several things wrong with his diatribe. or mouth diarrhea
I asked him what's his point with all this stuff? is he trying to prove Dak is not good against the zone? is that it? and then what? what if he is not good against the zone? what's the point? I have not heard back. the fact is he has no point, but trying to find some tiny pigeon hole to bash Dak. that's the agenda and there is no other point, so he makes up shiet as he goes....he admited its a message board and he wants to post something.......its rather stupid if you ask me. so what's the point of the diatribe? he can't tell you....where is he going with it? are is he arguing for the sake of arguing.....
2ndly he is probably referring to an article he found that shows statistics from 2018-2019. he is pounding that to death. I have said it a million times that 2018 was a tale of two halves of a season. first half was a disaster. the offense struggled badly and that's because Allen Hurns was the #1 WR (let that sink in) and then it was beasley who ran three routes from the slot in Garrett/linehan offense. we got cooper and the offense was #1 offense in the league...so you go from Allen hurns as your first read to Beasley...let that sink in......yeah, what do you expect to happen. you get cooper and you take advantage of cooper and get him the ball and he did get him the ball in second half of 2018.
3rdly, and no defense in today's NFL plays strictly zone or man one way or the other during the season or during a game. they switch around. they may play primarily one way or the other, but depending on the game and game situation they play different types..so you want to tell me this guy, with a simple mind like his, with an obvious agenda and no point to make..... is watching the game and instantly recognizes a zone, vs. man defense as its happening and unfolding (remember sometimes defenses are disguised and it shows after the play unfolds). He is actually claiming that SD switched defenses and that's when Dak had success and when Dak struggled....
he flatly lied when he said dak went like 9/16......Dak only missed 3 passes up until last minute of the game that game and at one point he was 9/12.....so yeah he makes up ********* as he goes along....he didn't toss 170 yards minus a 40 yard play....he had 237 yards...take that 40 yard play out and its almost 200 yards.....so is he serious with that stuff? and in that last minute, 3 straight missed passes inside a minute...they played man defense......so there is that!!
half the shiet he claims to know about this stuff are in the first page of google results he finds....sometimes word for word. fact is he has no clue what he is talking about...seriosuly...he is watching game and deciphering defenses on the fly or is he telling us he is watching film afterward and analyzing the game and defenses? .. you want to tell me he knows more than NFL defesive coordinators and head coaches who have spent decades mastering their craft, get paid to do this 24x7 and some have won championships (ala tampa)? ....that he figured something about Dak and how to defend against him....by just googlinga single article from some obscure guy, and these DCs missed it? really!!!? you going there with this? you want to tell me the carolina DC had success against Dak and decided to switch it up!!! so that Dak has success...really...is that the angle!!!
btw, if they played zone defense, which is designed to stop big plays and big gains...he completed 85% of his passes against chargers.....so I guess yards are all that matter now....until the next argument, where yards are irrelevant....
and this is where he and few others like him speak from both sides of their mouth or perhaps some from their bottom hole. on the one hand, they blame Dak for changing plays to pass plays so he can pad his stats (yes, somebody actually said that) and then they say that Moore is calling run plays and "because"...QBs are often given a run play and a pass play and depending on the defensive line up, they change plays. even sometime they change routes for WRs as the defensive line up shifts....and Dak has had that freedom. against Tampa, we couldn't run, and they were loading the box, he changed a lot of plays to pass plays and we passed successfully (dammn you Zeurline). against Chargers, Philly and Carolina they were dropping into coverage to take away the big play and the pass, so he went with the run play....that's being smart...its not about padding stats (as some have accused), but doing and making the right call to help the team and offense succeed.
so yeah, these guys point to a different goal post depending on which argument they are arguing at the time...you can't have it both ways.
@khiladi has no clue what he is talking about. he is obviously making stuff up as he goes along....lying as he goes to try and win an argument with no point