News: Depth At Cornerback Will Make Nickel Dallas Cowboys’ Base Defense In 2015

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,005
Reaction score
22,603
Depth At Cornerback Will Make Nickel Dallas Cowboys’ Base Defense In 2015
By Cameron DaSilva

http://www.rantsports.com/nfl/2015/...e-nickel-dallas-cowboys-base-defense-in-2015/





When you think of the Dallas Cowboys‘ base defense, you automatically go to the 4-3. That’s true, but when you look at the numbers from 2014, the Cowboys were actually in a nickel formation more often than they were in the base 4-3. What this means is that Dallas had three cornerbacks on the field more than it had three linebackers lined up.

With that said, I expect the same to be true in 2015. The Cowboys have great depth at cornerback, so long as everyone (mainly Morris Claiborne) stays healthy. Orlando Scandrick, Brandon Carr and Byron Jones are expected to be the starters, which gives Dallas a strong secondary against the pass. The starting linebackers will be Rolando McClain and Sean Lee, both of whom are great in coverage.

Rather than keep one of the three corners on the sideline and having a run-stopping linebacker like Anthony Hitchens on the field, the Cowboys will use their secondary depth as often as possible. That’s not to say Dallas’ backup linebackers aren’t talented, because they are. The Cowboys have signed seemingly every linebacker on the market this offseason and have starter-potential players at all three spots.

The NFL is a passing league, and it’s hard to win without a strong secondary. When healthy, the Cowboys’ defensive backs have the potential to be great. Jones can flex back to safety with J.J. Wilcox coming down as a strong safety and Barry Church playing as a big nickel linebacker, putting the best defensive backs on the field as often as possible.

Matching up against high-powered passing offenses such as the New York Giants, Philadelphia Eagles and the Green Bay Packers will be easier with three corners on the field rather than three linebackers. It’s also a plus that all three starting corners are able and willing to come downhill and hit ball carriers.

The nickel defense will be key to Dallas’ success, and it all starts with depth at the cornerback position.
 

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,960
Reaction score
26,604
Depth At Cornerback Will Make Nickel Dallas Cowboys’ Base Defense In 2015
By Cameron DaSilva

http://www.rantsports.com/nfl/2015/...e-nickel-dallas-cowboys-base-defense-in-2015/





When you think of the Dallas Cowboys‘ base defense, you automatically go to the 4-3. That’s true, but when you look at the numbers from 2014, the Cowboys were actually in a nickel formation more often than they were in the base 4-3. What this means is that Dallas had three cornerbacks on the field more than it had three linebackers lined up.

With that said, I expect the same to be true in 2015. The Cowboys have great depth at cornerback, so long as everyone (mainly Morris Claiborne) stays healthy. Orlando Scandrick, Brandon Carr and Byron Jones are expected to be the starters, which gives Dallas a strong secondary against the pass. The starting linebackers will be Rolando McClain and Sean Lee, both of whom are great in coverage.

Rather than keep one of the three corners on the sideline and having a run-stopping linebacker like Anthony Hitchens on the field, the Cowboys will use their secondary depth as often as possible. That’s not to say Dallas’ backup linebackers aren’t talented, because they are. The Cowboys have signed seemingly every linebacker on the market this offseason and have starter-potential players at all three spots.

The NFL is a passing league, and it’s hard to win without a strong secondary. When healthy, the Cowboys’ defensive backs have the potential to be great. Jones can flex back to safety with J.J. Wilcox coming down as a strong safety and Barry Church playing as a big nickel linebacker, putting the best defensive backs on the field as often as possible.

Matching up against high-powered passing offenses such as the New York Giants, Philadelphia Eagles and the Green Bay Packers will be easier with three corners on the field rather than three linebackers. It’s also a plus that all three starting corners are able and willing to come downhill and hit ball carriers.

The nickel defense will be key to Dallas’ success, and it all starts with depth at the cornerback position.

I bet most teams played more NICKLE since most offenses run so many 3 WR sets
If you can
Play NICKLE and still stop the run its a huge advantage in today's nfl to play nickle
 

Outlaw Heroes

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,401
Reaction score
6,609
Not sure Mr. Da Silva spent much time thinking this piece through. He has Lee and McClain penciled in as the nickel backers but later suggests that Church will move from SS to playing as a "big nickel linebacker". What? So are we back to 3 linebackers then?

In any event, I think Hitchens has a good shot at being the other nickel linebacker. Notwithstanding Da Silva's suggestion to the contrary, he may be better than Ro in coverage.
 

ScipioCowboy

More than meets the eye.
Messages
25,266
Reaction score
17,597
Not sure Mr. Da Silva spent much time thinking this piece through. He has Lee and McClain penciled in as the nickel backers but later suggests that Church will move from SS to playing as a "big nickel linebacker". What? So are we back to 3 linebackers then?

In any event, I think Hitchens has a good shot at being the other nickel linebacker. Notwithstanding Da Silva's suggestion to the contrary, he may be better than Ro in coverage.

Doesn't a "big nickel" field three safeties rather than three corners?

If I'm remembering correctly, during the late 90s, the Packers ran a big nickel with LeRoy Butler playing close to the line of scrimmage.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,833
Reaction score
103,557
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Given the areas where this team did concentrate on improvements (pass rush, secondary) and where they didn't (defensive tackle), I'm expecting opposing offenses to do all that they can to try to attack the Cowboys with their run game.
 

