UncleRico
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 765
- Reaction score
- 669
Dak played great against Eagles first game tooLol I know the eagles count as a winning team but that wasn't the actual eagles who won those 9 games either.
Dak played great against Eagles first game tooLol I know the eagles count as a winning team but that wasn't the actual eagles who won those 9 games either.
LolDad?
Clearly not.Tonight was a regular season game with actual stakes (seeding). Whether you choose to accept that fact or not is irrelevant.
I guess you’re part of the latter group you described?
So in summary, dak isn’t Brady but you have been proven 100% wrong about how good dak would become.Overall, Dak had a really solid season. But he’s not atom Brady
Another night, another day you look as dumb as you always do.So did tonight’s numbers count as a good team because we played their backups.
That’s how complete stats work. You don’t get to pick and choose certain games to fit a narrative.



Clearly not.
The attempted implication from the stat was to try and make Dak look good against "good" teams (not defenses. It is not intellectually honest to pretend like one of those team playing their backups doesn't disqualify them from being included in that group for that game. It is not the same team that got the winning record.
Dak literally isn't fit to carry Brady's jock. Stop with these posts comparing him to Brady. As a Cowboys fan it's embarrassing.Dak's Against Winning Teams
4-4 Record
107.875 Rating
19 TDs
5 INT
Dak Against .500 or Losing Teams
7-1 Record
102.1 Rating
18 TDs
5 INT
Tom Brady Against Winning Teams
5-1 Record
94.51666 Rating
10 TDs
4 INT
Tom Brady Against .500 or Losing Teams
7-3 Record
103.49 Rating
30 TDs
8 INT
Just saying! Tom Brady has thrown 30 TDs against .500 or below teams while only 10 against winning teams. Dak has thrown about the same against both. Even if you take out this Eagles game where you claim was against backups, his stats still look more similar than Tom's playing of good teams vs playing bad teams. Also, Tom played the Eagles and Washington too and played worse than Dak, so you gotta consider that.
W/L is a team stats.
Tom Brady has lead his team to 10 Super Bowls. You shouldn't compare Dak to guys like this.
Defense and the running game!That tells me that defenses have more to do with win loss then people give them credit for. Brady has always been a stat padder.
At some point in every season he went to super bowl he played and beat very good teams to win 7 titles. Dak will impress me if he gets us to nfcgc.Tom Brady has also feasted upon a notoriously weak AFC East for most of his career.
Not taking anything away from him, just tamping out the stupidity coming from the haters club.
Some troll was on me trying to defend Brady. We all know he is the GOAT, but Belichick loves running up scores on bad teams. I will never forget what he did to Joe Gibbs. Brady was taught by the master.Defense and the running game!
Clearly not.
The attempted implication from the stat was to try and make Dak look good against "good" teams (not defenses. It is not intellectually honest to pretend like one of those team playing their backups doesn't disqualify them from being included in that group for that game. It is not the same team that got the winning record.
Oh yeah? Well he better get started. It's year 6.You should, Dak is the GOAT hunter.
Teams have been decimated with covid/injuries all season. The games counted for those opposing QBs, and they count here. Cut the crap.You can't be intellectually honest and count tonight's game.
