StarBoyz83
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 17,434
- Reaction score
- 11,978
Actually according to NFL personnel who interviewed him they say the exact opposite
That's good for the Browns then. Seen people say otherwise.
Actually according to NFL personnel who interviewed him they say the exact opposite
The wet ball throws were weird....but remember Aikman had troubles with wet balls too. Everything else was really good. No chance he is there at 4. Goff should be...or Ramsey.
Actually according to NFL personnel who interviewed him they say the exact opposite
Ramsey or bosa is our pick unless tunsil is there
Based on many of the pro-Wentz comments above, it sounds like some nobody from NDSU is the all-time greatest QB ever. It's hilarious.
Chiefs picked OT Fisher with the number one pick and almost everyone thought he was going to be some stellar OL. He turned out to be nothing but a backup at best.
Based on many of the pro-Wentz comments above, it sounds like some nobody from NDSU is the all-time greatest QB ever. It's hilarious.
Chiefs picked OT Fisher with the number one pick and almost everyone thought he was going to be some stellar OL. He turned out to be nothing but a backup at best.
Yes. Including the blind man in attendance.
You guys are nuts. Wentz is a good prospect, but not a big time QB. He's a lower level QB who has never proven himself against top competition. Not giving up 2 first round picks for that risk
Almost no chance Tunsil will be there unless Tennessee trades down. I really won't be mad if we got either QB, Elliott, Ramsey or Bosa.
What does that have to do with Wentz?
Tony romo played against lower level comp
...
Even Romo said he wasn't ready for the NFL for about three years. Had Romo been thrown into the fire his rookie season, he would have failed miserably.
Same with Wentz. He just isn't ready and won't be for three years in my opinion. Draft Wentz and he most likely won't even be active his first year. Even if Romo were to get injured, Wentz will do nothing THIS year. Nothing. Zero. Zip. Nada.
Even Romo said he wasn't ready for the NFL for about three years. Had Romo been thrown into the fire his rookie season, he would have failed miserably.
Same with Wentz. He just isn't ready and won't be for three years in my opinion. Draft Wentz and he most likely won't even be active his first year. Even if Romo were to get injured, Wentz will do nothing THIS year. Nothing. Zero. Zip. Nada.
I agree and I could care less. Taking Wentz to me is not about this year but the future. I actually believe in the concept that you fix a problem before it becomes a bigger problem. At some point in the very near future we have to replace tony, why wait? The cost will only be higher in the form of picks because I don't believe we will be picking 4 that often
That first throw in that video after they wet the ball looked positively Hackenbergish.
To this point, is Wentz really worth the #4 pick? He may be ahead of others at this point (not by much in some cases), but don't you feel that gap can be closed with 2yrs on the bench?
I'm having a hard time why so many have him rated as high as he is. Yes, he has size and a nice set of physical tools and seems to have leadership qualities that can be projected into the next level. But that can be said about guys that are being discussed for day 2.
Ramsey or bosa is our pick unless tunsil is there