Risen Star
Likes Collector
- Messages
- 98,993
- Reaction score
- 251,152
What pocket presence?
that would be a better QB coach to work with him on his footwork, drops, etc. not an OC
QB's read D's by their 3rd year or they get replaced. And I didn't mean Romo was good at it early on, he got played by DC's a lot.Romo went to a 1-AA school and sat on the bench for 2.5 years before he ever saw the field. And my point is he gambled way too much early on, its a bad comparison to say 3rd year Dak Prescott should be making line adjustments like 12th year Tony Romo.
Absolutely right. And one of those fumbles, the one they recovered, his own man prevented him from actually throwing the ball so he tried to pull it back. We ( at least ) need the middle to be well protected so he can step up.Sometimes theres just a whole bunch of bug guys surrounding him wether that be his own OL or opposing DL that dont give him anywhere to go. More then a few times on them 7 sacks guys were on top of his shortly after the snap because of protection breakdown.
Now he does have times where he just cant take a snap, but when he's in the pocket he cant just throw it away. Theres a yellow flag the refs are holding that will go flying.
Romo was 6 years in when he was given full immunity to do as please. Dak is 2.7 years in.Ask Romo about "modifying the game". He played behind worse OL's than this one and he either had to improvise or get hammered.
Not necessarily. Ask Troy Aikman. He credits the Cowboys early 90s OC Norv Turner with coaching his drop back skills more than anyone.that would be a better QB coach to work with him on his footwork, drops, etc. not an OC
Dak is 6'2" and he doesn't have exceptionally tall receivers and some of these strip sacks look like he's unaware they're even close until they're right on top of him. He's trying to stay ready to throw and therefore doesn't have good ball security and the worst part is the D's know it.
So, how about a deeper drop to give him better field sight and awareness of the rush. To his credit, he is staying focused downfield and trying to make a play but that affects his pocket presence and he does not have that 6th sense some QB's have when the pocket is getting ready to collapse.
They need to do something because now that is game plan 1 for the D because they see how he's exposed on film.
The other thing they can do is a moving pocket, the OL seems athletic enough to do that.
Last night, 7 sacks and 2 fumbles as a result, not going to win many games against good teams with that stat.
I am not saying the OC isn't involved but a lot of the repetition and work and feedback comes from QB coach.....his footwork, his throwing, etc are all about repetition and becoming second nature....some of the other stuff in regards to using his eyes, moving around the pocket, etc.....are OC and QB coach...it usually takes the village. so perhaps Aikman credit him but the QB coach probably worked with him...can't imagine OC having enough time to do all of that.Not necessarily. Ask Troy Aikman. He credits the Cowboys early 90s OC Norv Turner with coaching his drop back skills more than anyone.
The QB coach of course helps, but it’s usually the OC that determines the design of a play and how he wants his QB to execute. I’ve never seen a great OC not being involved with teaching his QBs how he wants footwork and drop backs done.
Sure, but it was Norv Turner who fixed Aikman’s problems. Because Norv was the OC AND QB coach. There was no other QBs coach.I am not saying the OC isn't involved but a lot of the repetition and work and feedback comes from QB coach.....his footwork, his throwing, etc are all about repetition and becoming second nature....some of the other stuff in regards to using his eyes, moving around the pocket, etc.....are OC and QB coach...it usually takes the village. so perhaps Aikman credit him but the QB coach probably worked with him...can't imagine OC having enough time to do all of that.
That’s debatable since the offense could still recover the fumble, but they’re both bad.Strip sacks are not better than picks because of the location on the field, most of the time.
If you're gonna compare him to Romo, shouldn't you compare him to Romo in his third year as a starter?Romo went to a 1-AA school and sat on the bench for 2.5 years before he ever saw the field. And my point is he gambled way too much early on, its a bad comparison to say 3rd year Dak Prescott should be making line adjustments like 12th year Tony Romo.
We had more pressure on Brees, but only two sacks.I mean, you saw what pressure can do to a QB last night, DREW BREES. You get pressure in a guys face, then a bunch of idiots sitting on their couch thinks you can just throw the ball anyways.
Dak is 6'2" and he doesn't have exceptionally tall receivers and some of these strip sacks look like he's unaware they're even close until they're right on top of him. He's trying to stay ready to throw and therefore doesn't have good ball security and the worst part is the D's know it.
So, how about a deeper drop to give him better field sight and awareness of the rush. To his credit, he is staying focused downfield and trying to make a play but that affects his pocket presence and he does not have that 6th sense some QB's have when the pocket is getting ready to collapse.
They need to do something because now that is game plan 1 for the D because they see how he's exposed on film.
The other thing they can do is a moving pocket, the OL seems athletic enough to do that.
Last night, 7 sacks and 2 fumbles as a result, not going to win many games against good teams with that stat.
If you're gonna compare him to Romo, shouldn't you compare him to Romo in his third year as a starter?
