No. UDFA if then. His measurables are miserable.
At this point, with Michael Sam basically in free fall with regards to his original draft stock of a 3rd-5th rounder, do you throw one of our 7ths at him if he's still there?
why not he's better than Hitchens or Kitchens whatever his name was
If Sam has no home at LB due to a lack of athletic ability, being a tweener, but if his best game is putting his hand in the dirt and rushing the QB, and since everyone says he has a great motor, if he's still there, should Cowboys take a flier on him in round 7?
Can he provide depth at DE in pass situations?
Can he play special teams?
Can the defensive player of the year in the SCC defy his own measurables and contribute to an NFL team?
If the answer to any of those questions is yes, I think the Cowboys should give him a shot. Plenty of players with heart have proven the NFL GMs wrong, and player of the year in the conference that defines defense has to stand for something.....doesn't it?
I don't see why you wouldn't draft the SEC Defensive Player of the Year in the 7th round when you had the worst defense in franchise history the year before. Even if the guy can be a situational pass rusher, that's better than nothing. I'd definitely take him.
I don't see why you wouldn't draft the SEC Defensive Player of the Year in the 7th round when you had the worst defense in franchise history the year before. Even if the guy can be a situational pass rusher, that's better than nothing. I'd definitely take him.
I don't see why you wouldn't draft the SEC Defensive Player of the Year in the 7th round when you had the worst defense in franchise history the year before. Even if the guy can be a situational pass rusher, that's better than nothing. I'd definitely take him.