FALSE NARRATIVE!! How are we to have substantive discussion about Dak when you create a negative context surrounding Dak's agent (CAA) and Dak?
Then you somehow project that Dak's agents (CAA) greed and Dak Contract will lose the lockeroom.
This is ridiculous...
CAA job is to get their clients the best deal. Did you have a problem with Romo's Contract in the past?...CAA is Romo's agent too.
By all accounts every player has kept out of Dak's Contract negotiations. Players don't get involved in teammates Contract negotiations. It's a code in the lockeroom. Yet somehow you've conjured up possible Dak resentment forth coming....
This is a great article! Thank you! How you exposed CAA greed and Dak resentment from the piece is amazing
You present a false narrative...
Where was all this tough talk when Dak was making $2M last season?
No, you add no discussion or point beyond Dak was receiving a lower rookie pay, when his current offer is top shelf...and again, the team is still building.
Try attempting some answers instead of substituting attitude and agenda...you saying Dak hasn't been offered a reasonable contract that would not be expanded upon by most other teams?
My point was Dak needs to seize the full set of potentials...your point is to insult and add agenda.
Now answer and don't run away from this...you stating that right now, in the middle of complete social chaos, the team doesn't need it's top leader?
Is that throwing crap as an excuse? I don't agree...
I pointed possible directions....and oh yea, they are real possibilities if not solved. I think they will be solved, but ignore the reality of everything that is involved and if not addressed while the rest of the team is growing, it then becomes a major hurdle to overcome. You don't?
This is when the whole team needs interaction.
You again stating that earning millions and having to work like all other rookies to reach a larger contract amount, justifies not being available as a team leader?
I pointed out real points that need to be fully developed right now...and some of the areas where growth is strongly showing. I have done this in several OP's posted, First, one has to focus upon possible directions. That include offensive line, receiver, and running back progress. Have you discussed here, just what some of that may be? I have. You above discussing what could be lost, if a team's leader doesn't participate in foundation building?
You then telling me that you just tell the new coach, and all the new players...don't worry, that Dak was a growing leader in the past? Sorry, get real again.
The team and coaches all need for Dak to be involved...right now. You can't grasp that concept?
Leave all your personally directed insult and agenda aside. There could have been a more complete discussion of the strengths, beyond agenda bending and substituting negative and quick fire excuses around.
Try talking some factual football here, and don't go looking for golden eggs that hide the real discussion involved.
As to stating that my agenda was negative, dry your nose up...it wasn't.