Dak is nearly on an elite pace against winning teams!

johneric8

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,271
Reaction score
3,242
I get sick and tired of people forcing a narrative on this forum using their jaded feelings and their proverbial expert eye test. Facts are the facts up to this point regarding Dak, so let me preface my post by saying that I'm only providing factual evidence to crush the idiotic narratives that exist against our well deserving and about to be "PAID" franchise quarterback Dak Prescott.

From day 1 I've been one of his biggest fans, and I agree maybe to a fault at times, but for those of you that keep beating the drum that Dak can't win against good teams please enlighten me here a little bit. I will post the facts down below. All I'm saying is lots of guys whom aren't even on Dak's level in regards to winning percentage against good teams got paid so why not Dak? I mean, lets be frank here, Dak is on an elite pace against good teams, the numbers don't lie!

dak2.jpg

dak1.jpg
 
I get sick and tired of people forcing a narrative on this forum using their jaded feelings and their proverbial expert eye test. Facts are the facts up to this point regarding Dak, so let me preface my post by saying that I'm only providing factual evidence to crush the idiotic narratives that exist against our well deserving and about to be "PAID" franchise quarterback Dak Prescott.

From day 1 I've been one of his biggest fans, and I agree maybe to a fault at times, but for those of you that keep beating the drum that Dak can't win against good teams please enlighten me here a little bit. I will post the facts down below. All I'm saying is lots of guys whom aren't even on Dak's level in regards to winning percentage against good teams got paid so why not Dak? I mean, lets be frank here, Dak is on an elite pace against good teams, the numbers don't lie!

dak2.jpg

dak1.jpg

Its just a bunch of trolls that dont understand QB play or football. Just put up the stats that blow away their dumb theories, laugh, and move on. Kinda just like you did here.

But dont think you are ever going to change the mind of the "TRAIL OF TEARS". Nothing but a bunch of lost cry babies. Still havent gotten over Romo being passed over by Dak. And then being wrong for 4 years is just too much for them to stomach.
 
Another dumb statement. They beat the Eagles that won the NFC east and won the division and made the playoffs and beat the Rams that were 9-7.
Most of us wanted to lose last year so Garrett would finally get canned.. It isn't far fetched to believe that Dak was riding that train as well.. It's crazy to think that there are actually fans out there dumb enough to put the Eagles loss on Dak, it's laughable... The whole team gave up, they knew the team was about to implode.
 
Here we go again with the W/L stat.

Why is it so difficult for so many to understand the team concept?

I think you missed the point I'm trying to make! I log on everyday to only see fools on this forum say that Dak's stats are meaningless because he is bad against winning teams.. Well bro, I just posted some facts and it's should be respected.
 
I think you missed the point I'm trying to make! I log on everyday to only see fools on this forum say that Dak's stats are meaningless because he is bad against winning teams.. Well bro, I just posted some facts and it's should be respected.

I don't like it when people from either side use that stat. But, I think the ones using it from last year, are mostly getting back that all those that have tried to use it in support of Dak in earlier years (mostly from 2016).
 
Same record as Garrett the past 4 years. Guess we should have kept him. Guess Garrett was really good against winning teams.

It's pretty simple that anyone whom is semi-intelligent can comprehend. The stats I posted are the same ones used for Brees, and all the other Qb's listed. They live or die by their teams, coaches, ETC.. The bottom line is the facts don't line up with your defunct narrative. Keep on believing that you got Betty Davis eyes boss it's quite humorous..
 

Forum statistics

Threads
466,181
Messages
13,921,308
Members
23,795
Latest member
Derekbsenior
Back
Top