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,705
Reaction score
60,327
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Somebody explain football to this nitwit.

Dallas is not running the nickel as a base package. They'll run it against 3-receiver sets just like everybody else.

And in today's NFL, that's most of the time, yes. But that doesn't mean it is the base defense.
 

DallasDW00ds0n

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,179
Reaction score
11,634
This article is pretty bad. And Ro McClain is more a run stopper than cover lb
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,193
Reaction score
64,699
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I bet most teams played more NICKLE since most offenses run so many 3 WR sets
If you can
Play NICKLE and still stop the run its a huge advantage in today's nfl to play nickle

Yes, they play Nickel against 3 WR sets. It's not really a choice by the defense on how often they face 3 WRs.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,193
Reaction score
64,699
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Doesn't a "big nickel" field three safeties rather than three corners?

If I'm remembering correctly, during the late 90s, the Packers ran a big nickel with LeRoy Butler playing close to the line of scrimmage.

No, in the Nickel, a LB is replaced by a CB. In the big Nickel, that LB is replaced by a Safety.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,193
Reaction score
64,699
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Depth At Cornerback Will Make Nickel Dallas Cowboys’ Base Defense In 2015
By Cameron DaSilva

http://www.rantsports.com/nfl/2015/...e-nickel-dallas-cowboys-base-defense-in-2015/





When you think of the Dallas Cowboys‘ base defense, you automatically go to the 4-3. That’s true, but when you look at the numbers from 2014, the Cowboys were actually in a nickel formation more often than they were in the base 4-3. What this means is that Dallas had three cornerbacks on the field more than it had three linebackers lined up.

With that said, I expect the same to be true in 2015. The Cowboys have great depth at cornerback, so long as everyone (mainly Morris Claiborne) stays healthy. Orlando Scandrick, Brandon Carr and Byron Jones are expected to be the starters, which gives Dallas a strong secondary against the pass. The starting linebackers will be Rolando McClain and Sean Lee, both of whom are great in coverage.

Rather than keep one of the three corners on the sideline and having a run-stopping linebacker like Anthony Hitchens on the field, the Cowboys will use their secondary depth as often as possible. That’s not to say Dallas’ backup linebackers aren’t talented, because they are. The Cowboys have signed seemingly every linebacker on the market this offseason and have starter-potential players at all three spots.

The NFL is a passing league, and it’s hard to win without a strong secondary. When healthy, the Cowboys’ defensive backs have the potential to be great. Jones can flex back to safety with J.J. Wilcox coming down as a strong safety and Barry Church playing as a big nickel linebacker, putting the best defensive backs on the field as often as possible.

Matching up against high-powered passing offenses such as the New York Giants, Philadelphia Eagles and the Green Bay Packers will be easier with three corners on the field rather than three linebackers. It’s also a plus that all three starting corners are able and willing to come downhill and hit ball carriers.

The nickel defense will be key to Dallas’ success, and it all starts with depth at the cornerback position.

The difference in having more CBs will not be more Nickel in place of base. It will be more Dime in place of Nickel. They have already been practicing a lot of Dime in the OTAs. They rarely used the Dime defense last season.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,193
Reaction score
64,699
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Not sure Mr. Da Silva spent much time thinking this piece through. He has Lee and McClain penciled in as the nickel backers but later suggests that Church will move from SS to playing as a "big nickel linebacker". What? So are we back to 3 linebackers then?

In any event, I think Hitchens has a good shot at being the other nickel linebacker. Notwithstanding Da Silva's suggestion to the contrary, he may be better than Ro in coverage.

Church replacing a LB would be considered a Big Nickel.

I think Hitchens will play some or possibly all of the Nickel snaps in place of RoMc.
 

JBell

That's still my Quarterback
Messages
5,699
Reaction score
6,840
Somebody explain football to this nitwit.

Dallas is not running the nickel as a base package. They'll run it against 3-receiver sets just like everybody else.

And in today's NFL, that's most of the time, yes. But that doesn't mean it is the base defense.
Depends on your definition of base defense.

If base defense = what you run the majority of the game, then the author is on point because we're in nickel more than any other defensive formation.
 

AsthmaField

Outta bounds
Messages
26,489
Reaction score
44,544
How is that different from what I said?

It isn't.

He was just thinking in terms of going from the base 43 to the big nickle (LB out and S in)

You were taking the angle of going from a reg nickle to a big nickle (CB out and S in).

Same thing, just approached differently.
 

reddyuta

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,511
Reaction score
17,234
Given the areas where this team did concentrate on improvements (pass rush, secondary) and where they didn't (defensive tackle), I'm expecting opposing offenses to do all that they can to try to attack the Cowboys with their run game.

That's the trade off i will gladly take and welcome it.
 

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,960
Reaction score
26,604
Depends on your definition of base defense.

If base defense = what you run the majority of the game, then the author is on point because we're in nickel more than any other defensive formation.

I guess it's all in how you look at it
Our base is a 4/3 but you have to adjust to what the other team does
If they play more 3 wide then you have to matchup
 

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,705
Reaction score
60,327
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Depends on your definition of base defense.

If base defense = what you run the majority of the game, then the author is on point because we're in nickel more than any other defensive formation.

Then the entire NFL is in the nickel as their base defense.
 
Top