Dak is not my QB

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
84,716
Reaction score
77,149
They may have different styles...different strengths and weaknesses but their overall production and results were the same...they also had the same divided fan base. The same questions on whether they were strong leaders...or not. At the end of the day, when looking back at Cowboy QBs, their legacies will be viewed the same. Sometimes they had HOF players and a strong supporting cast, sometimes they had trash..for the most part they have had mediocre coaching (sans Parcells time) yet no matter the circumstances they couldn't get past the second round of the playoffs yet they literally own nearly every Cowboy record.
I’d say the only difference between Romo and Dak is one got coaching from Parcells and Sean Payton and the other was developed by Jason Garrett.
 

CowboyoWales

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,726
Reaction score
4,903
No need. My point was they were the same quarterback. Unlike you though I can’t blame Romo or Dak for 28 years ago….. I guess we could blame a 3 year old Dak or a middle school Romo.
Come again :huh: . My point is, stop trying to protect your pet cat with whataboutism with this he never had the opportunities.
Romo and Dak were the same, in that after the Rookie deal it was difficult to create an all round team they needed.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
84,716
Reaction score
77,149
Come again :huh: . My point is, stop trying to protect your pet cat with whataboutism with this he never had the opportunities.
Romo and Dak were the same, in that after the Rookie deal it was difficult to create an all round team they needed.
I verbatim said they were the same quarterback if you took that as whatabouttism then you have to take that up with yourself. I can’t coddle you guys feelings based on how you feel about Dak.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
84,716
Reaction score
77,149
Well you didn't, did you, not so subtly inferred Romo was assisted by better coaching, where as Dak was restricted.
I said they were the same quarterback. I brought up their coaching situations. Some people think highly of Garrett. Maybe you consider him to be the same caliber as Payton and Parcells. Who knows. One guy is in the Hall, the other is coaching and the the other can’t get a coaching job…..
 

CowboyoWales

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,726
Reaction score
4,903
I said they were the same quarterback. I brought up their coaching situations. Some people think highly of Garrett. Maybe you consider him to be the same caliber as Payton and Parcells. Who knows. One guy is in the Hall, the other is coaching and the the other can’t get a coaching job…..
Exactly, you're creating a Dak Excuse.....Dak didnt have the coaching Romo had. There's always something that a Dak fan can focus on as a reason. If anything you could blame Dak's luck as another excuse.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
84,716
Reaction score
77,149
Exactly, you're creating a Dak Excuse.....Dak didnt have the coaching Romo had. There's always something that a Dak fan can focus on as a reason. If anything you could blame Dak's luck as another excuse.
You’re arguing just to argue. Is Garrett the caliber of Parcells or Sean Payton? If he is to you then fair enough. If he’s not then what are you arguing? The statement is they are both the same quarterback and have had the same career. You’re arguing against a point because you don’t like the way the point is presented to you is childish.
 

CowboyoWales

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,726
Reaction score
4,903
No need because both Tony and Dak are quarterbacks with relatively impressive performance statistical careers. Obviously that does not make either of them elite quarterbacks.
Yep, both excellent on a rookie contracts, but can't raise game to compensate for their increased CAP hit, especially if they sign short-term contracts.
I'll say it again, the biggest problem with Daks pending contract WAS (at time of signing) that was for 4 years which with the $40m deferred money to add on, really doesn't give much flexibility to provide what he needs.
 

CowboyoWales

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,726
Reaction score
4,903
You’re arguing just to argue. Is Garrett the caliber of Parcells or Sean Payton? If he is to you then fair enough. If he’s not then what are you arguing? The statement is they are both the same quarterback and have had the same career. You’re arguing against a point because you don’t like the way the point is presented to you is childish.
Lol, that's what's called being Marathoned.
O-Line protection, penalties, running game, HC, OC, WR (inability to run routes or hands), Defenses that can't stop the run (meaning Dak is out of his comfort zone and is rushed....all excuses to deflect from Dak's personal performances.
In your eye's Dak's this hero that performs despite everyone else. It's that it's not a one off, for Dak First Fans, it gets to excuses because it's never him (and everyone else had the advantages he didn't have).
 

SultanOfSix

Star Power
Messages
12,984
Reaction score
8,239
Basically they are
No they aren’t. No way Dak goes toe-to-toe with a QB like Payton Manning for nearly 100 total points with a lack of defensive play in 2013. That game is over by halftime with Dakchoka. Tony was the most underrated QB in the league and most propagandized as a choker by the anti-Dallas crowd in the media and elsewhere. Those 8-8 seasons where he “choked” were 4-12 teams without him. It‘s guaranteed that a coach like Sean Payton would take Romo over Dak every time.
 
Last edited:

SteveTheCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,807
Reaction score
16,776
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Lol, that's what's called being Marathoned.
O-Line protection, penalties, running game, HC, OC, WR (inability to run routes or hands), Defenses that can't stop the run (meaning Dak is out of his comfort zone and is rushed....all excuses to deflect from Dak's personal performances.
In your eye's Dak's this hero that performs despite everyone else. It's that it's not a one off, for Dak First Fans, it gets to excuses because it's never him (and everyone else had the advantages he didn't have).
AKA AC'd.

Remarkably similar M.O.

They run it around in circles then act like YOU'RE the dumb one.
 

Gangsta Spanksta

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,842
Reaction score
10,241
AKA AC'd.

Remarkably similar M.O.

They run it around in circles then act like YOU'RE the dumb one.
Accept AC is proof that Dak had declined before the injury. He became Anti-Dak for a week, and Dak getting injured gave him an excuse to jump back onto the band wagon because he could point the finger at how bad Rush was, which must make Dak good.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
84,716
Reaction score
77,149
No they aren’t. No way Dak goes toe-to-toe with a QB like Payton Manning for nearly 100 total points with a lack of defensive play in 2013. That game is over by halftime with Dakchoka. Tony was the most underrated QB in the league and most propagandized as a choker by the anti-Dallas crowd in the media and elsewhere. Those 8-8 seasons where he “choked” were 4-12 teams without him. It‘s guaranteed that a coach like Sean Payton would take Romo over Dak every time.
He did it toe to toe with Brady…
 
Top