Dak record all time vs current Top 5 QBs

[Yobwocs]

6-5 overall.

Top 5 QBs are Herbert, Stafford, Mahomes, Allen, and Jackson. Omitting Burrow because he's never played Burrow.

Confused as to this day this "Dak beats bad teams" nonsense. Every record I compile proves otherwise. Those are some of the best regarded QBs in the league. Best QBs usually field dominant teams, so a great QB has a high correlation with a quality team being a quality team - and Dak is one game above .500 against Top 5 QBs.

That's not bad in my opinion. Surely this "Dak beats bad teams" thing is just fluff at this point. And even those comments are fading with each passing year - once you leave this board.

 

[jazzcat22]

Right.
When Dallas wins, it is the team.
When they lose it is Dak's fault. Even with the depleted defense from injuries. There were those that blamed Dak.

 

[big dog cowboy]

Confused as to this day this "Dak beats bad teams" nonsense.

Opponent's record entering game	Dak's record	Win %
Winning record (> .500)	30–35	46.2%
Exactly .500	8–5	61.5%
Losing record (< .500)	45–15–1	74.6%
Total	83–55–1	60.1%

 

[zrinkill]

Are we talking about the playoffs or the regular season?

 

[Rockport]

Opponent's record entering game	Dak's record	Win %
Winning record (> .500)	30–35	46.2%
Exactly .500	8–5	61.5%
Losing record (< .500)	45–15–1	74.6%
Total	83–55–1	60.1%

You lost me at column “Dak’s record”. It’s a team game. It’s not tennis.

 

[JoeKing]

Right.
When Dallas wins, it is the team.
When they lose it is Dak's fault. Even with the depleted defense from injuries. There were those that blamed Dak.

Right, it's a team sport until we lose because of Dak.

 

[Jarntt]

Opponent's record entering game	Dak's record	Win %
Winning record (> .500)	30–35	46.2%
Exactly .500	8–5	61.5%
Losing record (< .500)	45–15–1	74.6%
Total	83–55–1	60.1%

Seems about as expected for most good but not great teams right?

 

[Jarntt]

Right.
When Dallas wins, it is the team.
When they lose it is Dak's fault. Even with the depleted defense from injuries. There were those that blamed Dak.

And then with those on the other side it's the complete inverse yet both sides call the other out for it as if they aren't doing the exact same thing...

 

[Vtwin]

You lost me at column “Dak’s record”. It’s a team game. It’s not tennis.

The first two words in the title of the thread are "Dak record". The OP then tries to stitch together some warped version of logic to say that since the QB was good then the team must be good so therefore Prescott beat a good team. For example, the OP is giving credit to Prescott for beating Mahomes last season and since Mahomes is a good QB that must mean that Prescott beat a good team.

Were the Chiefs a good team last year?

Come on man. How can you balk at the column titled "Dak's Record" while completely ignoring the entire premise the OP is trying to sell?

That is some high quality delusion going on there.