JohnnyHopkins
This is a house of learned doctors
- Messages
- 11,302
- Reaction score
- 3,610
Per Charles Robinson from Yahoo.....
The debate which has been blazing is Murray and his yards and injuries, and Heaven knows what else, so some can attempt to reason why you would send the best runningback away since Emmitt .
The answer is Suh. If you have to pony up the money to get Suh, then Murray may be completely out of the question.
So then the discussion will turn and address which brings the most to this team? Some say Murray will not repeat the 1800+, and I agree. But Murray also has the capability to hang up 1500 .
Suh brings strength to the middle of the line. But he also brings an attitude. Some good and some not so good. I see him as a more talented Albert Haynesworth.
The defense can improve without Suh with the right moves in the draft and perhaps a mid level FA.
But of all the answers I see on the replacement for Murray, I see nothing but an old guy, a hurt guy, a rookie that brings an unknown. And in all that, how does it affect a team that scored 29 points per game?
If this tweet was accurate, I am pleased. But you knew that going in, right?
More talented Albert haynesworth? Suh has one of best work ethics in the NFL. First one in, last one out type of guy. The only problem is he can't control his emotions..
right now Robinson is smiling on his couch at home and saying to his significant other "I told you mentioning the Cowboys would get me some attention..."
Suh is the most overrated defensive lineman since Haynesworth. Don't believe the ESPN hype machine.
Suh is the most overrated defensive lineman since Haynesworth. Don't believe the ESPN hype machine.
Did I miss something? Are we all sure this was just trolling sarcasm? Charles Robinson is a reputable (if that means anything) yahoo sports writer.
The debate which has been blazing is Murray and his yards and injuries, and Heaven knows what else, so some can attempt to reason why you would send the best runningback away since Emmitt .
The answer is Suh. If you have to pony up the money to get Suh, then Murray may be completely out of the question.
So then the discussion will turn and address which brings the most to this team? Some say Murray will not repeat the 1800+, and I agree. But Murray also has the capability to hang up 1500 .
Suh brings strength to the middle of the line. But he also brings an attitude. Some good and some not so good. I see him as a more talented Albert Haynesworth.
The defense can improve without Suh with the right moves in the draft and perhaps a mid level FA.
But of all the answers I see on the replacement for Murray, I see nothing but an old guy, a hurt guy, a rookie that brings an unknown. And in all that, how does it affect a team that scored 29 points per game?
If this tweet was accurate, I am pleased. But you knew that going in, right?
This may be true. Its being reported on KFFL that he's close on re-signing according to several sources.