You were "accused" of presenting something with no support. Which was, in fact, true. I asked you to support what you were claiming and all you did was to get indignant.
If you're now looking for an apology, you've got one. I apologize for my part in that.
Actually I wasn't calling you out. You don't owe me an apology. Actually, Im sort of poking fun at the CONCEPT that if you don't give some supporting information it is an attempt to create some sort of fictitious ruse.
Sometimes people are on the cutting edge. Rather than try to say they are creating rumors we should listen to what they say and see what happens.
If you said something that was totally out there with or without substantiation it would not make any difference at all to me. I would assume that as an established poster here that you were telling what you knew and you were doing it in good faith. But that's just me.
I told everyone on the front edge that the drafting of Zeke sounded like a foregone conclusion by people in the know and received all sorts of skepticism. I guess that's fine, but who would make something like that up, right?
Its all good. Don't sweat it. Just keep in mind that even when something is strictly and opinion, and it is the minority view, hindsight may prove it accurate.
