DeMarcus Ware's Inclusion on 2000s' Decade Team Marks Another AP Gaffe

SDogo

Not as good as I once was but as good once as I ev
Messages
13,900
Reaction score
6
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...sion-on-00s-decade-team-marks-another-ap-gaff

by
Matt Shervington



Let me preface this by stating that I am a huge DeMarcus Ware fan.

I loved him coming out of Troy.

I loved him in the early days when Mike Zimmer was conservative and didn’t let him blitz.

I loved him when, as a result of that lack of blitzing, people erroneously thought Shawne Merriman was better than him.

I loved him most when I found out about his personal life involving his attempt at fatherhood.

Finally, I love him as a person because he embodies what is right about football.

With all that “love” how can I be writing this article?

Well it’s quite simple actually. DeMarcus Ware’s inclusion on the NFL All-Decade Team representing the 2000s is a ridiculous selection and represents something that we have unfortunately become way too familiar with this decade.

Members of the Associated Press are given the foremost power to determine how “good” a player is every year by nominating them to the All-Pro team for that given year. Rarely does the team truly include players that are the best at their position for that given season but in reality merely includes the players with the most media hype that given season.

Over the past three years alone, there have been plenty of gaffes by these so-called “experts” in selecting who should be placed on the All-Pro team and who should receive an Associated Press award. Examples that immediately come to mind are Ryan Clady, Jared Allen, Adrian Wilson, Ray Lewis, and Elvis Dumervil making the team this year or Bob Sanders winning the Defensive Player of the Year Award in 2007.

Despite the constant gaffes by the Associated Press, their word is continually taken as bond and receives little to no backlash in comparison to the other merited team at the end of the year...the Pro Bowl.

The Pro Bowl is constantly insulted because the “wrong” players got in, yet there is never backlash for the wrong players getting All-Pro nods. Surely these people are aware of the fact that All-Pro bids mean more right?

So when I saw DeMarcus Ware’s name on the All-Decade team I wasn’t shocked because the team was voted on by the same panel of know-nothing writers parading themselves as football fans. In reality, they are journalists first, fans second.

I am happy for Ware because he’s an excellent player, but he is most certainly not deserving of this decade’s team. Ware, more than likely, would have found himself on the next decade's team, given that he is only hitting his prime as a pass rusher. To include him on the team reeks of ignorance and bias from the elitist at the AP.

Assuming that this iteration of the All-Decade team follows suit of the ‘90s team, then there are six linebacker positions to be claimed. When compiling those six spots, the orientation of position doesn’t matter. The end objective is just to choose the six best linebackers, regardless of formation or position of the decade.

Surely not even the most biased Dallas Cowboys fan would tell you that DeMarcus Ware was one of the six best linebackers in the NFL. Hell, let’s assume that they choose three inside linebackers and three outside linebackers to make the cut. Surely Ware still doesn’t make the cut, right?

Sure, DeMarcus Ware’s 354 career tackles, 30.5 stuffs, 64.5 sacks, and 23 forced fumbles are impressive, but where’s the beef? The only aspect that stands out are his sack and stuff totals. I guess that one could argue he has an impressive tackle total given he plays in the 3-4 alignment.

However, I have to ask, how do Ware’s numbers compare to somebody who actually played the 3-4 outside linebacker position all decade in Joey Porter? Porter’s numbers are superior across the board with 30 more sacks, 11.5 more stuffs, one more forced fumble, eight more recoveries, 31 more passes defensed, and 11 more interceptions.

Not to mention Porter was a focal point on the Steelers 2005 postseason run. Thus, we have eliminated one of the three outside linebacker spots.

In this statistics-favoring society the sack seems to be over glorified and as a result people overlook the deficiencies of 3-4 outside linebackers as long as they rack up the sacks. Case in point when arguing this? DeMarcus Ware and Elvis Dumervil are the 2009 First-Team All-Pros despite rarely playing coverage and not playing the run that greatly. Just another gaffe by the AP. Forgotten in the sack hype are the 4-3 outside linebackers that are way more versatile.

There are at least four candidates that immediately spring to mind as superior to Ware over the course of the entire decade that played in the 4-3 defense.

Candidate No. 1 is Derrick Brooks of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Brooks amassed 1,035 tackles, 61 passes defensed, nine sacks, 39 stuffs, 16 forced fumbles, 17 interceptions, and scored six touchdowns. He also led one of the best defenses of all time in the 2002 Buccaneers on his way to a Defensive Player of The Year Award and a Super Bowl title.

Candidate No. 2 is Keith Bulluck who was a force bringing in 1,057 tackles, 68 passes defensed, 18 sacks, 48.5 stuffs, 15 forced fumbles, 19 interceptions, and a touchdown this decade. When the Titans began to have turnover around the 2005 season, Bulluck was pretty much the lone holdout and played the entire decade with the team. He was the unquestioned leader for 10 years.

