Cowboysheelsreds053
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 15,750
- Reaction score
- 11,033
Same exact thing could be said of Tebow.
LLLOOLLL
Same exact thing could be said of Tebow.
Dak has three years of experience. Two of those years Dak has under preformed. I don't know why he was as good as he was the other year. A team built for Tony? I think Tony's career was magical in a lot of ways. I haven't seen anything magical from Dak.
If Dak underperformed then tony shouldn’t even be 3rd stringDak has three years of experience. Two of those years Dak has under preformed. I don't know why he was as good as he was the other year. A team built for Tony? I think Tony's career was magical in a lot of ways. I haven't seen anything magical from Dak.
Apparently, you don't know what a logical fallacy is. Also, nebulously referring me to some videos that exist somewhere on the Internet doesn't prove the "choker" label. Every QB has thrown interceptions with the game on the line. Every QB has failed to "make plays" when they had to. By such an unspecific definition of "choked", every QB that has failed to win a game has "choked", and by extension, every QB that has failed to win a SB has "choked".That's also a fallacy. The proof is in the indisputable tape posted all over youtube and other various media outlets. I don't need to quote every instance of someone pointing it out or a recording of him throwing an inopportune interception to know that the evidence exists and can't be dissproved. The narrative of him being a choker didn't formulate over night.
Tape is all you need. And it exists in abundance. I'll just refer to the multiple instances it is posted on cowboyszone and leave you to keep denying the obvious.
Same exact thing could be said of Tebow.
Apparently, you don't know what a logical fallacy is. Also, nebulously referring me to some videos that exist somewhere on the Internet doesn't prove the "choker" label. Every QB has thrown interceptions with the game on the line. Every QB has failed to "make plays" when they had to. By such an unspecific definition of "choked", every QB that has failed to win a game has "choked", and by extension, every QB that has failed to win a SB has "choked".
Regardless, I'll repeat my assertion. None of those alleged videos that you refer to - if they even exist - likely have a definition of what a "a choker" is. None of these likely ever show how Tony Romo "choked" more than other QBs in such situations.
What the hell does the HOF have to do with anything? It has absolutely nothing to do with the "choker" label. That's exactly what I mean about a red herring.Your incessant diatribe isn't going to get Romo any closer to the HOF.
And yes, saying "No one" says this, or "no one" does that is another form of appealing to the bandwagon/majority. It's a useless premise. You can deny the evidence exists, but it's what is going to keep Romo out of the HOF and makes him a lesser QB than Eli.
What the hell does the HOF have to do with anything? It has absolutely nothing to do with the "choker" label. That's exactly what I mean about a red herring.
And no, saying "no one" has shown something is not appealing to the bandwagon at all. It is not a non-popular opinion that Romo was a choker. It is actually quite a popular opinion, especially among non-Cowboys fan. What I said was just an assertion that's easy to disprove by pointing to a single instance of evidence where someone defines what it means to be "choker" and how Tony Romo has "choked" more than other QBs.
I know it breaks your heart but your bae wasn't that great, sorry. Good? Sure. Really good? Ok. But great like Marino, Archie, and Fouts?! NOPE
Again with the red herrings. Now Romo is my "bae" in addition to being some invisible claim that he's a HOFamer and great. None of these things have to do with showing how he is a "choker".
As much as you're defending his honor in the midst of a live game pretty much says it.
just another example of a mediot trying to spin a narrative that isn't true.
It's closer than people make it out to be, but no. Just pointing out that those traits don't mean that much.You are not seriously comparing Dak and Tebow as QBs are you? That is a lazy, uniformed, ignorant comparison if you are...
That's fair, I was probably being too harsh on Woody.I wouldn’t say mediot, he’s just a fan. There are people here who think the same and they aren’t media.
It's closer than people make it out to be, but no. Just pointing out that those traits don't mean that much
"Dak...something about the It factor"
"Dak..a leader"
"Dak..not the pocket passer that Romo is"
"Romo''' had a select click and was the leader of a select few"
"from a passer perspective Romo better"
"from a leader perspective Dak is a leader of men"
"Romo's story is about him, Dak's is about the team"
I'll add one other. Romo reached deity-like status after he retired. Prior to 2015 the love/hate relationship and incessant media rants were AS strong for Romo the QB as it is for Prescott the QB.