A good way to tell that someone does not know football, at anything beyond an elementary school level, is if they put Goff above Dak. No GM is going to do that. You will see that in a couple months when the annual survey of GMs, coaches, and executives comes out and they have Dak in the top 10 and Goff somewhere in the 13-18 range. The reason is that while Goff can look like a competent starter, he requires two conditions: absolutely no pressure and to be in a dome. If the pass rush gets to him he has been one of the 5 worst QBs in the NFL when pressured every single year of his career. Fortunately for the Lions they play in a dome and with a top 3 OLine so he can look passable for them but he is their weakest link on offense.
Meanwhile it seems like you are falling prey to a lot of the "more name than game" syndrome when you are talking about these QBs. Trevor Lawrence has played for 3 years and had one 8 game run where he looked like a good QB. Note I did not say great I said good. Most of his hype is that everyone called him a generational cant miss talent and people who say that are going to look for any opportunity to be right. To a similar degree we can same the same with Herbert. Now Herbert has played better than Lawrence but generally has been a solid tier 2 QB and has been since his rookie year. For Herbert he has been coaxing on that rookie year so people have not really noticed that he has not taken a step forward since then.