Dak could not have done what Rodgers just did

Aulac

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,048
Reaction score
713
I will Venmo you $1000 if you can show me where I called you a “non-Cowboys fan”.

A non-knowledgeable Cowboys fan? Easily. 100%! Without a shadow of a doubt.

Its what happen when you have work on Sunday, at least I can watch them tomorrow since it in the evening. With that said, I hope Dak play, like I better not be stuck watching Rush play in Primetime. Just my luck, whoope do!

P.S I have only missed two Cowboys game this year, all due to work. Otherwise I watch them play at work while multi-tasking.
 

Aulac

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,048
Reaction score
713
Tell us how you really feel................Ha-haaaa! Actually, the Packers should blown out the Cards, but they didn't. The way the game played out, the Packers were dam lucky to come out on top because the Cards finally found their game and if it weren't for that horrible route running from Green the Cards had at least two more plays to either score a winning TD or kick a game tying field goal. If the game went into OT I believe the Cards would of pulled that game out....

How about Murray choking the entire game? Cards should have blown out the Packers. Rodgers had no receiver this game. If he did, Packers would have blown out the Cards and Murray would be faking his injury by the end of the 3rd quarter. Oh he has a sprain ankle right? Boo Hoo!
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,485
Reaction score
76,336
Aaron shouldn't have been in that position in the first place. The Cardinals should have blown out the Packers. And Jones touchdown shouldn't have been reverse. With that said, FTP because the Packers get so many ref's call, but this game the ref actually tried to screw Green Bay, which kind of impress me. Is Kyler the NFL new golden boy?
Cardinals had a bad game. How did you feel about the Saints beating the Packers by 40 points week 1?
 

Aulac

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,048
Reaction score
713
Dude, you're the only one on this thread with an agenda. You made a statement without having any definitive proof that you're right. Your whole goal on this forum is to discredit Dak. We all know that. Posters who disagree with your statement have pointed out why it is wrong. Be a man and accept defeat

So you are saying Dak is not overpaid, and that he actually worth 40 millions...I mean 73 millions this year? I wouldn't have stop supporting Dak if he was pay his real value.
 

SSoup

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,087
Reaction score
1,194
The Packers' defense held an elite offense and Kyler Murray to 0 passing TDs while picking off 2 passes and limiting him to a passer rating of 67. They won it for the Packers on a night when their weapons were absent. If Dak could've waved a magic wand in 2017 or 2018 to magically make our defense win games for us while all our weapons were broken down or gone, he would have.

The rare instances when Dak has stooped to play like Rodgers did this week (posting bad yardage amounts, a mediocre completion percentage, and a dismal Yards Per Attempt because he's throwing short and being overly careful), you people wanted to lynch Dak.
 

Aulac

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,048
Reaction score
713
Cardinals had a bad game. How did you feel about the Saints beating the Packers by 40 points week 1?

That was a fluke and I believe Rodgers purposely lost that game to make a statement to the Packers organization. I have no love lost for the Packers, but drafting Love was one of the dumbest thing they could have ever done. Packers probably win it all last year if they had drafted Rodgers a receiver or have gotten Will Fuller. Say what you want about Jerry, but he put a real team around Dak.
 

sjmike

Well-Known Member
Messages
650
Reaction score
1,226
So you are saying Dak is not overpaid, and that he actually worth 40 millions...I mean 73 millions this year? I wouldn't have stop supporting Dak if he was pay his real value.
That's the price of doing business in the NFL. Your suggestion would be to have let him go to someone that would pay him and roll with Andy Dalton? What do you think our record would be in that case?
 

Hardline

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,248
Reaction score
37,131
Lots of post here compare Dak to Manning, Brady, and paint Dak as an MVP front-runner. I like to share a different perspective.

Rodgers missing his top 3 receivers, 3 O-line man including David Bakhtiari, and his defensive coordinator--went into Arizona and beat the hottest team in football. That game is the definition of a QB doing more with less. That is a true MVP caliber QB and that someone who should be pay 40 millions a year.

