Yea I still don't see how people see any other qb but I'm done debating it really.So Gruden shares my opinion. Nice to know.
It's easy to dismiss, but McNabb was probably a Top 5 QB at his peak. Dak could do worse than a McNabb comparison.
The plus side is that he's not a goofball like McNabb.
It's easy to dismiss, but McNabb was probably a Top 5 QB at his peak. Dak could do worse than a McNabb comparison.
The plus side is that he's not a goofball like McNabb.
It's easy to dismiss, but McNabb was probably a Top 5 QB at his peak. Dak could do worse than a McNabb comparison.
The plus side is that he's not a goofball like McNabb.
Completion percentage is not equal to accuracy though. Besides, McNabb's completion percentage in 1998 (9th in nation) was more impressive than Prescott's mark in 2015 (17th). One of the reasons Dak was a 4th round pick is that he was generally not very accurate on medium and long throws, something that he seems to have improved on in the offseason. We're about to find out if it was a mirage.McNabb comparison out of Syracuse -- not really.
From an accuracy standpoint, Prescott was a much more polished accurate passer at MSU than McNabb's tenure at Syracuse.
McNabb's last year at Syracuse -- 62% completion with 251 attempts.
Prescott's last year at MSU -- 66% completion with 477 attempts.
Also, McNabb had 26 career INT's (938 attempts) at Syraucse, while Prescott had only 23 career INT's at MSU (1169 attempts).
Out of college, Prescott was more accurate, and less turnover-prone than McNabb.
Come on Gruden, think before just fabricating naive observations.
It's easy to dismiss, but McNabb was probably a Top 5 QB at his peak. Dak could do worse than a McNabb comparison.
The plus side is that he's not a goofball like McNabb.
Who eats chunky soup lolOh my god! Dak is a fat alcoholic? This is terrible news.