Dallas refused to address LB in the draft or the offseason

we aren't a real team on d. We are an assembly of individuals that are watching out for their own business model. Couldn't be more obvious. I think Von Miller and Quinnen, Clark are fine, but we have nothing much around them honestly. On the back 7 its gawd awful outside of Downs. Nobody played well back there. A true organizational loss and failure week 1.
 
I don’t need numbers to back up what I saw last year and last night
Then why use them?

Last year we had 20% of the talent we have now. Eberflus is laughing.

Eight new starters with a DC who is 34 and never called players before. They didn't play a single down in preseason.

Didn't help that the Giants feel in three of their own fumbles either.

And no, the offense didn't help much either, which it seemingly never does in games like that.
 


Well you reap what you sow. Not sure how anyone in the FO or coaching staff watched last year and thought it was a good idea to not treat it as a top priority, especially for a position that relatively is inexpensive to invest resources in

It’s been reported they tried for numerous FA LB but they chose to sign elsewhere.
 
Then why use them?

Last year we had 20% of the talent we have now. Eberflus is laughing.

Eight new starters with a DC who is 34 and never called players before. They didn't play a single down in preseason.

Didn't help that the Giants feel in three of their own fumbles either.

And no, the offense didn't help much either, which it seemingly never does in games like that.
I used them to drive home a point. I’m not arguing any of the points you made, however when you turnover JAGs with more JAGs why would you expect different results?

I agree. Offense was disappointing but I’m less inclined to worry about that side of the ball. They’ll figure it out
 
I used them to drive home a point. I’m not arguing any of the points you made, however when you turnover JAGs with more JAGs why would you expect different results?

I agree. Offense was disappointing but I’m less inclined to worry about that side of the ball. They’ll figure it out
They're not JAGs. They're rookies, and free agents who have never player together in a new scheme with a new DC.

The Giants almost committed 5 turnovers the first half. There was some productivity that just didn't bounce Dallas's way.

The two possession swing at the half did them in. They were exhausted after that.
 
They're not JAGs. They're rookies, and free agents who have never player together in a new scheme with a new DC.

The Giants almost committed 5 turnovers the first half. There was some productivity that just didn't bounce Dallas's way.

The two possession swing at the half did them in. They were exhausted after that.
I understand. I would like to see the guys succeed. My overall point is when you aren’t willing to spend real assets whether it be dollars or high draft picks you’re going to end up with guys that do not produce results. You have to have patience but patience is for teams that are rebuilding. We are not structured as a rebuilding team. That is the problem to me
 
I understand. I would like to see the guys succeed. My overall point is when you aren’t willing to spend real assets whether it be dollars or high draft picks you’re going to end up with guys that do not produce results. You have to have patience but patience is for teams that are rebuilding. We are not structured as a rebuilding team. That is the problem to me
I agree with that. I'm just a huge hater of PFF (and statistical arguments in general), so I was picking on you a bit. My apologies.

This team needs disciplined team defense. The sooner the start playing that way, the sooner they start winning.
 


Well you reap what you sow. Not sure how anyone in the FO or coaching staff watched last year and thought it was a good idea to not treat it as a top priority, especially for a position that relatively is inexpensive to invest resources in

Our front office is a bunch of amateurs playing fantasy football.
 


Well you reap what you sow. Not sure how anyone in the FO or coaching staff watched last year and thought it was a good idea to not treat it as a top priority, especially for a position that relatively is inexpensive to invest resources in

They drafted Barham in the third round and also traded for Winters.

Maybe you just disagree with the choices they made?
 
I agree with that. I'm just a huge hater of PFF (and statistical arguments in general), so I was picking on you a bit. My apologies.

This team needs disciplined team defense. The sooner the start playing that way, the sooner they start winning.
To be fair I don’t like PFF either. No worries my friend. We are all on the same boat for better or worse lol
 


Well you reap what you sow. Not sure how anyone in the FO or coaching staff watched last year and thought it was a good idea to not treat it as a top priority, especially for a position that relatively is inexpensive to invest resources in

Well.

If Drafting Barham and trading for Winters is ignoring it, sure.

They also took a swing in FA on a couple and lost out for various reasons.

But go ahead and tell us again how it was ignored.
 
They will be the starters very soon. And good ones.
Winters is a backup, Overshown has proven he cant stay healthy. I like Barham but he’s a rookie 3rd rounder.

Its been a few years since we were forced to start a couple of DBs at LB. Still haven’t adequately addressed the position. Typical of Jerruh
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
475,393
Messages
14,609,251
Members
24,218
Latest member
Jdeebull
Back
Top