Is that Dak? Can Dak do what Rodgers just did? Has Dak ever won against the best team in the league while being significantly undermanned? If we didn't have Lamb, Cooper, Gallup, missing 3 O-lineman, no Dan Quinn, and a running game that not as good as Zeke/Pollard, would we have beaten the Cardinals in their home? Rodgers has only thrown one pick this year, while Dak threw a pick against the lowly Giants.

Dak does "enough" for this team to win games because our roster is stack. He has only beaten the worst team in the league (Lions, Falcons, Giants, Eagles), without a running game in his entire career. He has not even beaten a single average team when the running game is absent.

Dak is not an MVP front-runner but he is in the conversation. Put any other top 10 QB on this team and they would do the same or better; Dalton is a backup, not a starter. Dak is not a top 5 QB but he is a fringe top 10 QB who look better thanks to the talent on this team and our division. I do think we have the #1 overall rosters with few flaw while having a decent amount of depth. Depth that team like the Rams, Cardinals, Bucs, Packers, and others don't have.

You are more right than wrong.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,580
Reaction score
85,998
Everything we knew about Dak prior to this season needs to be thrown out the window.

He is playing at an elite level.

Some of the windows he is throwing the ball into with anticipation is just phenomenal.

The rope he threw against Tampa that hit Lamb right in his hands that he dropped was an amazing throw and he’s had several reads and throws this year that were just incredible.



Now if you want to say he’s not worth the money then I’m on your side all day because these QBs hold their teams hostage with these deals but Dallas put a great team on the field for at least 1 season and Dak is playing far and away the best football of his career.

He went from getting carried to actually carrying.
 

BotchedLobotomy

Wide Right
Messages
15,317
Reaction score
23,158
Lots of post here compare Dak to Manning, Brady, and paint Dak as an MVP front-runner. I like to share a different perspective.

Rodgers missing his top 3 receivers, 3 O-line man including David Bakhtiari, and his defensive coordinator--went into Arizona and beat the hottest team in football. That game is the definition of a QB doing more with less. That is a true MVP caliber QB and that someone who should be pay 40 millions a year.

Is that Dak? Can Dak do what Rodgers just did? Has Dak ever won against the best team in the league while being significantly undermanned? If we didn't have Lamb, Cooper, Gallup, missing 3 O-lineman, no Dan Quinn, and a running game that not as good as Zeke/Pollard, would we have beaten the Cardinals in their home? Rodgers has only thrown one pick this year, while Dak threw a pick against the lowly Giants.

Dak does "enough" for this team to win games because our roster is stack. He has only beaten the worst team in the league (Lions, Falcons, Giants, Eagles), without a running game in his entire career. He has not even beaten a single average team when the running game is absent.

Dak is not an MVP front-runner but he is in the conversation. Put any other top 10 QB on this team and they would do the same or better; Dalton is a backup, not a starter. Dak is not a top 5 QB but he is a fringe top 10 QB who look better thanks to the talent on this team and our division. I do think we have the #1 overall rosters with few flaw while having a decent amount of depth. Depth that team like the Rams, Cardinals, Bucs, Packers, and others don't have.
Another guy that can’t stand Dak being successful because it goes against his narrative
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,580
Reaction score
85,998
Another thing..

Cooper is injured..

Lamb is great but he can drop passes at times.

Wilson was our 4th string guy.

Schultz looks like a top 7 NFL TE and we all know he is a product of the system.

Gallup hasn’t played since the first half of week 1.


His best support has been the OL and Zeke + Pollard.
 

Aulac

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,048
Reaction score
713
That's the price of doing business in the NFL. Your suggestion would be to have let him go to someone that would pay him and roll with Andy Dalton? What do you think our record would be in that case?

I still stand by it. Why couldn't we have gone for Matt Stafford, Russell Wilson instead? Trading Dak would net us at least a first round pick and some change. The Lions would have gotten a decent Qb on their team, who would be much better than what Goff is doing right now. Stafford is rank #2 in the league when pressure, Dak is only middle of the pack. Wilson would be unstoppable with an excellent O-line.You need to take risk in the NFL if you want to win it all. We chose the safe option instead. We been playing it safe since I been a Cowboys fan and what has that net us?
 

Batman1980

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,917
Reaction score
11,571
Yes because handing a 27 year old quarterback $160 million for 4 seasons who's coming off a devastating ankle injury is so safe.
 
Top