Dan Connor released

WoodysGirl;5019623 said:
They weren't trying to restructure in the traditional sense. They asked him to take a pay cut. Not quite the same.

Honestly, I'm just glad he is off the team. He was a liability out there when he played. Heck Keith Brooking at 37 years old played better in Denver.
 
ufcrules1;5019619 said:
lol.. i swear I always agree with your opinions on here. When I heard they were probably going to restructure him, I was like why? So ridiculous.

I'm also not happy about keeping Scandrick but is what it is.

Your not happy about them keeping the best tackler in the secondary and our only slot corner. Plus jenkins is gone. Ummm ok?? granted he is overpaid but hes damn good.
 
StarBoyz83;5019645 said:
Your not happy about them keeping the best tackler in the secondary and our only slot corner. Plus jenkins is gone. Ummm ok?? granted he is overpaid but hes damn good.

Best tackler in the secondary because the better tacklers were injured. He is damn good? haha.. well let him go be "damn good" some where else.
 
Good to see Connor get the axe. Wasn't worth the coin that the Cowboys were paying him. I rather rolled the dice on a rookie than keep giving Connor money.

Scandrick isn't a All pro CB but he plays with heart out there on the field. I don't mind Dallas keeping him if we can work it out on the books. Just if he can stay healthy
 
It really shouldn't even have been a question of money, the guy was a liability.
 
supercowboy8;5019510 said:
Be almost pointless to release spears. Will only be a 600000 savings, I would rather have him as a 4-3 depth

I don't think he's a good fit, so I'll take that $600,000.
 
pupulehaole;5019833 said:
Why has Doug Free not been released yet?

Too many variables at play to cut a guy who has started at both tackle positions just yet. But yes, he should go eventually......
 
He was an insurance policy anyway when we had NO idea what we had in Carter.

I'm glad that turned out ok. :)
 
ufcrules1;5019619 said:
lol.. i swear I always agree with your opinions on here. When I heard they were probably going to restructure him, I was like why? So ridiculous.

I'm also not happy about keeping Scandrick but is what it is.

What a concept, negative agrees with negative.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,012
Messages
14,506,494
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top