Brady earned his elite status by kicking butt for 21 years and winning 7 super bowls. Only a Dak homer would take that away from him if he were to have one bad game. Dak has piled up decent stats over the past 16 games, I have no problem admitting to that. But how many championships has all of Daks stats lead to? Aikman averaged 200 to 250 yards a game, which is not impressive at all by today's standards, but he was considered elite because he won a ton of games and 3 super bowls.
Yeah for Dak, he continues to pile up stats that do nothing for anyone but his fantasy football followers.
put Dak or romo on those 90s championship teams , they still win them..its a team Game and Aikman didn't have to put out gaudy stats did he??
you made rocks argument for him..
those around or last two great qbs have failed them not the other way aropund..no qbs prefect dont just use yards Aikman RS numbers he threw far too many INTS I mean when tony Romo has nearly twice the tds and less INTS(that less ints in case you needed to check) over the same period of time then that proves he could have easily been inserted into the 90s teams and won..it was coaching and the players surrounding Aikman that made Aikman's career..ES was this teams most elite talent but whn you have what 12+ HOF players and HOF coaches around you for run lkie they have it drags them all up with you..
you show me When Dak or romo had the Coaches and the players to the extent those 90s teams had and say well they count do what Aikman did, ill tell you you are hater troll of daks and or romos..
yes winning matters but having players and coaches who are there helping you win vs Dak and romo basically being the best players on their team with very little help around them.
Aikman played with the BEST players ands coaches a players could ever hope for.
im not saying dak or Romo were better talents then AIKMAN but they were very close and in a different situation, could have done the same..
I mean Dan marino never won a SB never one much more then stat sheet and made the HOF..it happens 2nd tier qbs on ridiculous teams like the 2000s ravens , or flaccos ravens and dilfers bucs i know romo and Dak are better qbs then those qbs and they got rings they won the gbgi games but not by themselves with TEAM a GREAT Team..
Eli same thing Dank and Romo are as good if not better then ELI yet he got the rings because his team was better Defense was suffocating like those ravens teams.
you think Nick foles is better then Dak or romo? yet they have a ring.. Kurt warner very good qb his team made him great odd short stop with the giants he sucked hard got cut ended up with the cardinals won anther ring didnt suck..foles what did he do withy any team NOT the eagles? looks like a bad qb a backup yet hes got a ring.
I understand career status typically measured by rings but there are instances you have to admit players careers were robbed by being in the wrong situations. I feel Bad for romo, LEE and witten ythose dudes deserved a ring were good enough to get a ring..
use you common sense brother, dak is good enough and fault all being laid at his feet like a lot of romo haters is just personal opinion and not fact..we can go al day with this thoughout history to find undeserving qbs who got rings and deserving qbs and other players who did not..