Dak Prescott- Kirk Cousins

[cowboyec]

dak is the better qb.

 

[Calvin2Tony2Emmitt2Julius]

I bet you laid down next to your keyboard and wept a little bit after typing that.

Man You're just weird

 

[Kingofholland]

It is an accurate description

 

[Hadenough]

Cousins is easily better than Dak.

I've said it for years and it still remains true.

And he isn't injury prone like Prescott.

 

[stinkface]

Lol why did the 49ers win that game against us without a run game? Why did they win that game when their superior players besides Kittle and superior scheme got shutdown?

Because we didn't score enough points. That's why we lost. Bring more O talent and we win more games. Pretty simple. Our D played well enough to win.

 

[Captain-Crash]

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Cousins is easily better than Dak.

I've said it for years and it still remains true.

easily? how could that be. he is 1-3 in the playoffs. hasn't won anything. Dak is 2-4. its totally false. absolute false

and Dak is better in almost every statistical category than Cousins.

or is it the convolution of your mind and your hatred of Dak driving this craziness. there is absolutely nothing you can point to , that supports even your own measure of a QB.

Cousins sucks, worse than Dak. come to grips with it....

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

easily? how could that be. he is 1-3 in the playoffs. hasn't won anything. Dak is 2-4. its totally false. absolute false

and Dak is better in almost every statistical category than Cousins.

or is it the convolution of your mind and your hatred of Dak driving this craziness. there is absolutely nothing you can point to , that supports even your own measure of a QB.

Cousins sucks, worse than Dak. come to grips with it....

Post their stats side by side.

 

[DFWJC]

Yet that same logic does not apply when the Cowboys lose. At that point it is firmly Daks fault.

depends on if you talk to folks that understand it's a team game or not.

Usually, people are consistent with this. If you find someone that applies team wins/losses to QBs in one case and not in the other, then call them out.

Now if a player clearly blows the game or carries the team you could at least make the argument that played a big role. That's about it though.

 

[diamonddelts]

Post their stats side by side.

Dak is 4-1 against Cousins. You have to learn to live with that.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Dak is 4-1 against Cousins. You have to learn to live with that.

Dak and Cousins have never been on the field at the same time during a game.

 

[RonnieT24]

Post their stats side by side.

Why? I have been consistently reading on here that stats don't matter. "Only wins do." Have you now decided that they DO matter? I'm confused by this reversal of logic. Somebody please stabilize that goalpost willya.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Why? I have been consistently reading on here that stats don't matter. "Only wins do." Have you now decided that they DO matter? I'm confused by this reversal of logic. Somebody please stabilize that goalpost willya.

You're a well known Dak/Zeke apologist.

Your opinions don't hold any weight at all because you're player over team.

 

[raven55]

cousins are dak what does it matter a MR IRELVENT if he hadn't been hurt there was a good possibility that San Fran would have been in the super bowl. and for all that's said about cousins and dak with all his so called weapons he's still along with us watching from the side lines again remember dak has been here 7 years. and plus one but next year do you sell the team down the river for extention or play out the whole season and then get rid of the baggage. Don't worry jerry probadly will

 

[diamonddelts]

You're a well known Dak/Zeke apologist.

Your opinions don't hold any weight at all because you're player over team.

He is right though. When the Cowboys lose, you have no problem making multiple threads assigning the loss to Dak. But when the Cowboys win, all of a sudden it's not Daks success but the teams success.

Which one is it? You are professional goal post mover based on your own personal bias.

 

[Redline360]

Lol at thinking just because Dak is 4-1 against Cousins makes him automatically better.

Getting dumber as the posts go on. Honestly feel like half the posters know nothing about "sports" in general.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

He is right though. When the Cowboys lose, you have no problem making multiple threads assigning the loss to Dak. But when the Cowboys win, all of a sudden it's not Daks success but the teams success.

Which one is it? You are professional goal post mover based on your own personal bias.

We win games with Dak, not because of Dak.

He's that type of QB.

 

[diamonddelts]

We win games with Dak, not because of Dak.

He's that type of QB.

Lol. Ok. That post says it all right there.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Lol at thinking just because Dak is 4-1 against Cousins makes him automatically better.

Getting dumber as the posts go on. Honestly feel like half the posters know nothing about "sports" in general.

This is what it's come to for the Dak over Dallas fans.

These aren't Cowboys fans we're dealing with here.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Lol. Ok. That post says it all right there.

Your posts say you're not even a Cowboys fan, just a Dak fan.

If you're against me then I know I'm on the Cowboys side of things.