Smashin222
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 776
- Reaction score
- 386
The distinction I make when judging them fair is:
1. Are they timely?
2. Is the commentator operating within his role?
To 1.) Yes. Deion's criticism came during Romo's playing career. And it's not like Deion was the only one criticizing Romo's ability to win the big one or his penchant for critical interceptions. Many were, including those on this forum.
To 2.) Deion is a football commentator. He's a very poor analysis, IMO, but he is one, nevertheless. And what he said about Romo wasn't out of the blue, as I noted above.
Fair enough. But I thought I read you say Romo's criticism flowed from natural conversation, which I doubt. He was looking to get a dig in, and did it quite masterfully.
I don't know the context, but if theirs were just as critical as Romo's then the same applies to them.
So the viewers who watched Deion play couldn't have come up with this obvious observation sans Romo's help?
So Deion is the only corner who has ducked tackling a ball carrier?
So Deion's tackling skills are relevant?
Is he still playing?
Does ANYONE see Marcus Peters and thinks Deion?
C'mon. This was a gratuitous shot pure and simple. Trying to justify it as if it has some relevancy is, well, silly.
Oh, I agree, which is why I said his reaction was childish and petty.
Deion is THE example of a great cover corner who provides 0 help in run support. If I were going to name 1 off the top of my head, it would be Deion and it should be Deion.