AbeBeta;2248460 said:Anyone know?
I don't really care about Jefferson per se. But I can't stand loose ends.
jobberone;2248463 said:Right now I'd prefer having someone to call upon who the coaches know and knowes the offense.
AbeBeta;2248485 said:Like Jefferson?
I really wonder if that's the case... It's certainly not definitive.jobberone;2248503 said:Sorry didn't make myself clear. Yes. Jefferson is ahead of Amendola.
peplaw06;2248620 said:I really wonder if that's the case... It's certainly not definitive.
1) Jefferson didn't see a snap at WR in the first game.
2) I think we knew we would be signing Bollinger before Jefferson was called up.
3) That means we knew we would have to cut someone.
I think that an argument could be made that we brought up Jefferson in case we had someone out of TO, Crayton and Stanback get hurt, but with the intent that we would be cutting that guy again after the game if everything turned out okay.
I don't think they necessarily brought up the best guy, since Jefferson didn't see a snap, at least not one I remember seeing. Maybe they think Amendola is ahead of Jefferson but didn't want to risk exposing him to waivers again, unlike Jefferson.
I certainly don't think it's open and shut that Jefferson is ahead of Amendola. It's arguable IMO.
peplaw06;2248620 said:I really wonder if that's the case... It's certainly not definitive.
1) Jefferson didn't see a snap at WR in the first game.
2) I think we knew we would be signing Bollinger before Jefferson was called up.
3) That means we knew we would have to cut someone.
I think that an argument could be made that we brought up Jefferson in case we had someone out of TO, Crayton and Stanback get hurt, but with the intent that we would be cutting that guy again after the game if everything turned out okay.
I don't think they necessarily brought up the best guy, since Jefferson didn't see a snap, at least not one I remember seeing. Maybe they think Amendola is ahead of Jefferson but didn't want to risk exposing him to waivers again, unlike Jefferson.
I certainly don't think it's open and shut that Jefferson is ahead of Amendola. It's arguable IMO.
It's an indication. But I certainly don't think it's definitive.Shotgun Dave;2248631 said:I think the fact that Jefferson was made active whereas Amendola was not is an indication that Jefferson is, in fact, considered "ahead" of Amendola.
Does counsel not concur?
Good point. He's still unprotected as a PS guy. Forgot that.jobberone;2248635 said:I'd agree it's very arguable. I'm basing it on watching them and the fact they used Jefferson and not Amendola to backup the WRs. But they could be afraid to expose Amendola again however either way you look at it someone has to put him on their 53 to pull him off our PS. So any of the other 31 teams can grab him at anytime as long as he agrees with a contract. So I'm not certain how subjecting him to waivers makes it any worse.
peplaw06;2248639 said:Good point. He's still unprotected as a PS guy. Forgot that.
Nevermind
Bob Sacamano;2248683 said:criminals - 1
lawyers - 0
j/k jobber
peplaw06;2248779 said:hangers on - still useless