On one hand, is there a DT in this draft worth a 10 pick? On the other, does that matter?
The majority of posters were pissed when they took Yosemite with a 1st but he solved a problem and that is what the draft is all about. Who cares about draft values, that's ridiculous. Anyone here regret taking him where they did? I wouldn't have cared if they'd traded up for him.
I haven't seen enough of Gallimore and Hill is even a bigger ?
There are those that feel drafting for need equals reaching but what if that player works out, what if he solves the problem? We can argue Yosemite was a reach but in the end, was he?
The Cowboys run D is terrible and it is specifically terrible in the middle but they are not getting rid of Booger's cornerstone of his defense, I wonder if he's really looked at that defense? Yep, a MLB making tackles 5 yards down the field is the cornerstone of it.
If Barmore is the highest graded DT, take him. The only chance for that to happen with the guy doing the picking is if Farley and Surtain are gone and even then I do not see Booger taking a DT with a 1st rounder, he never has and this isn't the first year that's been an obvious need.
And if you want to look for one statement that sums up the futility of this ball club it is "we like our guys".