CowboysFaninHouston
CowboysFaninDC
- Messages
- 33,929
- Reaction score
- 19,486
wwjhaaat!!??I knew someone was going to invoke the great 6th round Tom Brady to dismiss Dak being picked in the 4th round as if they are mutually exclusive.
wwjhaaat!!??I knew someone was going to invoke the great 6th round Tom Brady to dismiss Dak being picked in the 4th round as if they are mutually exclusive.
AC agrees with you when calling everything in the post wrong.You used the wrong example to try andmprove Dak is not talented. You could have chosen ten othe lines of reasoning. But given your lack of football knowledge explains why you tried a simpleton logic
Yes scientists are able to explain outliers..Imagine if scientist used the outliers instead of the base when making medicines and such.
Yikes.
I edited my post. I accidentally used the wrong word.wwjhaaat!!??
I didn't say you were wrong. Again your black and white view of the world. I didn't agree with you 100% and thus you say agree 100% or else you are saying it's all wrong.AC agrees with you when calling everything in the post wrong.
That's all that needs to be said.
Scientists also don't rely on outliers. Dak fans do.Yes scientists are able to explain outliers..
Don't venture into areas that you are clueless about
Me too… was thinking Andrew Luck but he made it to one conference championship before retiring.This is actually starting to bother me…
Who are the other 3? Rivers made an AFCCG, Bledsoe made a SB, Cunningham made an NFCCG with Minnesota, Andy Dalton? Did he make 3 divisional rounds? Maybe he had a lot of byes.
AC will be along to like your posts any minute now.I didn't say you were wrong. Again your black and white view of the world. I didn't agree with you 100% and thus you say agree 100% or else you are saying it's all wrong.
Too funny.....
And 100s of failures in higher rounds. It's about probabilities and that subject is way above your head to discuss.You used an outlier to base your opinion while ignoring the 100+ failures like Dak and Romo.
You seem to have gotten way emotional about an irrelevant post.AC will be along to like your posts any minute now.
You can't even explain what an outlier is. But here we are
Leaf and Dak both are losers on the field.And 100s of failures in higher rounds. It's about probabilities and that subject is way above your head to discuss.
explain Ryan Leaf the 2nd pick of the draft and 2nd talented player based on your logic
Tom Brady is an outlier. Pat Mahomes is not.You can't even explain what an outlier is. But here we are
But Leaf was 2nd pick of the draft.....Leaf and Dak both are losers on the field.
Turbiskey was drafted ahead of Mahomes.Tom Brady is an outlier. Pat Mahomes is not.
You see most of the best results from QBs drafted higher than you do from QBs drafted lower.
You put your faith in a outlier when I want to go after the proven base.
It's not hard, bro.
I don't care what people thought.Turbiskey was drafted ahead of Mahomes.
People thought he was more talented
But he was 2nd pick, mahomes 12th pick and dak is a 4th rounder.....so goes your logic..the higher the pick they must be more talentedI don't care what people thought.
He proved not to be and the Bears moved on and got someone else, meanwhile here we are, just waiting for our loser to sign an extension.
You use the one outlier in Daks career to say he has an interception problem.Imagine if scientist used the outliers instead of the base when making medicines and such.
Yikes.