CowboysFaninHouston
CowboysFaninDC
- Messages
- 33,929
- Reaction score
- 19,486
Just balancing out your commentNothing but? There are as many threads praising Dak as there are ones bashing him.
Just balancing out your commentNothing but? There are as many threads praising Dak as there are ones bashing him.
It does. Maybe this is everywhere….maybe there are some Ravens fans who are anti Lamar and positive Lamar……It was sarcasm....the Dak threads tend to deteriorate into personal.attacks. way too much emotions involved
so Romo, Prescott, Cousins, Lamar Jackson…..who is the 5th?https://www.nfl.com/news/can-dak-prescott-quarterback-cowboys-to-playoff-success
Since their last Lombardi Trophy was hoisted at the conclusion of Super Bowl XXX, the Cowboys have yet to return to the NFC Championship Game, posting a dismal 0-7 mark in the Divisional Round. Three of those losses, including last season's defeat against the San Francisco 49ers, have come with Prescott under center, as he's become one of five QBs in the Super Bowl era to start three or more divisional tilts and go winless.
Who was the last to do so?
Well, it was current CBS analyst and former Cowboys QB1 Tony Romo, who Prescott succeeded in Dallas. The Cowboys are the only franchise with two quarterbacks to play in three or more Divisional Round games without winning one. Long gone are the days of Hall of Fame Cowboys greats Roger Staubach and Troy Aikman, whose reputations were borne of playoff conquests and clutch play that saw them go 5-2 and 4-1, respectively, in the Divisional Round. Those days of Cowboys QBs captaining their squads to long postseason runs have ridden off into the sunset so far this century.
It certainly does, or more specifically, the ownership & front office of this team.Says more about the Cowboys team then it does the quarterback.
But I think, not 3 divisional round gamesI think Dalton was 0-5 in the playoffs.
No, he is a person with opinion.You're just a stubborn mule stuck on ignorance.
Some of these threads are started for that specific purpose.It was sarcasm....the Dak threads tend to deteriorate into personal.attacks. way too much emotions involved
Good point.I guess we could ask, of the 100s of NFL QBs in the SB era, how many have even made it to three Divisional round playoffs games?
10%?
less?
Cousins and Lamar are not part of this 5.so Romo, Prescott, Cousins, Lamar Jackson…..who is the 5th?
Thats the thing if he worded like that then it wouldn't be such a negative, thats not the point he is trying to make...like saying "Lamar and Cousins are not on the list" well thats because they have not made 3 Divisional playoff games...I guess we could ask, of the 100s of NFL QBs in the SB era, how many have even made it to three Divisional round playoffs games?
10%?
less?
so Romo, Prescott, Cousins, Lamar Jackson…..who is the 5th?
100%. Dak could have won both San Francisco games if played better on the money downs. You certainly can criticize him for the 2nd down interception that turned the last game around. Romo the same could be said for the Giants game and maybe he should have dumped the pass down to Beasley instead of the bomb to Dez.It certainly does, or more specifically, the ownership & front office of this team.
However, it also does speak to the QBs. It is wrong to assign them completely to wins and losses. They are a member of the team and a part of every success and failure and the singular most important position. It’s not unreasonable to be more critical of the QB versus the rest of the team.
well, who are they?Cousins and Lamar are not part of this 5.
umm. post 197..?well, who are they?
its hot July month. no football. only Baseball, they are about to hit mid season and not even real baseball games. anticipation, anxiety and excitment for the new NFL year building up and people get real antsy and hot tempered. every year around this time is the same.Some of these threads are started for that specific purpose.