Death Star Destroys Enterprise

[ROMOSAPIEN9]

[youtube]3KRc7fn434Y[/youtube]

 

[burmafrd]

hah. Star Trek was always technically much more advanced.
It was a huge thing for Star Wars to destroy a planet. With anti matter you could do that easily in star trek. Transporters; nothing like that in Star Wars. Sheilding technology was also much advanced. The Enterprise could destroy the Death Star by herself easily. Every time Star Wars fans try to debate Star Trek fans on which universe is more advanced they lose all the time.

 

[ScipioCowboy]

hah. Star Trek was always technically much more advanced.
It was a huge thing for Star Wars to destroy a planet. With anti matter you could do that easily in star trek. Transporters; nothing like that in Star Wars. Sheilding technology was also much advanced. The Enterprise could destroy the Death Star by herself easily. Every time Star Wars fans try to debate Star Trek fans on which universe is more advanced they lose all the time.

This is undoubtedly true.

The Enterprise would detect the Death Star's power buildup long before the beam was fired, and maneuver safely out of the way; the Death Star can only fire in one direction, and Star Fleet capital ships are far more maneuverable than their Imperial or Alliance counterparts.

After retreating to a safe position, the Enterprise would perform a sensor scan, identify the Death Star's critical weakness (since all Death Stars have one), and destroy it with a homing photon torpedo.

Easy as cake.

 

[SultanOfSix]

This is undoubtedly true.

The Enterprise would detect the Death Star's power buildup long before the beam was fired, and maneuver safely out of the way; the Death Star can only fire in one direction, and Star Fleet capital ships are far more maneuverable than their Imperial or Alliance counterparts.

After retreating to a safe position, the Enterprise would perform a sensor scan, identify the Death Star's critical weakness (since all Death Stars have one), and destroy it with a homing photon torpedo.

Easy as cake.

Your signature tells me your biased.

 

[ScipioCowboy]

Your signature tells me your biased.

And your assumption would be correct.

 

[burmafrd]

different Universes have different laws of physics is probably the best way too explain it.

One thing that puzzles me about both Battlestar Galactica and Star Wars= how could there be so little technological progress in thousands of years? If you look at the first Movie through Return of the Jedi, which I guess is around 40 years total, there seems to be no technological progress at all. On BG, its mentioned several times that the Galactica is hundreds of years old and it seems that technology has not changed much.
Meanwhile on Star Trek its very clear that technology advances constantly.

 

[tomson75]

Nerds.

Only a bunch of super geeks would EVER think that Star Trek is superior to Star Wars in any facet. Trekkies are dorks!

 

[Yeagermeister]

different Universes have different laws of physics is probably the best way too explain it.

One thing that puzzles me about both Battlestar Galactica and Star Wars= how could there be so little technological progress in thousands of years? If you look at the first Movie through Return of the Jedi, which I guess is around 40 years total, there seems to be no technological progress at all. On BG, its mentioned several times that the Galactica is hundreds of years old and it seems that technology has not changed much.
Meanwhile on Star Trek its very clear that technology advances constantly.

If you are referring to the new version of BSG that was part of the plot. The more advanced ships were destroyed in the Cyclon attacked because they were "networked" together.

 

[Faerluna]

Nerds.

Only a bunch of super geeks would EVER think that Star Trek is superior to Star Wars in any facet. Trekkies are dorks!

I prefer the term "geek," thank you.

 

[the kid 05]

different Universes have different laws of physics is probably the best way too explain it.

One thing that puzzles me about both Battlestar Galactica and Star Wars= how could there be so little technological progress in thousands of years? If you look at the first Movie through Return of the Jedi, which I guess is around 40 years total, there seems to be no technological progress at all. On BG, its mentioned several times that the Galactica is hundreds of years old and it seems that technology has not changed much.
Meanwhile on Star Trek its very clear that technology advances constantly.

we are supposta be more technologically advanced then we are today, ya know that? Damn Dark ages ruined everything

 

[Ren]

Nerds.

Only a bunch of super geeks would EVER think that Star Trek is superior to Star Wars in any facet. Trekkies are dorks!

Trekkies are to nerds what nerds are to normal people

 

[burmafrd]

Only a true moron would ever even consider the possibility that Star Wars technology is in any way comparable to Star Trek technology.

As regards BG, the point was that not only was the Galactica hundreds of years old, so were a lot of the fleet. So what if they advanced a little since what 200 years ago? WOW= they finally figured out networking after having computers for HOW LONG?

 

[tomson75]

Only a true moron would ever even consider the possibility that Star Wars technology is in any way comparable to Star Trek technology.

Only a true loser would even care.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

who got burm all wound up?

 

[tomson75]

who got burm all wound up?

He's probably all worked up because I said Trekkies are dorks.....as if that were some new revelation. Everyone on earth (the real one, not the one with alternate physical properties, you Trekkie nerds) knows that.

 

[WarC]

Star Wars > Star Trek

 

[kristie]

tha video....:laugh2:

 

[burmafrd]

and of course your opinion means SO much tommy baby. NOT.

So you calling anyone dorks or nerds is actually a compliment considering the source.

 

[tomson75]

and of course your opinion means SO much tommy baby. NOT.

So you calling anyone dorks or nerds is actually a compliment considering the source.

For someone that drives such big and bad trucks, you sure are a wuss. Live long and prosper. Dork.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

For someone that drives such big and bad trucks, you sure are a wuss. Live long and prosper. Dork.