Dak Prescott was walking with a slight limp while going into the locker room

Right on schedule. Bag a win against the hapless Raiders then he will be shut down for the season before facing the Eagles, Chiefs and Lions.
Actually, a sensible man would shut down, given what is seen on the field......shutdowns already (No fight, no discipline, no pride, no talent). We have a defense that is only rivaled by Cincy right now and can't be saved this year, and an OL that didn't play well at all..........and we were beaten as early as the first Cards drive. This TEAM is like a dog with its tail tucked outside the fence, but barking inside the fence. Can you see what I see?
 
Actually, a sensible man would shut down, given what is seen on the field......shutdowns already (No fight, no discipline, no pride, no talent). We have a defense that is only rivaled by Cincy right now and can't be saved this year, and an OL that didn't play well at all..........and we were beaten as early as the first Cards drive. This TEAM is like a dog with its tail tucked outside the fence, but barking inside the fence. Can you see what I see?
Everyone can see how badly the defense is performing. But perhaps you don't see my point. If the team committed it's resources even slightly more evenly to the defense then it would improve but the offense seems to need the lion share of resources to just keep Dak afloat which shouldn't be the case for the most expensive player in NFL history.
 
Everyone can see how badly the defense is performing. But perhaps you don't see my point. If the team committed it's resources even slightly more evenly to the defense then it would improve but the offense seems to need the lion share of resources to just keep Dak afloat which shouldn't be the case for the most expensive player in NFL history.
There it is......Dak's pockets again. Really? Bland and Diggs getting paid......how's that working out? Bland got treated like a rookie last night. He should have carried Harrison's bags to the plane to complete the disrespect. Let's be logical.....otherwise you will continue to be fooled by Jerry and the current NFL product he has placed on the field. I actually feel bad for Eberflus now.......what's he working with?
 
There it is......Dak's pockets again. Really? Bland and Diggs getting paid......how's that working out? Bland got treated like a rookie last night. He should have carried Harrison's bags to the plane to complete the disrespect. Let's be logical.....otherwise you will continue to be fooled by Jerry and the current NFL product he has placed on the field. I actually feel bad for Eberflus now.......what's he working with?
There is a salary cap in the NFL otherwise I would not care how much Dak Prescott is being paid.
Darnold and Mayfield are both arguably playing better than Dak this season and they both had better seasons than him last year yet are being paid a fraction of the price especially in guaranteed money.
Bland and Diggs have both grossly underperformed since signing their contracts as well but the differential has far less impact than Prescott.
The team will go nowhere whilst they pay a reasonably good/at times average and even below average NFL quarterback like Dak Prescott elite money as though he is the best player in that position when it's highly debatable if he's even in the top 10.
If Dak was paid what he's actually worth in the market which is similar to Darnold and Mayfield then for a start Parsons would not have been traded.
People can harp on about Parsons and whatever but with him, the team in all likelihood beats the Eagles, Packers and the Cardinals (for a start surely Schotty wouldn't turn down countless field goals because he doesn't trust the defense). The team would be 6-3 and with a 50/50 shot of winning the division.
The front office is the problem including their decisions like paying Dak Prescott $231 million guaranteed in a 4 year contract.
 
There is a salary cap in the NFL otherwise I would not care how much Dak Prescott is being paid.
Darnold and Mayfield are both arguably playing better than Dak this season and they both had better seasons than him last year yet are being paid a fraction of the price especially in guaranteed money.
Bland and Diggs have both grossly underperformed since signing their contracts as well but the differential has far less impact than Prescott.
The team will go nowhere whilst they pay a reasonably good/at times average and even below average NFL quarterback like Dak Prescott elite money as though he is the best player in that position when it's highly debatable if he's even in the top 10.
If Dak was paid what he's actually worth in the market which is similar to Darnold and Mayfield then for a start Parsons would not have been traded.
People can harp on about Parsons and whatever but with him, the team in all likelihood beats the Eagles, Packers and the Cardinals (for a start surely Schotty wouldn't turn down countless field goals because he doesn't trust the defense). The team would be 6-3 and with a 50/50 shot of winning the division.
The front office is the problem including their decisions like paying Dak Prescott $231 million guaranteed in a 4 year contract.
You may need to be the salary capologist on this team and go get Cooper Rush to return. See how that works.
 
You may need to be the salary capologist on this team and go get Cooper Rush to return. See how that works.
Why would I want Cooper Rush to return? He has shown that he's just a practice squad quarterback at the Ravens yet the Cowboys won more games with him starting than Prescott during at least one of the seasons he was called upon albeit from a relatively small sample size. What does that tell you about the importance of Prescott to the team if a bad NFL quarterback like Rush is producing similar results to him? The answer is that he is not worth paying $231 million in guaranteed money and kneecapping the team over the foreseeable future.
The problems start at the front office but one of the biggest issues is them having paid the aforementioned contract to Prescott which just results in other issues snowballing from it as a result.
 
Why would I want Cooper Rush to return? He has shown that he's just a practice squad quarterback at the Ravens yet the Cowboys won more games with him starting than Prescott during at least one of the seasons he was called upon albeit from a relatively small sample size. What does that tell you about the importance of Prescott to the team if a bad NFL quarterback like Rush is producing similar results to him? The answer is that he is not worth paying $231 million in guaranteed money and kneecapping the team over the foreseeable future.
The problems start at the front office but one of the biggest issues is them having paid the aforementioned contract to Prescott which just results in other issues snowballing from it as a result.
Then who? Please don't say wait for Arch Manning. Who? Get past Dak's salary........who would you have at QB? Stay with me now.
 
