Dak vs Romo: Just the Facts

[CowboysFaninHouston]

2-4 & 2-5 for 19 years of play is pathetic

exactly. its like trying to compare two different craps and claiming that one stinks less than the other, forgetting that it stinks regardless

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Here is how Dak and Romo were ranked for passer rating in their first 9 years:
Dak: 3rd, 17th, 14th, 10th, DNQ, 3rd, 16th, 2nd, 28th Average = 11.6
Romo: 5th, 5th, 8th, 8th, DNQ, 4th, 10th, 8th, 1st Average = 6.1

Versus his peers, Romo was simply a better passer than Dak. Romo never finished out of the top 10 in passer rating. Dak has finished outside of the top 10 in half of his seasons.

there is lies, there is damn lies and then there is statistics.
ple will
people will use the stat that supports their point of view or agenda.
now do passing yards per game? int%, etc....and which passer rating stat did you use as there is two different ones.

 

[ShortRound]

exactly. its like trying to compare two different craps and claiming that one stinks less than the other, forgetting that it stinks regardless

lol no it's not

 

[NFCBeasts]

OOOOOHHH Burn, wow 5th grade back in session..retire from stand up, its not working..

also retire fandom opinions , you have zero eye for talent cause apparently you don't know what average is you don't even know how to do basic math you're telling me that Prescott's career he's been sitting at 16 in the league because that would be average the man is about to set every record in Dallas Cowboys history going to be third or fourth all time for the Dallas Cowboys plus he owns a lot of NFL records you know important stats like touchdown interception ratio completion percentage he's been MVP voting all pro pro bowler been in the top 100 more times than I can count but part of number one offense is not what you call average you're the problem your eye is the problem your hate and disdains IS the problem..

see I can like Romo and Prescott and Aikman and Staubach and see they all were great, but you can't see it you can't separate team failures from the quarterback, and we get it super casuals they don't understand football, so they blame the quarterback because he makes the most money and they're upset because it's not their favorite.

This is not a popularity contest, literally the stats show he's so far from average you're in the wrong zip code..

TL;DR

 

[CowboyoWales]

You read the stats comparison, right? Both QBs have very similar stats and have the same number of wild card wins. You do acknowledge facts, right?

Then why is one QB so revered and one so reviled?

Romo got as much money as he could soak Jerry for and no one complained. Dak did the same and omg, he’s gets destroyed for it.

A few points:

1. In case you haven’t been following the NFL the past 30 years, QBs are vastly overpaid because there are so few great ones. Neither Romo nor Dak are great QBs as evidenced by their pitiful 2 wild card wins and literally the same stats, with Dak having slightly better stats.

2. There is a huge double standard for the way Romo is revered vs Dak. There are differences of course but they have virtually the same stats and the same number of wild card wins. But when anyone brings this up, you’d think Dak shot the pope and Romo ended world hunger and that’s my point, a double standard to anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear.

You can prefer Romo over Dak and that’s fine. But don’t pretend Romo brought this organization anything that Dak hasn’t equally delivered.

Again, the focus should be on our owner and GM for insisting on making every football decision winning be damned.

Who's revering Romo???? What you've got SO WRONG, is that either of them are anything. Your OP and now this response seems to be a protection of Dak who appears to be a pet cat of yours....let it go both overpaid and big failures, especially against the money they were paid.

 

[Blackrain]

Dak has almost 2,000 yards rushing in his career along with 29 rushing touchdowns and 60 fumbles
Romo has 620 rushing yards five rushing touchdowns and 62 fumbles.
Just some more stats

 

[WillieBeamen]

2012? beat washington and we are in...he lost the game. throwing 3 interceptions.
2011? beat Giants and we are in....nah. couldn't get it done
2009? beat Philly and we are in....we got jacked 44-6

and then 4 playoff losses....

If I were you, I would run and hide from this post

U lied and now are embarrassing yourself even further.

In 2009, the Cowboys went 11-5 and won the division and a playoff game

 

[doomsday9084]

there is lies, there is damn lies and then there is statistics.
ple will
people will use the stat that supports their point of view or agenda.
now do passing yards per game? int%, etc....and which passer rating stat did you use as there is two different ones.

If you look, by raw statistics, most of the greatest QB's of all time play right now. That's not because guys like Dan Marino suck. Its because the game has changed. If you drop a guy like Montana in today's NFL he would put up video game like stats.

Technically, Brock Purdy is one of the greatest QB's of all time based on per game stats. He isn't.

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/P/PurdBr00.htm
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/P/PresDa01.htm

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

lol no it's not

yes it is.....2-5, 2-4 in playoffs. its crap

 

[ArtClink]

Dak has almost 2,000 yards rushing in his career along with 29 rushing touchdowns and 60 fumbles
Romo has 620 rushing yards five rushing touchdowns and 62 fumbles.
Just some more stats

But everyone says Romo was the better escape artist, not Dak lol.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

U lied and now are embarrassing yourself even further.

