News: DMN: Moore: How next year's running back crop could play into Cowboys' decision at No. 4

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,834
Reaction score
103,558
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
That would be- reasoning why a pick was selected, essentially after it's made
NOT
deliberately choosing to not pick a player/position because next year offers a better crop.
There is a difference. The former is common, reasonable practice. The latter is what doesn't happen and won't ever.

********. It's the same thing, done in the reverse order. You made a claim, it was refuted and shown to be false.

Deal with it.
 

Leadbelly

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,174
Reaction score
1,592
But just wait 'til you see the RBs for 2018!

If we don't feel Elliott is worth picking in '16, not sure why we wouldn't talk ourselves out of taking a RB in RD1 in '17.
 

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,705
Reaction score
60,327
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
But just wait 'til you see the RBs for 2018!

If we don't feel Elliott is worth picking in '16, not sure why we wouldn't talk ourselves out of taking a RB in RD1 in '17.

Moore's point is dumb.

You don't get to draft them all. You pick one. And if Elliott is better than the rest, what difference does it make if you have a whole bunch of backs?
 

Spectre

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,748
Reaction score
522
Bull****. It's the same thing, done in the reverse order. You made a claim, it was refuted and shown to be false.

Deal with it.

It isn't the same at all. Peoples' jobs are on the line, as well as player contracts, each and every season, to win and win now. But it's okay that you're trying to be not dumb.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,834
Reaction score
103,558
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
It isn't the same at all. Peoples' jobs are on the line, as well as player contracts, each and every season, to win and win now. But it's okay that you're trying to be not dumb.

Whatever. Keep believing your own ********. You made an asinine claim, I showed you where it wasn't true. You can't handle it.
 

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,960
Reaction score
26,604
No. They did it because Sam Bradford sucks, and they need to (as quickly as possible) try to get beyond the carnival Chip Kelly created there last year, with something that will restore & reinvigorate the team and fanbase.

They sure paid a guy they think sucks a boat load of money
 
Top