DMN: Sabin: How Tony Romo's contract is getting in way of QB's desire to win now

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
Sabin: How Tony Romo's contract is getting in way of QB's desire to win now

Follow @RainerSabinDMN rsabin@***BANNED-URL***
Staff Writer

Published: 14 March 2015 06:20 PM
Updated: 15 March 2015 12:34 AM

Below the Texas Rangers cap he was wearing, an expression of disappointment and resignation was etched on Tony Romo’s face.

Approximately 2,200 miles from Surprise, Ariz., where Romo popped up at spring training, his good friend, DeMarco Murray, was about to become his former teammate by signing a five-year, $42 million contract with the Philadelphia Eagles.

It was a sobering turn of events for the Cowboys and their quarterback, who bid farewell to the reigning NFL rushing champion and offensive player of the year.

“Obviously, it’s not an ideal situation,” Romo lamented.

It was a predictable reaction from a player who will turn 35 next month and knows time is running out in his quest to win a championship. At the site of Super Bowl XLIX in February, while riding on the Cowboys’ plush bus, Romo made that point to owner Jerry Jones as he sold him on the idea of making the necessary investments to win now.

That’s easier said than done with the budget constraints imposed by the NFL. Ironically, Romo’s 2015 salary-cap number of $27.8 million, the highest in the league, has been a major obstacle in the Cowboys’ ability to actualize the kind of go-for-broke plan the quarterback was pitching to Jones.

Team officials have expressed reluctance about restructuring Romo’s contract to lower that gargantuan figure because it would only create more financial burdens in the future. This fiscally responsible philosophy has governed the way the Cowboys have operated in free agency since the new league year began Tuesday.

As other teams acquired players in bulk, Dallas took a passive approach while watching its competitors poach six former Cowboys: Murray, defensive lineman Henry Melton, receiver Dwayne Harris, right tackle Jermey Parnell and linebackers Bruce Carter and Justin Durant.

Together, their contracts could total as much as $127.8 million — the inflated price attached to the success the Cowboys achieved last season, when they went 12-4 and made the divisional round of the playoffs.

But that sum was money the Cowboys weren’t going to spend on veterans less valuable than the roster’s younger talent, a group expected to command bigger dollars in the future. So, Dallas stayed thrifty.

The Cowboys acquired four players: running back Darren McFadden, linebacker Jasper Brinkley and two fullbacks, Jed Collins and Ray Agnew. McFadden, the most notable addition, agreed to a two-year deal worth as much as $5.85 million with a signing bonus of $200,000 — a meager amount that invites minimal risk.

“At the end of the day, this is about finding the best way to collectively fit all of the individual pieces together, in terms of talent, offensive players, defensive players and dollars — under the salary-cap structure — that gives you the best chance to have a championship team,” Jones said in a statement last week.

It’s not an easy puzzle to cobble together. As of Saturday, the Cowboys were $8.8 million under the NFL-mandated payroll ceiling with plenty of work left to replenish a roster that has holes on the defensive line, at cornerback and in the offensive backfield, where Murray once stood.

That’s not much available space, which is why it’s interesting that the Cowboys haven’t restructured Romo’s contract to create as much as $12.8 million in cap room for 2015. When Romo was signed to a six-year deal in March 2013, it seemed the Cowboys had designs on making a serious run at the Super Bowl by 2015.

Maximizing Romo’s talent at an age when he could still perform at an elite level became an organizational priority. In light of the Cowboys’ surprising run last season, it seemed it would remain one. But now the Cowboys appear unwilling to realize that goal at the expense of financial stability and long-term health of the club.

“The question just becomes strategy,” executive vice president Stephen Jones said recently. “Do you want to push money out in order to have money now? Sometimes that hasn’t necessarily worked great for us.”

So the Cowboys have taken a different tack. It’s why the Cowboys let Murray walk after he helped ease the burden for Romo during a season when the quarterback played better than ever. It’s why they haven’t been big players in free agency. And it’s why they have yet to shave Romo’s enormous cap number.

“We have to trust in the process and the people making decisions,” Romo said.

As Romo lugubriously reflected on the loss of Murray, it’s uncertain if he may have felt partially responsible for the running back’s departure.

The burden of Romo’s contract, after all, has created the quarterback’s own, twisted Catch-22. The same money the Cowboys gave him to lead them to glory at this juncture of his career also has made it more challenging to put together the team most capable of doing so.

Oh, the irony.

http://www.***BANNED-URL***/sports/...-getting-in-way-of-qb-s-desire-to-win-now.ece
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
Pushing money out for Romo at the end of his career (3-5 years left) is not the best idea. This way is the best long term way to build a long lasting contender and stay off the roller coaster. It requires patience.

I don't have any left these days.
 

perrykemp

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,503
Reaction score
9,274
What I find interesting is the compare and contrast of Stephen Jone's comments about it not being ideal restructuring players and pushing money into the future vs a lot of the analysis / comments here on CZ by posters I respect quite a bit re: the NFL salary cap doesn't mean anything, that the Cowboys can sign anybody they want anytime they want, and that pushing money into future year by heavily utilizing restructures is the RIGHT WAY to handle the NFL salary cap -- ie 0% loans, etc, etc.
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
What I find interesting is the compare and contrast of Stephen Jone's comments about it not being ideal restructuring players and pushing money into the future vs a lot of the analysis / comments here on CZ by posters I respect quite a bit re: the NFL salary cap doesn't mean anything, that the Cowboys can sign anybody they want anytime they want, and that pushing money into future year by heavily utilizing restructures is the RIGHT WAY to handle the NFL salary cap -- ie 0% loans, etc, etc.

