Completion percentage is not equal to accuracy though. Besides, McNabb's completion percentage in 1998 (9th in nation) was more impressive than Prescott's mark in 2015 (17th). One of the reasons Dak was a 4th round pick is that he was generally not very accurate on medium and long throws, something that he seems to have improved on in the offseason. We're about to find out if it was a mirage.
McNabb was just flat out streaky on all the throws, but managed to become a really good pro despite this.
Steve McNair is a far better example, if we insist on making sure we continue to only compare him to black quarterbacks.
Alex Smith might be a better physical comparison.
That's an insult. McFlabb was an average QB
Nope he wasn't a Cowboy. Sarcasm....LOL.
Average QBs don't go to 5 NFC Title games. Was he an elite QB? Of course not. But he was a very good QB in this league for a stretch.
McNabb comparison out of Syracuse -- not really.
From an accuracy standpoint, Prescott was a much more polished accurate passer at MSU than McNabb's tenure at Syracuse.
McNabb's last year at Syracuse -- 62% completion with 251 attempts.
Prescott's last year at MSU -- 66% completion with 477 attempts.
Also, McNabb had 26 career INT's (938 attempts) at Syraucse, while Prescott had only 23 career INT's at MSU (1169 attempts).
Out of college, Prescott was more accurate, and less turnover-prone than McNabb.
Come on Gruden, think before just fabricating naive observations.
That's an insult. McFlabb was an average QB
Really?The stats sound similar to me.
Really?
Given the importance of the QB position, a QB that is more accurate and complete more passes is equal to a QB who is less accurate and completes less passes?
In a game where one or two passes can determine the outcome for a team, give me the QB that is proven to be more accurate any day of the week.
Even the existence of the smallest percentage difference, is vital in establishing which QB is more likely to be accurate when the game is on the line.
Err, no. Completion percentage is not accuracy. Also did it ever cross your mind that football was played differently in 2015 than in 1998? Modern college QBs throw shorter passes designed to get receivers the ball in space; last century they threw fewer but longer passes and mostly to pick up first downs. Which is why McNabb's completion percentage ranking higher, as well as his yards per attempt being a full yard more than Prescott's, are important details. McNabb was the more accurate QB for his era, which is all you can compare. You can't compare numbers across eras, or Joe Flacco would be better than Roger Staubach.When a QB delivers the ball to the receiver, the receiver catches the ball, a completion occurs -- the premises being presented, the conclusion is the QB was accurate in the deliver of the ball (hence, accuracy).
Based on the numbers, in college Prescott was more accurate than McNabb.
Vince Young anybody?
I see more McNair hope without the women issues
I still see Russell Wilson with better physical talent.