, y’all just need to accept that Fields is the starter and your boy is on the bench in Chicago. Y’all are starting to sound dumber by the minute. Give it up already!

It amazes me that the moment someone give a different perspective on Dak, they are label a non-Cowboys fan. Talk about gas-lighting. Fields is one of the worst QB I have ever seen, like how you only score 3 points against the Bucs secondary and not even in garbage time? I knew Fields was a bust before he even got drafted. Like he not a first round talent at all, 2nd round at the earliest. Every team pasted on him but the sorry Bears franchise that can evaluate talent. It's funny cause Jake Cutler is still the Bears best QB in the SB era.

 

[stilltheguru]

So packers didnt have success running the ball? Wth does running game not as good as zeke and pollard mean? If zeke and pollard combine every game for what Jones and Dillon did and the defense gets THREE turnovers yes Dak could win. Yall are so weird

 

[blueblood70]

You are right. Dak can't make A.J Green miss the play and not turnaround for the ball. That A. Rodger is a wizard and can even control opponent's WR's thoughts.

lol right he yelled ajs way before the snap and this is what AJ saw..

 

[Aulac]

You are right. Dak can't make A.J Green miss the play and not turnaround for the ball. That A. Rodger is a wizard and can even control opponent's WR's thoughts.

Murray choking get hidden by that play. Murray should be blowing out the Packers, not needing to have a game winner to beat them. Murray was atrocious in this game. It amaze me that the media isn't even blaming Murray for the miscommunication. Like sure, it mostly Green fault, but miscommunication is a two-way street.

 

[Seth5545]

@Reality Can we get a beating a dead horse emoji?

 

[John813]

To be fair Rodgers had Jaylon Smith as a hype man.

 

[lqmac1]

It amazes me that the moment someone give a different perspective on Dak, they are label a non-Cowboys fan. Talk about gas-lighting. Fields is one of the worst QB I have ever seen, like how you only score 3 points against the Bucs secondary and not even in garbage time? I knew Fields was a bust before he even got drafted. Like he not a first round talent at all, 2nd round at the earliest. Every team pasted on him but the sorry Bears franchise that can evaluate talent. It's funny cause Jake Cutler is still the Bears best QB in the SB era.

That went over your head, but it was expected just by your perspective on Dak. You're not the sharpest!

Who labeled you a “non-Cowboys fan”?

Panties seem to be in a bunch, kid!

 

[Aulac]

So packers didnt have success running the ball? Wth does running game not as good as zeke and pollard mean? If zeke and pollard combine every game for what Jones and Dillon did and the defense gets THREE turnovers yes Dak could win. Yall are so weird

Now show me a game that has happen? Show me a game that Dak has won with no receivers against the #1 team in the league. Hypothetical just doesn't cut it, when history prove otherwise.