Did Jefferson Clear?

peplaw06

That Guy
Messages
13,699
Reaction score
413
Bob Sacamano;2248807 said:
ah, the old martyr/paranoid syndrome

seems it's always the worst posters who are afflicted w/ it
Then explain to me why the only times you ever address me are when you "catch me" saying something wrong?

Do you have this "syndrome?" Cause you're easily on the list of worst posters. 31,000+ posts and counting, and I can't recall a single one from you that was substantive.

Bob Sacamano;2248821 said:
no, just saying that peplaw is a bad lawyer

I've seen him argue, it's not pretty
Clearly it was over your head.

I've pwned you in so many arguments it ain't funny. You're like the Commanders and I'm the Cowboys. I ***** slap you around thread after thread, then you go away... until you find some post where you think you've caught me, then like clockwork, you pop in to say, "yeah, what now??"

Ironic that you should call jobber a criminal.... How's that criminal record treating you?

Guess I should just put you back on ignore.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
peplaw06;2248843 said:
Then explain to me why the only times you ever address me are when you "catch me" saying something wrong?

Do you have this "syndrome?" Cause you're easily on the list of worst posters. 31,000+ posts and counting, and I can't recall a single one from you that was substantive.



Clearly it was over your head.

I've pwned you in so many arguments it ain't funny. You're like the Commanders and I'm the Cowboys. I ***** slap you around thread after thread, then you go away... until you find some post where you think you've caught me, then like clockwork, you pop in to say, "yeah, what now??"

Ironic that you should call jobber a criminal.... How's that criminal record treating you?

Guess I should just put you back on ignore.

1st of all, I didn't call jobber a criminal, I think I made that pretty clear when I said JUST KIDDING JOBBER

and 2nd of all, you haven't pwned ****, you once compared Roger Goodell to Mike Nifong, but I do enjoy seeing you get all emotional like a chick, threatening to put me on ignore

you can't even read a contract, I remember you stumbling over the CBA
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,704
Reaction score
12,422
I knew my Jefferson to the PS thread was going to be controversial.

Please don't put each other on ignore, watching you two slap fight is one of my only pleasures.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
AbeBeta;2248865 said:
I knew my Jefferson to the PS thread was going to be controversial.

Please don't put each other on ignore, watching you two slap fight is one of my only pleasures.

don't worry, you'll get yours
 

peplaw06

That Guy
Messages
13,699
Reaction score
413
Bob Sacamano;2248858 said:
1st of all, I didn't call jobber a criminal, I think I made that pretty clear when I said JUST KIDDING JOBBER
Saying "just kidding" doesn't mean you didn't say it.

and 2nd of all, you haven't pwned ****, you once compared Roger Goodell to Mike Nifong, but I do enjoy seeing you get all emotional like a chick, threatening to put me on ignore
The comparison was made, and it was appropriate. Look at all the people who question Goodell now. I was just one in a group of trendsetters. Now it's common. You Goodell though, so sorry if you get all butt hurt over it.

I'm sure the ladies on here would love your chick comment too. Again, you can't say anything substantive, so you resort to name calling. And yet here you are one more time, trying to call me out for something that you weren't even involved in. Who's being the "chick?"

you can't even read a contract, I remember you stumbling over the CBA
You just couldn't comprehend what the argument was from either side. Not surprised.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
peplaw06;2248879 said:
Saying "just kidding" doesn't mean you didn't say it.

but the intent behind my comment was purely in jest, that's the key point

jobber, the one who should care, didn't take it other than for what it was

I know being a lawyer you're used to taking up cases, but damn dude

peplaw06 said:
The comparison was made, and it was appropriate. Look at all the people who question Goodell now. I was just one in a group of trendsetters. Now it's common. You slurp Goodell though, so sorry if you get all butt hurt over it.

how is comparing Goodell, who is doing his duty, under the letter of the law, to someone who essentially broke the law by pursuing a prosecution w/ no credible evidence, appropriate?

notice Goodell was never reprimanded by anyone for his actions, while Nifong was?

so the comparison was stupid then, and is just as stupid now, that is the extent of your logic, and people are supposed to believe that you pwn anyone...

peplaw06 said:
I'm sure the ladies on here would love your chick comment too. Again, you can't say anything substantive, so you resort to name calling. And yet here you are one more time, trying to call me out for something that you weren't even involved in. Who's being the "chick?"

now you're putting yourself in a woman's state of mind? boy you really are feminine

peplaw06 said:
You just couldn't comprehend what the argument was from either side. Not surprised.

LOL

the argument was that Goodell could suspend Adam Jones w/o him being convicted of any crime, well, the correct one, you of course, chose the opposite side, and then the NEW CBA was brought up....
 

FLcowboy

When Jerry, when?
Messages
4,061
Reaction score
260
peplaw06;2248620 said:
I really wonder if that's the case... It's certainly not definitive.

1) Jefferson didn't see a snap at WR in the first game.

2) I think we knew we would be signing Bollinger before Jefferson was called up.

3) That means we knew we would have to cut someone.

I think that an argument could be made that we brought up Jefferson in case we had someone out of TO, Crayton and Stanback get hurt, but with the intent that we would be cutting that guy again after the game if everything turned out okay.

I don't think they necessarily brought up the best guy, since Jefferson didn't see a snap, at least not one I remember seeing. Maybe they think Amendola is ahead of Jefferson but didn't want to risk exposing him to waivers again, unlike Jefferson.

I certainly don't think it's open and shut that Jefferson is ahead of Amendola. It's arguable IMO.

Was he even active? I have to admit I didn't get to pay much attention to any thing because the pregame was preempted here in Florida, and I was watching that game becaue I had no choice. The rest of the games were over.
 

Nors

Benched
Messages
22,015
Reaction score
1
A few years back I'd be in a fray like this.

Now - people fear me when I take a stand like on Amendola.

Get a room and turn out the lights boys.
 
Top