Dak Just Doesn't Have It!

[5Stars]

I'm not calling out anyone. Just saying...

TROLLING is against site rules.

So because they may have different opinions about the team they are trolls? I think you are a troll, how about that?

 

[windward]

The Cowboys scored 19 points in the first half lol\

People who talk about the QB and place any blame for yesterday there are imbeciles.

Well you just described most of the forum lol.

 

[America's Cowboy]

Dont you EVER try and censor people

Consider yourself lucky.

 

[Chasing6]

He kept us in it until Brooks slipped. I knew he'd be forcing things and make mistakes after that. There was no margin of error left. It's the same type of crap situatuons Romo was put in countless times. He won't get credit for helping us win, but he's very far down the list on why we lost.

5 TD's in a row. No margin of error period.

Question, so who carried the Saints???

No one. There TEAM kicked our arse.

We have no plan to win as a Team. We expect 3 players to win the game.

 

[Mac_MaloneV1]

such a pathetic excuse to excuse our overpaid QB .

The defense sucks YES. YES. We get that. But throwing 2 interceptions and fumbling the ball? Dak got the ball back after every Saints score and what did he do? He turned the ball over. Settled for field goals. He had every opportunity to match the Saints’ energy and he never even came close. I don’t care if he did score 16 points in the first half. It’s pathetic. It’s weak. He hasn’t changed since his first season here and he never will. Chump. I don’t see what others see in him. He’s a cool guy but cool guy doesn’t win SB: and that’s ultimately what’s at stake here.

People who say things like this - ignoring the fact that the first INT was not his fault AND ignoring the broader game context - are stupid. I have tried on this board for a long time to come up with a better word that isn't going to get me in trouble, but I don't think there is one. You can't watch the actual play and see what literally happens - just jump right to some fabricated narrative you love.

I honestly don't know how to even argue or debate such idiocy.

 

[America's Cowboy]

So because they may have different opinions about the team they are trolls? I think you are a troll, how about that?

You're the king of trolls around here, so I wouldn't be talking.

 

[noshame]

This is very simple, it's a rule you can count on because it's 100% true.
In difficult games, your quarterback is either part of the solution or part of the problem.

What do you think Dak is?

 

[Typhus]

Yeah, totally!

You should leave and stop being a Cowboys fan until Dak's no longer a Cowboy!

Join the Anti-Dakkers that were flushed right down the toilet when Dak signed his extension!

You have my full support! That'll show 'em!!!

Seems as though you don't care rather the Cowboys win or lose, but more engaged in embracing hater suffering...

 

[5Stars]

Consider yourself lucky.

I wish you were a mod, then there would be maybe three or four poster around here. This place would be full of spider webs.

 

[offlimits]

Really? Dak was not the problem yesterday. My gosh did you see the defense? It was a clown show.

 

[Mac_MaloneV1]

Well you just described most of the forum lol.

I'm well aware.

 

[Nav22]

Seems as though you don't care rather the Cowboys win or lose, but more engaged in embracing hater suffering...

"Seems as though you don't care rather the Cowboys win or lose"

Is English your 2nd language?

 

[5Stars]

Really? Dak was not the problem yesterday. My gosh did you see the defense? It was a clown show.

The defense won the first game and the defense lost this game, the offense has done not a damn thing but mouth off.

 

[America's Cowboy]

I wish you were a mod, then there would be maybe three or four poster around here. This place would be full of spider webs.

Pfft...you wish! I could easily bring in around 100 football savvy posters who could seriously enlighten and improve the atmosphere around here. Easily help make everything better.

 

[Typhus]

"Seems as though you don't care rather the Cowboys win or lose"

Is English your 2nd language?

Is a rational thought process your second choice?

 

[5Stars]

Pfft...you wish! I could easily bring in around 100 football savvy posters who could seriously enlighten and improve the atmosphere around here. Easily help make everything better.

Then do it. If you have that much influence, do it, you don't have to be a mod, just do it.

 

[Cowboys5217]

Really? Dak was not the problem yesterday. My gosh did you see the defense? It was a clown show.

So did Dak not get the ball back after each time NO scored, or did the rules change? What did Dak do with those possessions?

Dak was a huge part of the problem, especially since he is paid to be Tom Brady.

 

[America's Cowboy]

Then do it. If you have that much influence, do it, you don't have to be a mod, just do it.

I just might. Definitely would improve talk around here. Real football talk.

 

[Nav22]

Well unfortunately, he does have it.

It in the sense of majority of our cap and the ability to continue scamming an old senile man into believing he’s a deserving elite QB

Must SUCK to know that actual NFL experts believe you don't know jack about football.

Were you furrowing your brow in confusion when Tom Brady raved about Dak's play just a week ago?

Yeah, you were. Poor guy.

 

[BKBDAD]

Interesting choice of words when "Dak is up against tougher teams."

Does Dak play tougher teams by himself?

Can Dak rely on a run game. Do we have more than 1 WR?

For some reason we can not comprehend that our Defense sucks.

We exploit bad teams, injured teams, young teams with a strong pash rush that leads to turnovers and makes our DB's look unbelievable.

When we don't have a pass rush our DB's get exposed.

Any team that plays us, running the football should be their number 1 priority.

I totally agree however, sometimes you need your star QB to rise above everything and go win a football game. When was the last time Dak led a comeback against a quality team? If there’s a recent game I can’t think of it.