I really, really hate it when someone puts words in my mouth. I am quite capable of articulating my thoughts without using nuisance.
Let's start with one amazing thing you just wrote. You said, "Again, his individual stats do point to individual greatness. However, as the dastardly NFL measures things, the Super Bowl is the prize."
You observation just shows the bias toward the Cowboys, and Romo, like Danny White before him suffers from that bias. How else would an average WR like Chris Carter, with no SB win, be in the HOF and an All Decade of the 70's player, Drew Pearson, with a SB ring, not be? It Cowboy hatred, pure and simple.
Then there is this type of insanity:
Romo was criticized in this seasons Detroit game the Cowboys lost 31-30. Romo's defense allowed 24 points in the 4th quarter. Tony led the offense to 17 points in that 4th quarter. In a point of fact, Dallas had a 10 point lead with 11 minutes to go in the game, scored another 10 points and still lost. What we heard is how Tony missed some pass or held the ball too long. Mostly in the 1st or 2nd quarter. I guess you answer is they lost so Tony sucks? It also points our something I have been saying for years. Until the Cowboy's defense is fixed, they will never win another playoff game.
Think about the above. Romo's defense allowed 24 points in the 4th quarter. Now contrast that to this: Eli Manning and the Giants won a SB in 2011. They played 4 playoff/SB games in their run. The Giants defense allowed 2-20-17-17 points in those games. Now tell me again that stats don't tell a story?
How else would an average WR like Chris Carter, with no SB win, be in the HOF and an All Decade of the 70's player, Drew Pearson, with a SB ring, not be? It Cowboy hatred, pure and simple.
I think I get the point you were trying to make, however, calling Chris Carter an average WR doesn't compute for me.
He played a long time and had OK numbers but the point was he never played on a championship team and yet he gets in and Drew doesn't? That doesn't compute with me..
Mein gott! Don't get your hedgerow in a bustle!
My premise is this: Romo's stats point to an often great level of play. In the real world, individual stats fall way behind an actual playoff win or the Super Bowl. At least in my universe.
Of course, Romo's stats, sans playoff success, might mean ever thing to others.
Romo has had a couple of rough outings..but he is not alone..That is what matters. Yet we continue to focus on Tony and ignore everything else. It's like everyone has given up on the defense and expects Tony to put up games like Denver every week. The opposition has figured out this offense. Double Witten and Dez and pressure Romo. One would think, sooner or later, the OC would figure this out..
I agree with you, during that era you had Jerry Rice, Michael Irvin, Tim Brown, Shannon Sharpe, James Lofton, Art Monk.....just dont see Cris Carter in that group. Drew has made some of the most memorable plays in NFL history and is the definition of clutch....it's a shame he is not even considered.He played a long time and had OK numbers but the point was he never played on a championship team and yet he gets in and Drew doesn't? That doesn't compute with me..
Same opinion, good QB but has never proven to me he is a BIG game QB who could consistently get you into the playoffs and win you championships. I was hoping he could have made a statement last night and change my opinion because I so want him to shut up his critics, including me. But again it didn't happen and I don't know if it ever will, his window is staring to close and without any post season success his legacy will be just below Danny White..... IMO.
A lot of chatter about that last April after the draft. The feeling was a 2nd round QB wouldn't be a shocker.First time ever I thought about drafting a qb.
There is a lot in what you say Me I think it is a confluence of several factors: Romo's gunslingin style, poor game strategy, injuries, an O line that is a work in progress and yes, double coverage on Dez and even Witten.
Forgive me and my fellow forumites in being rough on Tony because the QB is the leader, the field general. If he does good he gets the glory and not the O line and receivers. If he does poorly he get the blame. All of it. Been like that for a long time. Sorry romo gets the brunt of criticism but he is the leader.
Cris Carter had outstanding numbers, not just OK numbers. Championships can't be considered when you put WR's in the Hall. If so, we can make a case for Alvin Harper. I DO agree with you that Drew Pearson had a HOF worthy career, but with less than 8,000 career receiving yards and less than 50 TD's, the stat guys won't factor in he played in a different era.
Forgive me and my fellow forumites in being rough on Tony because the QB is the leader, the field general. If he does good he gets the glory and not the O line and receivers. If he does poorly he get the blame. All of it. Been like that for a long time. Sorry romo gets the brunt of criticism but he is the leader.
A lot of chatter about that last April after the draft. The feeling was a 2nd round QB wouldn't be a shocker.
Romo has had a couple of rough outings..but he is not alone..That is what matters. Yet we continue to focus on Tony and ignore everything else.
Just curious.
To the Romo lovers, did it change your opinion of him as a top-tier QB?
To the Romo critics: Did it make you more convinced he's an up and down QB, i.e. inconsistent or even overrated when facing cupcakes?
To those inbetween: Did the game sway you one way or ther other?
As a sun shine pumper it has put me in a tail spin about the entire organization