The third candidate is Julian Peterson, who was often injured, but when he played he was a difference maker. He amassed 719 tackles, 56 passes defensed, 50.5 sacks, 34.5 stuffs, 21 forced fumbles, and eight interceptions during the decade with the 49ers, Seahawks, and Lions. He was one of the best coverage linebackers in the league for quite some time.

Finally, there is Lance Briggs, who brought in 775 tackles, 53 passes defensed, 8.5 sacks, 50 stuffs, 10 forced fumbles, 10 interceptions, and three touchdowns in only seven seasons. Briggs was an integral part of the Bears' defense and was the team’s best defender in the Super Bowl.

He was widely regarded by metrics sites as the league’s best coverage linebacker from 2004 to 2006. Briggs’ presence helped make the shoo-in for the team in Urlacher look as good as he did.

So how can anyone tell me that DeMarcus Ware logically deserves a spot on this team over those five guys who immediately came to mind? In addition to them are 3-4 guys like Adalius Thomas, Terrell Suggs, or Mike Vrabel, who were all well rounded and have better numbers over this decade .

The inclusion of DeMarcus Ware on the All-Decade team is just another mistake in a long line of them since the Associated Press commandeered an overwhelming majority in the say of Hall of Fame selection, All-Pro selection, and word of mouth.

Clearly the decision process was obviously rushed as the decision as to who makes the team was done and will be finalized before the final game of the decade—Super Bowl XLIV—is even played.

I think that it is time to get rid of the “experts” and let the guys who actually played the sport make selections.
 

RCowboyFan

Active Member
Messages
6,926
Reaction score
2
This dude is a trip. Does he realize Ware is only one of the six players in NFL history since sacks have been counted to have 20 sacks? He is making a case for Lance Briggs? Give me a break.

Don't know if Ware is desserving or not, or AP makes mistakes or not ( they do a lot), but his arguments are really weak. Only case that I woudl make against ware that he has made is he hasn't played enough in 2000s.
 

Hoofbite

Well-Known Member
Messages
40,865
Reaction score
11,566
RCowboyFan;3259521 said:
This dude is a trip. Does he realize Ware is only one of the six players in NFL history since sacks have been counted to have 20 sacks? He is making a case for Lance Briggs? Give me a break.

Don't know if Ware is desserving or not, or AP makes mistakes or not ( they do a lot), but his arguments are really weak. Only case that I woudl make against ware that he has made is he hasn't played enough in 2000s.

1 amazing season shouldn't get someone onto an "All-Decade" team. If it did, Chris Johnson would be on there.

I absolutely love Ware but I just don't think he's played enough of the decade to make that team. I think longevity is just as important as production. If you have a guy who has produced for 8+ years but maybe not as much as a guy who has played for 5, I think the 8+ guy should get the nod.
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
Hoofbite;3259532 said:
1 amazing season shouldn't get someone onto an "All-Decade" team. If it did, Chris Johnson would be on there.

I absolutely love Ware but I just don't think he's played enough of the decade to make that team. I think longevity is just as important as production. If you have a guy who has produced for 8+ years but maybe not as much as a guy who has played for 5, I think the 8+ guy should get the nod.

I agree with you but I'd still put Ware on the team. He is clearly one of the six best in talent.
 

BAT

Mr. Fixit
Messages
19,443
Reaction score
15,607
Hoofbite;3259532 said:
1 amazing season shouldn't get someone onto an "All-Decade" team. If it did, Chris Johnson would be on there.

I absolutely love Ware but I just don't think he's played enough of the decade to make that team. I think longevity is just as important as production. If you have a guy who has produced for 8+ years but maybe not as much as a guy who has played for 5, I think the 8+ guy should get the nod.

Specious argument. Just because he did not play the entire decade does not automatically eliminate him from all decade honors. Go back and look at the all decade teams, you will find a plethora of players who played in as many years of that particular decade as Ware.

Players are voted onto this team for dominance, pure and simple. There should not be any Art Monks (longevity driven stats) on this team. Be the best at your position year in and year out and you are on the team. How many times was Porter the clear best at his position? Thomas? Suggs? Vrabel??? Rubbish.
 

Cowboy Brian

@BrianLINY
Messages
15,864
Reaction score
5,053
Ware is the #1 O-linebacker in the NFL right now- infact, he is the #1-o-linebacker of the decade.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
Hoofbite;3259532 said:
1 amazing season shouldn't get someone onto an "All-Decade" team. If it did, Chris Johnson would be on there.

