khiladi
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 35,894
- Reaction score
- 35,105
Let’s continue to beat this bush from the perspective of an option route.
Here is the clip from Dan Orlovaky breaking it down and pay attention to the last sentence in particular. If one doesn’t want to watch the breakdown, just forward to 2:05 and then 2:30. So from here, would we argue that Dan said Lamb and NOT Dak was confused? If not Dak, who exactly is being referred to here in the statement at 2:23:
“totally confused HIM (Lamb) and the QUARTERBACK (?)”
Is he referring to Aaron Rodgers?
Or is Dan actually saying the defense baited the offense to throw the pick based upon the SAFETY look of cover 3, whole positioning themselves close to the middle and this is what RC referring to when he stated “lie, lie, lie” in regards to the Packers defense?
This brings us to the fundamental issue of where Dak zealots get the argument that Dak is being absolved?
Here is the clip from Dan Orlovaky breaking it down and pay attention to the last sentence in particular. If one doesn’t want to watch the breakdown, just forward to 2:05 and then 2:30. So from here, would we argue that Dan said Lamb and NOT Dak was confused? If not Dak, who exactly is being referred to here in the statement at 2:23:
“totally confused HIM (Lamb) and the QUARTERBACK (?)”
Is he referring to Aaron Rodgers?
Or is Dan actually saying the defense baited the offense to throw the pick based upon the SAFETY look of cover 3, whole positioning themselves close to the middle and this is what RC referring to when he stated “lie, lie, lie” in regards to the Packers defense?
This brings us to the fundamental issue of where Dak zealots get the argument that Dak is being absolved?
Last edited: