Dak's career OT stats

[kskboys]

All QBs make bad throws and yes that throw was definitely low but it hit him in both hands. I would have cut him yesterday because struggled to lean down and catch that ball. He looked like a LB playing WR.

Cut a stellar STer? Why? You don't realize he's only playing because everyone is hurt? No joke?

 

[kskboys]

defense choked they were on the field last and gave up the big penalty plays that gave an easy fg for the win..

corrected it for you..

if the defense played better and the refs were better at their job this is a 10 point win for us..facts..
sorry of you dont get the team concept but heres clues

Jackson had 4INt, 13 points fielded and his team won..

dak had zero TOs and put up 28 points and lost..

Jackson sucked, but Mayfield sucked worse.

 

[Nav22]

The anti-Dak crowd knows better than NFL players, coaches and front office personnel.

These groups were each separately polled this past offseason, and each group listed Dak as a top 8 QB.

 

[blueblood70]

Jackson sucked, but Mayfield sucked worse.

that not why

the defenses played better on both sides kept it close and made up for bad offense's..ours choked no defense showed in the Denver game, bucs game, and the raiders game..its far more the issue than Dak,,.thats my point.its a fact.

 

[kskboys]

Egads this is some lowbrow dumb stuff.

 

[kskboys]

that not why

the defenses played better on both sides kept it close and made up for bad offense's..ours choked no defense showed in the Denver game, bucs game, and the raiders game..its far more the issue than Dak,,.thats my point.its a fact.

No, if Mayfield plays even decent, they win.

 

[aikemirv]

defense choked they were on the field last and gave up the big penalty plays that gave an easy fg for the win..

corrected it for you..

if the defense played better and the refs were better at their job this is a 10 point win for us..facts..
sorry of you dont get the team concept but heres clues

Jackson had 4INt, 13 points fielded and his team won..

dak had zero TOs and put up 28 points and lost..

A Brown made a better Defensive play that got called PI than Dak did on the pass in OT! Actually pretty much all of A Browns PI calls were better plays than Daks choke job in OT!

 

[khiladi]

Dak’s numbers shot up in the fourth because they went up tempo and hurry up against an opponent they play once every now and then and they Raiders keeping everything in front.

Don’t count on that happening against a good defense, let alone the 30th ranked scoring defense.

 

[khiladi]

No, if Mayfield plays even decent, they win.

Mayfield went 11-5 last year, made the play-offs and won a play-off game with good OL blocking and RG in a much harder division.

 

[blueblood70]

A Brown made a better Defensive play that got called PI than Dak did on the pass in OT!

not fact thats your wmouitnal and vERY WRONG Opinion..

the defense is why we lost this game out side of the refs..sorry its fact its right there to see OT should have never happened..those are facts the defense gave up 36 points and why we lost by THREE(3) all the way to the last play the defense sucked..got it..?

 

[kskboys]

Mayfield went 11-5 last year with good OL blocking and RG in a much harder division.

And a great D and stellar running game. Pure bus driver.

 

[G2]

3 total games, two of them against the same opponent, prior to this game, going 18-18.

Basically dink and dunk against the Texans, going a whopping 3-3 only to punt and give the ball to the Texans who then scored, meaning they lost.

2 of them against the Eagles, one of them as a bus driver in 2017 when Zeke was dominating and teams were completely set on stuffing Zeke, the other in 2018, further, meaning both against Jim Schwartz who never bothered to play anything but one safety man on the outside against Dak. The 2018 game was the infamous one where Amari bailed Dak out and had to yell at Dak to throw him the ball, becayse CBs we’re just sitting the routes with no safety help over the top.

One of those ‘accurate’ OT passes was his typical 1 read throw that never should have been made on a 3rd and 8, with the Db having clear inside possession and once again, no safety to even help and a lucky bounce after the defender hit it.

False. Might want to refresh.

 

[khiladi]

And a great D and stellar running game. Pure bus driver.

Statistically, they were 20th in scoring defense. So I wouldn’t say they were good.

Look I get the “this is our formula” and I believe we can win with it argument, but Dak is not elite. He’s ‘good’ in respect to guys like Hurts and Mayfield, but that’s not saying much. Mayfield last year showed you basically 2016 is not an anomaly.

 

[blueblood70]

Dak’s numbers shot up in the fourth because they went up tempo and hurry up against an opponent they play once every now and then and they Raiders keeping everything in front.

Don’t count on that happening against a good defense, let alone the 30th ranked scoring defense.

it all counts they tied the game, how does that not count, those are NOT even close to be classified as garbage points. thats dumb, so ignorant, its insane to see it in writing,..,the defenses both sucked 36-33 score proves it!!

our offense didn't turn the ball over, so its all on the refs and defense not or QB or offense..sorry but the facts are all there..

some teams play up tempo all 60 mins soem half some late how does that freaking matter, the defenses still on the field and have to stop the offenses. They couldn't, dak lit them up late, tied it got to OT,.that's all that matters..the defense once again failed in the OT ..they were the reason we lost and its clear and obvious..

 

[khiladi]

it all counts they tied the game, how does that not count, those are NOT even close to be classified as garbage points. thats dumb, so ignorant, its insane to see it in writing,..,the defenses both sucked 36-33 score proves it!!

our offense didn't turn the ball over, so its all on the refs and defense not or QB or offense..sorry but the facts are all there..

some teams play up tempo all 60 mins soem half some late how does that freaking matter, the defenses still on the field and have to stop the offenses. They couldn't, dak lit them up late, tied it got to OT,.that's all that matters..the defense once again failed in the OT ..they were the reason we lost and its clear and obvious..

I didn’t say it was garbage points, I’m only pointing the context. Strategically, defenses may play that way, to keep everything inside and burn time, not wanting to give up the big play. Even Romo was saying when you aren’t playing a familiar opponent on a short week like this, these are the type of situation where defenses can give up a lot of yards.

When we went into OT, there was no more hurry-up and Dak basically took everything underneath.

They threw it three times that close to the the defenses territory and two of those passes were to an injured Zeke, he still gave them a manageable 3rd down.

 

[blueblood70]

I didn’t say it was garbage points, I’m only pointing the context.

no you are making ridiculous points. Its part of all offenses and whatever they run its up to the defense to stop, period..that it no matter what formations and tempo we ran and at what point of the game we ran it, its their job is to stop it an they didn't..

 

[khiladi]

no you are making ridiculous points. Its part of all offenses and whatever they run its up to the defense to stop, period..that it no matter what formations and tempo we ran and at what point of the game we ran it, its their job is to stop it an they didn't..

And Dak chucked an awful pass in OT when we didn’t go hurry up.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

2016…. Or it could just be a typo..

You got caught lying again lol?

 

[ondaedg]

Cut a stellar STer? Why? You don't realize he's only playing because everyone is hurt? No joke?

How many balls has he dropped already in limited playing time? He can play STs all day but he is not an NFL WR.

 

[Vtwin]

Of course @khiladi removed the Dak Hate Fine print from your article.

First, we have to establish our working definition of clutch.

To get a true sense of it, you can forget the traditional “fourth-quarter comeback” or “game-winning drive” metrics, which are far too liberal and credit a quarterback for scores anytime in the fourth quarter. You can also forget “one-score game” totals, which can be diluted because an offense will operate far differently if playing for a field goal rather than a touchdown.

A true “clutch” situation should be viewed as when a team is down 4-8 points late in a game, when they need a touchdown.


So according to this article a true sense of Clutch is down by 4-8 points needing a TD

If you drive and get a FG - NOT CLUTCH

If you drive and Kicker misses a Game winning FG - NOT CLUTCH

If You are down by 4 points and drive for 2 late FGS - NOT CLUTCH

Dak Haters are cherry-picking, Goal Post Moving no,

Just for reference sake.

The definition of "clutch", and the factors that lead to what is considered a notable "come from behind" win have changed pretty drastically in my time watching football.

Used to be there had to be a significant element of improbability attached to be considered a legit comeback win. Being one score down at the start of the fourth quarter and eventually winning wouldn't have gotten a mention as a notable comeback victory. Nor would hitting a few passes to get the 40 yards needed to kick the game winner.

Clutch is thrown around way to easily in this era of stats rule all.