I absolutely love Ware but I just don't think he's played enough of the decade to make that team. I think longevity is just as important as production. If you have a guy who has produced for 8+ years but maybe not as much as a guy who has played for 5, I think the 8+ guy should get the nod.
Why? He's obviously not the better player during that decade. I don't see the reason for rewarding someone for coming into the league in 2000 instead of 2005.
 

dadymat

I'm kind of a Big Deal
Messages
6,023
Reaction score
1
his bio explains alot



ABOUT MATT »

Favorite Athletes
Brian Dawkins, Troy Polamalu, Brian Westbrook, Carson Palmer, Cole Hamels, Ryan Howard, Jimmy Rollins, Alex Ovechkin, Ivgani Malkin, Michael Phelps, Ben Roethlisberger

Favorite Sports Teams
Pittsburgh Steelers, Philadelphia Phillies

Favorite Coaches
Mike Tomlin, Chuck Noll, Bill Cowher
 

Cowboy Brian

@BrianLINY
Messages
15,864
Reaction score
5,053
dadymat;3259567 said:
his bio explains alot



ABOUT MATT »

Favorite Athletes
Brian Dawkins, Troy Polamalu, Brian Westbrook, Carson Palmer, Cole Hamels, Ryan Howard, Jimmy Rollins, Alex Ovechkin, Ivgani Malkin, Michael Phelps, Ben Roethlisberger

Favorite Sports Teams
Pittsburgh Steelers, Philadelphia Phillies

Favorite Coaches
Mike Tomlin, Chuck Noll, Bill Cowher

:bang2: how do these people get passed mental exams. **** Philly and pittsburg.
 

Future

Intramural Legend
Messages
27,566
Reaction score
14,714
So how can anyone tell me that DeMarcus Ware logically deserves a spot on this team over those five guys who immediately came to mind? In addition to them are 3-4 guys like Adalius Thomas, Terrell Suggs, or Mike Vrabel, who were all well rounded and have better numbers over this decade .
Real simple...He's better than all of them.
 

Hoofbite

Well-Known Member
Messages
40,865
Reaction score
11,566
theogt;3259565 said:
Why? He's obviously not the better player during that decade. I don't see the reason for rewarding someone for coming into the league in 2000 instead of 2005.

I already said why. I think All-Decade should be reserved for players who have played the majority of the decade. Where do you draw the line?
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
Someone please tell this guy (he's just a fan, by the way) that the All-Decade Team is NOT picked by the AP.

It's chosen by the Pro Football Hall of Fame committee.
 

dcfanatic

Benched
Messages
10,408
Reaction score
1
AdamJT13;3259636 said:
Someone please tell this guy (he's just a fan, by the way) that the All-Decade Team is NOT picked by the AP.

It's chosen by the Pro Football Hall of Fame committee.

Was just going to post this.

How does his guy write this and not check that out first?
 
Messages
661
Reaction score
0
what the ****. this is why i rarely come here during the post season and i get crucified for saying jokingly mike martz should be brought in instead of JG
 

adbutcher

K9NME
Messages
12,287
Reaction score
2,910
dcfanatic;3259655 said:
Was just going to post this.

How does his guy write this and not check that out first?

I am glad that I read up to this point because it saves me from posting what has already been said. What's funny is some of our wise forum members siding with this idiot, lol.
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
Hoofbite;3259532 said:
1 amazing season shouldn't get someone onto an "All-Decade" team. If it did, Chris Johnson would be on there.

I absolutely love Ware but I just don't think he's played enough of the decade to make that team. I think longevity is just as important as production. If you have a guy who has produced for 8+ years but maybe not as much as a guy who has played for 5, I think the 8+ guy should get the nod.

Ware's better than those players, period.

He should have won DPOY twice already.

There's a difference between a player that "produced" for 8 years and a guy who's "dominated" for 5 years.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
Now we have to worry about what year a player was born to honor him.

Unreal. The idiocy never stops.
 

TheCount

Pixel Pusher
Messages
25,523
Reaction score
8,849
This is such a ridiculous article. Not because he point may or may not be valid (it's not) but because he literally has no argument other than "Demarcus Ware hasnt played football in the NFL for 10 years".

EDIT: I see Hos kind of beat me to it.
 

Hoofbite

Well-Known Member
Messages
40,865
Reaction score
11,566
TheCount;3259727 said:
This is such a ridiculous article. Not because he point may or may not be valid (it's not) but because he literally has no argument other than "Demarcus Ware hasnt played football in the NFL for 10 years".

EDIT: I see Hos kind of beat me to it.

I think the author's main argument is just that there are players who have better numbers. I think there's some hint of not playing enough but he seems to be stuck on overall production regardless of time spent playing.

I think longevity is just as important because playing at a high level for a decade is an accomplishment in itself. Guess I'm an idiot for having that opinion.
 
Top