tyke1doe
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 54,310
- Reaction score
- 32,716
JFlgn;2494481 said:Reporting isn't just telling everyone what "sources" said. It's corroberating information from a number of sources to get the most honest story in print.
It's clear that Werder propelled only the sources that made the story he wanted to tell instead of checking and rechecking with everyone in the organization, namely, T.O., Witten and Romo, to form an honest, complete story.
Irresponsible journalism without a doubt.
How do you know he didn't check with Witten and Romo?
T.O. wasn't talking to him, so he doesn't count.
Werder isn't going to reveal his sources. His source very well could have been Romo and Witten. Even if they act as if they didn't know what was going on, that could be a misdirection. Ed Werder isn't going to rat them out. Neither is he going to be bother by them saying he was wrong when he could have gotten his information from them.
That's the nature of the anonymous source and the reporter.
Second, you say it's irresponsible journalism. And that's because you believe that everyone in the Cowboys organization is telling the truth.
Obviously, the Cowboys aren't going to come out and say, "Yep, it's true. T.O. is jealous of Witten and Romo. He went to the coaches to complain that Witten is getting more passes. He dissed Witten on the practice field."
Pulease. The Cowboys are going to try to minimize this even if it were a major division.
And it's not like every other media outlet in Dallas didn't confirm the story. There was enough truth to the story to validate Werder's initial story. It's just that people didn't like the fact it went public. And now that T.O. is saying Werder made it up, many want to agree with him because they'd rather this not be a distraction. And that's easier to do after a win.