And plenty more feel differently about kicking the money can down the road.
 

Reality

Staff member
Messages
31,232
Reaction score
72,775
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I think there are two reasons the Cowboys have not restructured Romo's contract. I think they realize he is nearing the end of his career and because they have a very young team overall, they want to make sure the team is not hamstrung post-Romo with the salary cap. The other reason is I think Romo's contract is their emergency fund if they lose a high value player to injury, especially Romo. With Romo's back being so iffy last season, it makes sense to keep that salary cap space reworkable if they have to make a trade with another team and need to be able to absorb a large cap hit from that player's salary.

Just like most players, I'm sure Romo would have been very willing to restructure his contract, but also just like most players, a restructure only changes the payment terms and gives him more upfront money rather than it meaning he will take less money. I can't blame him or anyone else, but the Cowboys are finally running the team with their minds, not their emotion, as evident with Ware and now Murray. Time will tell if it was a good decision with Murray, but losing Ware and Hatcher last year turned out to be less of a bad thing than most people expected.
 

lwehlers

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,631
Reaction score
2,738
well Stephen jones does not agree with pushing money back into the future and wants to try and win with what available cap money he has now.
 

perrykemp

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,503
Reaction score
9,274
And plenty more feel differently about kicking the money can down the road.

I'm pragmatic about it Jobberone -- just like there are all sorts of strategies to roster building that can be successful there are all sorts of strategies for salary cap management.

The Ravens won a Superbowl by pushing money, restructuring, etc... They had to have a mini fire-sale the offseason after they won the Superbowl and that set them back at least 1-2 years.

The Packers take the ultimate example as a "pay as a you go" approach to salary cap management where they pretty much never restructure players and they won a Superbowl.

In general I am in favor of the "Pay as you go strategy", however, with Romo potentially nearing the end of the line I wonder if the Cowboy's unique circumstances sorta point to 2015 being the best chance for the Cowboys to win the Superbowl given Romo (and Witten's) age and that restructuring might be a good strategy.

For whatever reason the Cowboys seems to be morphing into a 'Pay as you go' club'. In theory I like it but I find the timing odd.
 

visionary

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,448
Reaction score
33,407
What I find interesting is the compare and contrast of Stephen Jone's comments about it not being ideal restructuring players and pushing money into the future vs a lot of the analysis / comments here on CZ by posters I respect quite a bit re: the NFL salary cap doesn't mean anything, that the Cowboys can sign anybody they want anytime they want, and that pushing money into future year by heavily utilizing restructures is the RIGHT WAY to handle the NFL salary cap -- ie 0% loans, etc, etc.

Stephen used to say the same until last year
CZ homers just used to parrot what he said and haven't quite caught up yet
 

BlindFaith

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,113
Reaction score
2,624
What I find interesting is the compare and contrast of Stephen Jone's comments about it not being ideal restructuring players and pushing money into the future vs a lot of the analysis / comments here on CZ by posters I respect quite a bit re: the NFL salary cap doesn't mean anything, that the Cowboys can sign anybody they want anytime they want, and that pushing money into future year by heavily utilizing restructures is the RIGHT WAY to handle the NFL salary cap -- ie 0% loans, etc, etc.

Hmm, I'd go with the guy who does it for a living and was a first hand witness to the push it forward philosophy that netted us nothing. Simple choice actually.
 

Staubacher

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,315
Reaction score
23,740
How are we not winning now? 13-5 last year. We will likely be as good or better this year. Romo's offense is loaded.

Murray was not the difference between us being good or bad. And he won't be this year.

Romo went out and earned that big dollar by playing lights out despite all the injuries. He has stayed the course and actually improved his game while waiting for the team around him to first get an Oline and hopefully soon a real defense.

Sabin = Drama Queen
 

Bigdog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,859
Reaction score
11,511
Does anyone know how much we will have understood bathe cap next year if we don't restructure Romo's contract?
 

Craig

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,651
Reaction score
1,910
Id be open to pushing cap numbers down the road if it were for something huge, but im not interested in moving romos cap money down the road till its necessary. The team is being constructed the right way now, no need to mess around unless there is something perfect staring you in the face.
 

foofighters

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,458
Reaction score
7,155
Pushing money out for Romo at the end of his career (3-5 years left) is not the best idea. This way is the best long term way to build a long lasting contender and stay off the roller coaster. It requires patience.

I don't have any left these days.

lol, I love the poorly disguised Romo hate threads. If Romo ever wins a Super Bowl, I expect a long line of people like you saying, "Ya, but..."
 

Toruk_Makto

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,242
Reaction score
17,336
We restructured Tyron.

And they will restructure Tony if it makes sense.

Not restructuring Tony (now) doesn't mean we no longer believe in the idea of restructuring.

Let's not be obtuse guys.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
:facepalm: Not this crap again. Hey Tony, please take less money so other players can make top money instead...

And why do people still think the cap is why we let Murray go?

The cap is the reason. Jerry Jones stated it plain and simple, fitting what is best under the salary cap structure. I guess it is easier to pretend that constructs like "plan" or assume that Murray just really was not that good helps with the coping process.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
How are we not winning now? 13-5 last year. We will likely be as good or better this year. Romo's offense is loaded.
This should not be Romo's offense. It should be the offense that got 13-5 last year and that was everyone's offense, not just one player.
 
Top