FuzzyLumpkins;1511870 said:
i love this. Its been weeks since the raid and so far no charges have been filed against Vick yet everyone already has the rope out.
It was just last week that Poindexter said charges were gonna be filed (he didn't specify against whom), but that they weren't ready to be filed YET... don't think that this means charges are not gonna be filed...
None of you know the facts of the case.
Well, let's see what facts I have at my command... I'm gonna give you the Reader's Digest version here, but rest assured that I can offer you links to each and every claim made... I have done so in another forum...
Anyway, on to what we know:
1) The Humane Society of the United States had received reports even
before the raid on Vick's house that he was involved in dog fighting... we have quotes from Wayne Pacelle, the President and CEO of the Humane Society, and John Goodwin, who is their resident expert in the area of dog fighting, on that subject... Goodwin raises a good, common sense point, that FEEDING that many dogs would cost 100 bucks a day, and remember, the relatives living there were living there for free, suggesting they wouldn't have been able to afford to fund this operation...
2) Poindexter himself at first said he saw clear signs of dog fighting on the property, now he's singing a different story, claiming there was only one injured dog removed from the property... why is his story changing over time?? We KNOW that he's engaged in a bit of verbal disingenuousness regarding the situation there, saying there was only one dog with RECENT scarring... the reports said there were several dogs that showed signs of OLD scarring...
3) The Virginia Animal Fighting Task Force says they have informants that will place Vick at those fights, and one of those informants has been working for them for some time, and has been characterized as one hundred per cent reliable in past cases... this according to one Kathy Strouse, who is a member of that task force... she was the one who said "one hundred per cent reliable"...
4) Vick claims he was almost never there, employees of a nearby store and its owner said he was in that store with some regularity, buying supplies for the dogs, including syringes... if he was on that property with that kind of regularity, he knows good and well what was going on there... legitimate dog breeders put their dogs up in kennels, they do not stake them out with chains affixed to old car axles buried in the ground... they especially do not NEGLECT their dogs, those dogs are their livelihood... the investigators who saw the scene have no doubt what was going on there, even Poindexter, who has seemingly taken on the role of Vick apologist, has said he saw evidence of a dog fighting operation...
5) A dog fighting expert helping investigators with the case, name of Mark Kumpf, who has seen the evidence, says he saw "bloody carpet, scarred dogs, bite sticks"... he also says he has testified in cases in Virginia where people were convicted on less evidence than the state has at this point...
6) All of this is above and beyond the claims made by Ray Buchanan, about how his teammates knew he was heavy into dog fighting, and the claims made by two anonymous friends of Vick's saying he was there (indeed, they claim that there exists, or once existed, video of him at one of these fights), as reported by Sports Illustrated, and the most recent anonymous informant quoted by ESPN, saying he was VERY big in that "industry"... those are, of course, all unconfirmed rumors, but when the rumors beging to pile up, they begin to take on an appearance of legitimacy... particularly when viewed against the backdrop of points 1 through 5... point 1 is the most damaging, I think, the folks at the Humane Society have no reason to want to bring Vick down if he's NOT involved in dog fighting...
7) Against all that evidence, all we have to suggest innocence is Michael Vick's word that he didn't know what was going on down there on HIS property, honest... that's certainly a compelling rebuttal...
Yeah, when I read all that, I'm inclined to judge Ron Mexico guilty of engaging in dog fighting... I reckon his lawyers wouldn't want me sitting on his jury, LOL...
Now, you got anything to offer that even hints at his innocence in this??