Why would I want Cooper Rush to return? He has shown that he's just a practice squad quarterback at the Ravens yet the Cowboys won more games with him starting than Prescott during at least one of the seasons he was called upon albeit from a relatively small sample size. What does that tell you about the importance of Prescott to the team if a bad NFL quarterback like Rush is producing similar results to him? The answer is that he is not worth paying $231 million in guaranteed money and kneecapping the team over the foreseeable future.
The problems start at the front office but one of the biggest issues is them having paid the aforementioned contract to Prescott which just results in other issues snowballing from it as a result.
I would agree. Dak Prescott is clearly a better QB than Cooper Rush, but the bigger issue is that the supporting cast seems to be a larger factor in team success/failure than the QB is. Obviously there are some exceptions to that in teams that specifically build their offense around fitting their QB like a Baltimore, however there are no shortages of examples of QBs going to better teams and organizations only to see their play increase. What Flacco is doing this year is the easy example. Mayfield, Darnold, Stafford, Goff, etc. are all guys that have produced with talent around them and struggled significantly more on bad teams.
 
Then who? Please don't say wait for Arch Manning. Who? Get past Dak's salary........who would you have at QB? Stay with me now.
The issue is you can't just ignore Daks salary in this scenario though. No one...well very few people are going to truly argue that Dak is a horrible QB, hes not. The guy has cap hits ranging from $50m - $78m the next four years still remains an issue though. Thats a huge part of the equation where you could fit 3-5 additions to the team for that money. Obviously they need to hit on a few of those guys, but if we had the Cowboys in their current form + $50M to spend on the defense this past offseason is this team better or worse than 3-5-1 with Mac Jones at QB?
 
Last edited:
Then who? Please don't say wait for Arch Manning. Who? Get past Dak's salary........who would you have at QB? Stay with me now.
Well in previous years I wanted Jalen Hurts but the Cowboys drafted Diggs instead. Then I would have traded up to grab Justin Herbert alas this didn't happen.
We have seen other quarterbacks who many considered washed in this league yet actually prove themselves to be highly competent NFL starters like Darnold, Mayfield, Mac and Daniel Jones (yes even Daniel Jones), Geno Smith and even Joe Flacco!
It's too early to name a quarterback who could be drafted as we need to see how the college season plays out and where the Cowboys will be drafting from but in my view there will pretty much always be seasoned quarterbacks available at the end of each season who could come in and basically produce the same or similar results to Prescott at a fraction of the price.
My simple question is would you rather Sam Darnold/Baker Mayfield and Micah Parsons or just Dak Prescott? That's the type of difference in their contracts. Of course there will still be huge other issues to address but if a team can have arguably one of the top 3 defenders in the league and a quarterback producing the same/similar results to other quarterbacks then surely anyone would also want an elite defender?
 
Well in previous years I wanted Jalen Hurts but the Cowboys drafted Diggs instead. Then I would have traded up to grab Justin Herbert alas this didn't happen.
We have seen other quarterbacks who many considered washed in this league yet actually prove themselves to be highly competent NFL starters like Darnold, Mayfield, Mac and Daniel Jones (yes even Daniel Jones), Geno Smith and even Joe Flacco!
It's too early to name a quarterback who could be drafted as we need to see how the college season plays out and where the Cowboys will be drafting from but in my view there will pretty much always be seasoned quarterbacks available at the end of each season who could come in and basically produce the same or similar results to Prescott at a fraction of the price.
My simple question is would you rather Sam Darnold/Baker Mayfield and Micah Parsons or just Dak Prescott? That's the type of difference in their contracts. Of course there will still be huge other issues to address but if a team can have arguably one of the top 3 defenders in the league and a quarterback producing the same/similar results to other quarterbacks then surely anyone would also want an elite defender?
We don't just have Dak (CD, Diggs, Bland paid). You keep going backwards.....let's go forward since Dak has his contract, Sam on his 5th team, Baker is ballin' and Micah in GB. Now what. How would you fix the issues now? I need a Board GM and Salary Capologist to handle the current plight, not rehash opinion.
 
If Dak was being paid the same as a Mayfield or Darnold then whilst I would still prefer a better quarterback, I wouldn't have too much of an issue as the defense could have far more resources allocated to it. The reality is most teams will have handed out bad contracts to players who subsequently do not produce what they are paid but it's the quarterback contract which a team really can't get wrong due to how much they are paid.
 
Did he look injured to you when he was scrambling because he was scared to throw into zone coverage AFTER that play?
And then when he throws it interception, because you want him to throw into coverage, the next sentence is oh he sucks
 
The issue is you can't just ignore Daks salary in this scenario though. No one...well very few people are going to truly argue that Dak is a horrible QB, hes not. The guy has cap hits ranging from $50m - $78m the next four years still remains an issue though. Thats a huge part of the equation where you could fit 3-5 additions to the team for that money. Obviously they need to hit on a few of those guys, but if we had the Cowboys in their current form + $50M to spend on the defense this past offseason is this team better or worse than 3-5-1 with Mac Jones at QB?
May want to look closer....there is something called restructure for Dak, probably CD ....just to name those two. Now Mac Jones?.......are you just going to dismiss Mac Jones' team's defense, in comparison to ours and SF payroll too? Dak's money that bothersome?
 
Yeah after that play I thought he was done for the night. It looked bad. It’s good we got a week off so he can heal up. First thing I thought was high ankle sprain. Did the offensive line decide to close their eyes and use the force to play tonight? What was going on with them?

Honestly, is there a way to get Doug Free to come back and play RT? He might be better than Steele.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,411
Messages
14,535,591
Members
24,211
Latest member
yurikodiaz21
Back
Top