If you honestly think any of our back-ups would make any positive change to this offense you're beyond help. Your agenda is well known here anyway.
I don't hold any sway over personnel decisions. Neither do you. So we're in the same boat.
What we do is offer opinions on a variety of Cowboys related topics. And most of the time, yours and mine differ. No big deal.
Because of this, I laugh hard when I hear folks the likes of you spout off about other people's so called "agendas" as if anything we post on here has any real effect on who starts and who doesn't.
Poster X "has an agenda". Poster X is a "hater". Poster X is "beyond help".
Get over yourself dude. Other posters have opinions. We all have them. Most others are different from our own. I get that such things can defy logic when we're convinced that the opposite is true. I can't honestly believe that there are still people here who want Dak as the QB. it boggles my mind. But I just figure that they have a different opinion that mine and I argue them based on that opinion and the facts or thoughts they present in support of that opinion.
For example, your opinion is that if the backups played, the offense would look stagnant and terrible. And you know what, you might be right. I can't say with certainty that you are not correct in that opinion.
My opinion is, the offense under Dak already looks stagnant and terrible, as evidenced by the shutout yesterday for the first time in 15 years, and the fact that 10 out of the last 12 quarters, we haven't scored a TD. And you know what, the data in support of my argument is not conjecture. Those statistics are ironclad, irrefutable facts.
Dismiss that as an "agenda" if you must, to make your Dak leg humping a little easier to justify, but don't dismiss it as false. Because it's an irrefutable truth. Laid out there for all the world to see.