dbair1967;1790699 said:absolutely a finesse team..their receivers hate contact and their OL doesnt push anybody around...defensively they have some good blitz packages, but they allow run lanes to open and play soft in the secondary
their offense has been the same for weeks...they have so much confidence in their passing game they dont fill the need to do much else, and I think its starting to catch up with them...they (entire team) got punched in the face last night
David
theebs;1790708 said:Well I strongly disagree. I wouldnt be suprised to see them come out in one of the next two weeks and pound the ball on someone just to put it on film before the playoffs.
WHen I think of their team, finesse is one of the last things that comes to mind.
It should also be obvious, just from watching the games, that our blitzes are more effective. I'd expect them to improve next year as well.superpunk;1790692 said:Beats me.
It's pretty obvious that we blitz MORE - much more - whether they have a higher success pct., I couldn't say for sure.
YoMick;1790700 said:THIS current Cowboy team will have been together for 18 games if we play them in SB(as opposed to just 6).
I believe we have a GREAT shot. If you pressure Brady and Moss they are taken out of their game. So far the problem is... opposing teams cant finish what they start against the Pats.
Feeley could have methodically drove down the field and ate up the clock and scored and won the game. He stopped taking what they gave him. He went for what was never there... AND LOST.
Romo wont do that.
Perception is a funny thing. Every once in a while we really nail one and all of a sudden Bradie James is coming free. I don't think it's outside of the realm of possibility that is just "appears" more effective because we do it more.theogt;1790718 said:It should also be obvious, just from watching the games, that our blitzes are more effective. I'd expect them to improve next year as well.
dbair1967;1790715 said:yeah, maybe they can run on the Jets
regardless, if the weather gets bad up there in January they are probably going to be limited in terms of their passing game...they would have a hard time beating Indy or Pittsburgh if their huge edge in the passing game becomes negated...same thing with Green Bay, though GB plays more physical on both sides of the ball when compared to New England
David
theogt;1790718 said:It should also be obvious, just from watching the games, that our blitzes are more effective. I'd expect them to improve next year as well.
Those complaints were a daily ritual with Zimmer around. This is the first I've seen of it since. Could be because it's less of a problem now.superpunk;1790723 said:Perception is a funny thing. Every once in a while we really nail one and all of a sudden Bradie James is coming free. I don't think it's outside of the realm of possibility that is just "appears" more effective because we do it more.
Either way, the results are good. I was addressing the everyone rush and run into each other aspect that complaints never ceased about due to Zimmer, and that clearly continue today. Not on whether our blitzes are in general more effective this year than last.
Bach;1790706 said:I have doubts. Our pass defense is weak.
Still want to get another shot at them though.
theebs;1790726 said:So you think if the game is close and the wind is blowing and the ball is frozen they can not put two tight ends on the field and pound the football and throw it short to the tight end?
I believe they can run on anyone. They lost morris and maroney is suffering from some minor injury for the millionth time.
I happen to think Tom Brady is one of the toughest players in the league and he is their quarterback and sets the tone.
I think their defense is old and slow, but I do not see any team in the league going to their place regardless of the weather and scoring on them at will.
Again, that is what is most impressive to me about them, they can play any style of football they want and they excel at all of them. If you think they are soft because they dont run the ball that is fine, dont be confused by that meaning they cant run the ball.
Nobody will beat them in Foxborough, I am pretty sure of that.
Chocolate Lab;1790724 said:I'm more with David. When you think of the Pats, you think of the big, strong, Parcells-style players on both sides of the ball and running the ball in bad weather. At least I do. But this year they throw so much, it's hard to not call them a finesse team.
IMO you've bought in to the hype a little bit, theebs. No team is equally great at everything. Their best players are certainly Moss, Welker, and especially Tom Brady, so they're going to be better throwing it. Any team would love them to try to prove that they can beat you with Maroney and Heath Evans just to make a point.
But last night more than anything, I think the message was that they aren't unbeatable. All these 30 point wins had fans and I'm sure even some opponents thinking they didn't have a chance. Last night showed that they do. And that's hugely important.
khiladi;1790786 said:Everybody is talking like the Patriots and Cowboys are destined to meet in the Super Bowl... talk about getting ahead of yourself... there is a lot of football to be played...
theebs;1790660 said:You have to remember they can lineup in jumbo sets and play smash mouth football also.
That is what is most impressive to me about them, they can approach every game about 5 ways and be successfull. Last night they decided to see if the eagles could cover a 4 wide look all night. The eagles did a good job and the pats still put 30 on the board.
I bet if the eagles and pats played again today and the pats decided to run the ball and play power football they would blow them out.
Again though, the pats versatility is what is most impressive to me about them, they will beat you equally as bad about 5 different ways. It must be virtually impossible to prepare for them.