pitt33
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,153
- Reaction score
- 7,164
And how is Stroud 10?How is Josh Allen 4?
Thought he’d be higher
And how is Stroud 10?How is Josh Allen 4?
This is the thing though when it comes to the 49ers....you can't beat them one one guy. Because you better believe it's not gonna be one guy that beats you. Fred Warner is going to impact the game, CMAC will(though in their defense they seem to be handling him okBut a lot is on him. Again, take that interception he threw against the Giants. That's not on anyone but Dak there. And in those valleys, he tends to make way more dumb decisions like that than he does when he's in a groove.
Sure, he's not the ONLY reason we lost at San Fran last year or the year before. But he's had a heavy hand in it and the reality is he needs to play more like he has recently if the Cowboys want to make a run and in the last two playoffs, he's not been nearly as sharp consistently.
Yeah QBR I think is a better gauge when the season is over. Because right now its some looney stuff going on. Allen is too high and Stroud isn't high enough.And how is Stroud 10?
Thought he’d be higher
His QBR last night was 27.1. He will drop like a rockI have a feeling last night's game has not been entered into the computer yet. Allen is going to fall I think.
I'm not even sure the Giants duped him as much as the corner did. I think he free lanced on that play on a hunch and actually broke away from the scheme to end up where he did. Good play by him and the bodies between him and the receiver kept Dak from seeing it. It happens.. Every QB that has ever lived has thrown that particular type of interception. I don't see any reason to overreact to it. As long it only happens every 4th or 5th game I simply will not care.Giants duped him on that one pretty good.showed man and dropped in zone at last second but Im not sure even if they stayed man that wasnt picked looks like they had receiver blanketed
Poor completion %. He is only 61% on the year.And how is Stroud 10?
Thought he’d be higher
Stud rook right there, so hard to grab one.And how is Stroud 10?
Thought he’d be higher
Stroud will be top QB in this entire league in a very short time considering how many fear the time investment.Poor completion %. He is only 61% on the year.
And... you cared enough to open the thread and comment.Dak is 3rd in the NFL in Total QBR
And . . . .
Dak is 3rd in the NFL in Total QBR
And . . . .
1. Purdy
2. Mahomes
3. Dak
4. Allen
5. Herbert
6. Goff
7. Hurts
8. Tua
9. Cousins
10. Stroud
......
30. Zach Wilson (former #2 overall pick)
31. Bryce Young (#1 overall pick)
32. Tannehill (former #8 overall pick)
https://www.espn.com/nfl/qbr
MVP-level stuff from our guy lately.
Well, stats matter if you are Mahomes or Purdy, right?He had an interception against lowly giants. That's all we need to know. He also got sacked against eagles on the last drive. He should have compensated for Steele and he didn't.
And stats don't matter.
Mahomes and Purdy are pretty good. They deserve to be up there.
If you don't think Dak has had a major impact on our failures in the postseason the last couple of years, then you are just not being honest. He wasn't very good in those games. Yes, we can point to coaching as well and some other player failures but the QB is the most important position on the field and has the greatest impact on the outcomes of games.A lot? How much?
There's a common denominator here with regard to the success of this team, but you're only looking at the box score of the QB. Many fans do this and that's fine, but it's disingenuous. It's a team sport. When the Center plays his worst game against Philly, that's NOT what gets reported. When a WR drops a ball that hits his hands, they typically don't get the blame. Same with literally everything related to the offense. I brought up the O line for a reason.
There are so many examples that's it's bizarre it's ignored.
I think the thought is that he's just having that inconsistent bounce back year you often see from from guys that had major surgeries. Maybe they will be right or maybe Steele just isn't that good.I didn’t think it was that bad every game. For a 51 overall at Tackle, Steele and Tyron’s injury dude had to really drag their heels to bring it so far down. The only team with tackles under 46 is NYG….
I can’t imagine he’s your longterm future despite his contract with what you did to La’el
Sure but you can't also beat them if your QB isn't playing well either.This is the thing though when it comes to the 49ers....you can't beat them one one guy. Because you better believe it's not gonna be one guy that beats you. Fred Warner is going to impact the game, CMAC will(though in their defense they seem to be handling him ok
),Deebo, Aiyuk, Bosa.....there's 6 or 7 elite players who are going to make an a impact on a game. It feels like for us its half of that and most of them come on defense. It hasn't been a game this season where Pollard has been the best player on the field. Lamb has shown it. Dak at times has shown it. Ferguson has shown it at times. We need our playmakers to show it more consistently.
sorry if I wasn't being clear in my post. should have used a few emoji's. I was being sarcastic......Well, stats matter if you are Mahomes or Purdy, right?
BTW, being a down team doesn't mean never getting a single INT, and being a good QB doesn't mean never throwing one, even against a down team.
BTW, Josh Allen also threw an INT against the lowly Giants.
BTW, how was he supposed to "compensate" for Steele? Should he have thrown it away as soon as he touched it and never given the play a chance? When a play is called its success always depends on others doing their jobs, and that applies whether the QB is Dak, Mahomes, Purdy or anyone else?
Damn, I'm sorry. I actually debated with myself about whether you were being sarcastic, and even considered looking at some of your past posts to see if I could get a feel for you, then I talked myself out of it. Should have listened to my first instinctsorry if I wasn't being clear in my post. should have used a few emoji's. I was being sarcastic......
Didn't you say you wouldn't respond to me again?Terrible, Dak should #1. How come nobody respects him?
no problem. next time I will post an emojiDamn, I'm sorry. I actually debated with myself about whether you were being sarcastic, and even considered looking at some of your past posts to see if I could get a feel for you, then I talked myself out of it. Should have listened to my first instinct