LatinMind;1404960 said:how relaxing do u think romo is going to feel now that he can take 7 step drops without having to scramble for his life?
burmafrd;1404965 said:If we get Colombo back, and Davis is at guard then we are ok. As long as we can motivate him and he can keep his weight down.
burmafrd;1404765 said:On this board not one single person was sad to see him go. They also claim that it was a missed block by davis that resulted in the injury to Leinarts shoulder that knocked him out of the last two games.
http://www.azcentral.com/phorum/read.php?10000,644117,page=1
Bleu Star;1404969 said:Romo will be in heaven just as soon as we finish wrapping up Colombo. He's happy right now though. That's a definite.
dwmyers;1404974 said:"The highest blocking percentage by a Cardinals offensive lineman was 85.5% by Leonard Davis"
K.C. Joyner, Scientific Football 2006.
That isn't to the 90% of Flo Adams of 2006 but I suspect only Kosier and Flo are in that range this year.
David.
But you are also talking about the team that let Jay Novacek walk away free and clear. That didn't turn out so well for them either did it?burmafrd;1404895 said:As long as the Pollyanna types can see nothing wrong with this signing, I won't stop reminding them of all the "IFs".
skinsngibbs4life;1404471 said:whats wrong with hoping he will play tackle for you all? please tell me how that is taking a shot at your organization..
ill be waiting...
burmafrd;1404871 said:You guys just do not want to face the FACT that this guy is not a quality tackle- he is no better if as good as Colombo. At guard- fine- if they can motivate him and keep him playing hard. BUT NOT AT TACKLE.
burmafrd;1404936 said:I hope we do NOT put him at tackle- I see disaster coming if we do.
I see a pattern here.burmafrd;1404965 said:If we get Colombo back, and Davis is at guard then we are ok. As long as we can motivate him and he can keep his weight down.
big dog cowboy;1405039 said:I see a pattern here.
ScipioCowboy;1405022 said:It's really quite simple. You denigrated Davis' ability to play tackle, and Davis is now a member of the Cowboys. Ergo, you "took a shot" at the Cowboy organization, albeit indirectly.
You're certainly free to argue that, because your comment contained nothing overtly derogatory, any criticism against you is unwarranted. However, that argument smacks of cowardice as the context of your comment was clearly negative.
skinsngibbs4life;1405056 said:however, the guy just wont cut it at tackle. Which obviously is why I want him to play tackle for you all. Nothing wrong with wanting him wo play at a weaker position
theogt;1404638 said:Well, we did just change head coaches. Davis is a bit of an anomaly, though. Players with his size, strength, and athleticism are so rare you can't build a philosophy around them.
Lol...nice attack...down boy:dissskin:headhunterroy05;1404404 said:It wouldn't make a bit of difference where he played against your teams pass rush.
ScipioCowboy;1405175 said:Nothing wrong with it all, nor is there anything wrong with a poster "taking a shot" at the Dallas organization, at least in my opinion. I was merely responding to your "show me" challenge: By denigrating Davis' ability to play tackle (and he was drafted as a tackle), you were criticizing a member of the Cowboys and, by association, the Cowboy organization.
skinsngibbs4life;1405208 said:the whole "show me" thing was in response to someone saying that I took a shot at the cowboys.
I don't really think it is a real secret that he has troubles at tackle. Many people on here have even said this. While he might be an ok starter at tackle, i think it's pretty obvious that his better position would be guard.