In 2009, the Cowboys went 11-5 and won the division and a playoff game

my mistake on the 2009. its 2008....typo...I am the bigger man and will say if I made mistake. so years are 2008, 2011, 2012.
and if you weren't so hell bent on arguing you would have noticed I said a 44-6 loss to Philly...which did happen in the last game of 2008...
and embarassingly for you, you didn't mention anything about 2011 and 2012......

but your are so desparate. so small. so petty, that you just want to argue.
I know I have kicked your arse a few times around here. it must still sting, but man...this is very desparate. its like you are hanging on to a straw in the middle of a tsunami and declaring you are saved...in the meantime you drowned 3 posts ago

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

If you look, by raw statistics, most of the greatest QB's of all time play right now. That's not because guys like Dan Marino suck. Its because the game has changed. If you drop a guy like Montana in today's NFL he would put up video game like stats.

Technically, Brock Purdy is one of the greatest QB's of all time based on per game stats. He isn't.

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/P/PurdBr00.htm
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/P/PresDa01.htm

I agree, the game changed. passing became easier and focus is on scoring through passing. put marino on a team today and 6000 yards is a norm for him. he was just that good.

 

[starfan1]

The real problem in the last 20 years has not been the QB it amazes me that we are still doing comparisons. The only comparison Ill make at this point is neither QB was good enough to overcome this pathetic GM. And quite frankly few QBs would be.

But I understand narratives must be met so continue on

 

[McKDaddy]

But everyone says Romo was the better escape artist, not Dak lol.

You are not seriously suggesting that a QB known for bumbling around the pocket & getting sacked (even by his own linemen) is a better "escape artist" than a QB renowned for his escapes (spin move)? Might want to talk to JJ Watt.
You can't make this stuff up. It's unbelievable. If Disney had your imagination, know telling what he could of created.

 

[Vtwin]

2012? beat washington and we are in...he lost the game. throwing 3 interceptions.
2011? beat Giants and we are in....nah. couldn't get it done
2009? beat Philly and we are in....we got jacked 44-6

and then 4 playoff losses....

If I were you, I would run and hide from this post

If I were you I would think a bit more before I reacted with an emotional tantrum.

Here is what your narrative would have been if Dak had been the QB in these games you referenced.

"How can you expect any QB to win when the defense gives up 274 rushing yards?" Washington 2012

"How can you expect a QB to win when the defense gives up a 96 yard drive, an 80 yard drive and a 68 yard drive to score 21 points in the first half?" New York 2011

"How can you expect any QB to win when the defense gives up 27 points in the first half?" Philadelphia 2008

The double standards and hypocrisy are off the charts with you knuckleheads. Every one of those "reasons" has been used by you geniuses to excuse Dak.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

If I were you I would think a bit more before I reacted with an emotional tantrum.

Here is what your narrative would have been if Dak had been the QB in these games you referenced.

"How can you expect any QB to win when the defense gives up 274 rushing yards?" Washington 2012

"How can you expect a QB to win when the defense gives up a 96 yard drive, an 80 yard drive and a 68 yard drive to score 21 points in the first half?" New York 2011

"How can you expect any QB to win when the defense gives up 27 points in the first half?" Philadelphia 2008

The double standards and hypocrisy are off the charts with you knuckleheads. Every one of those "reasons" has been used by you geniuses to excuse Dak.

wow, you just skipped everything and went to emotional meltdown, yet your post is reeked with nothing but emotions. wow, talking about being emotional. you even went to quotes...4 times.

likely set of excuses....you just said how can a QB win when defense gives up 274 yards rushing, yet Rams had 275 yards rushing against cowboys and all the blame went to Dak.
and this is not defending Dak, its just as you said stats of what happened. so both QBs came up short. end of story.

, they couldn't get it done.

btw, against Philly we gave up ton of points. but only scored 6...perhaps if we scored 14 in the first half, then maybe, just maybe the team has a chance.

and the point I have made all along is trying to choose which crap smelled less....in the end it smells.

 

[Vtwin]

wow, you just skipped everything and went to emotional meltdown, yet your post is nothing but emotions.

likely set of excuses....you just said how can a QB win when defense gives up 274 yards rushing, yet Rams had 275 yards rushing against cowboys and all the blame went to Dak.
and this is not defending Dak, its just as you said stats of what happened. so both QBs came up short. end of story.

, they couldn't get it done.

btw, against Philly we gave up ton of points. but only scored 6...perhaps if we scored 14 in the first half, then maybe, just maybe the team has a chance.

and the point I have made all along is trying to choose which crap smelled less....in the end it smells.

lol

You can't even interpret the point my very straightforward post made. Or maybe you just consciously choose to gaslight with your attempt at revisionist history.

The point was that the very same excuses you guys, (and no, you don't get to ignore all the historical context and exclude yourself from the Dak Defender club) have undeniably used to defend Dak's playoff failures are not extended to Romo when they undeniably are equally as relevant.

I especially love how you oh so cluelessly double down with that gibberish about "maybe if we scored more..." but somehow are able to miss the giant, flashing, firework spewing billboard of hypocrisy that is attached to that statement.

That's the problem with living and dying on your ego alone. It can lead to irrational and emotional thinking that leaves you looking silly, at best.

I should state for the record, so your emotions don't lead you to an incorrect assumption, I am not defending or attacking either QB here. I'm just pointing out how irrational and emotional some of you are.

 

[CowboyFrog]

To bad neither had a real FO that cared about winning....Mahomes cant carry the Jones to a trophy ..Facts....

 

[McKDaddy]

Mahomes cant carry the Jones to a trophy ..Facts....

But the simpletons would create the narrative that Mahomes was trash.

Their minds can't conceive evaluating the QB's play regardless of outcome.