Did the Cowboys make the right choice not signing Murray?

[Galian Beast]

Did the Cowboys make the right decision to not re-sign DeMarco Murray for 8 million a year?

Yes or No?

 

[Hardline]

Ill tell you next season

 

[RonSpringsdaman20]

maybe

 

[Kevinicus]

Absolutely.

 

[Arkyvarminter]

Absolutely not...

 

[robjay04]

Ill tell you next season

Murray could have a great season and we could look silly by not signing him. We will know more in 2-3 years when I believe the Eagles will be regretting that contract.

No disrespect to the OP, I just think this question is a little played out. I am stoked about the season and Murray is one of the last things on my mind.

 

[Setackin]

Yes

 

[Mr Cowboy]

Murray is gone, live with it.....

 

[Qbert]

for the money he got, to be a part time player no less, im glad we didnt bring him back

 

[perrykemp]

If it costs them a Superbowl, yes they made a mistake.

Otherwise, I am <OK> with the decision.

 

[Ken]

Yes. It *may* sting a little this season but he will certainly fall of enough the following year to prove it to be correct.

It really hinges on whether the Cowboys made the right decision with Randle and McFadden.

 

[Vinnie2u]

I'm over it...

 

[BrAinPaiNt]

It has been done, good or bad it can not be changed so it is not worth the time or energy arguing about it now.

 

[PhillyCowboysFan]

Bro just move on already.

 

[ShiningStar]

For the price tag yes, but as it was sold to me, get rid of murray easier to sign Dez and that can be debated if that helped. Yes, its ok hes gone, No dallas did not handle it as best they could. That is the bigger debate, not that Murray is gone.

 

[pupulehaole]

Yes for me.

 

[Cowboy4ever]

1000000 times yes.

 

[Sarge]

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

 

[jobberone]

I'm sorry. What was the question?

 

[ShiningStar]

I'm sorry. What was the question?

did more sugar on your frosted flakes make them tastier?