Reverend Conehead
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,953
- Reaction score
- 11,862
I agree totally. There was never anything wrong with Playboy as it was. It offered quality nude photos of women. There's nothing wrong with a man enjoying those. Today's fanatical PC mind police doesn't like that kind of thing, but they're a bunch of whiny Karens. I would have a problem with Playboy if they had forced women to pose nude, but they never did that. It was consensual every single time. I had a subscription at one time. Now that you mention it, I miss it.Oh...I know! Err, what I mean is, I've heard that about the internet!
Seriously though, Playboy photos were always much better than what you find on the net. They were artistically done, by an actual photographer who knew what he was doing. Also, it may sound cliche, but the articles, reviews, etc., were second to none. That may have continued to be the case after they changed the format, but the whole change seemed to either be pandering to the whims of the repressed, or the new boss (Hef's daughter?) doing things the way they preferred. Whatever the case, it cheapened the product.
...
Another magazine I once subscribed to was Mad. I even subscribed to the German language one when I lived in Germany. It helped me to improve my language skills a lot because it was funny, and that made you remember more. I'm super bummed that Mad is no longer published. I wanted to subscribe to an edgier French magazine similar to Mad named Fluide Glacial. It's naughtier. It's more like National Lampoon. However, a subscription here in the US would be cost prohibitive. It was something like $160 for a year to have it mailed from France to the US. That's just too much money. Instead, I found someone from Quebec on E-Bay selling back issues for a lot less money. So I went for a few of those. Maybe at some point I'll just bite the bullet and subscribe to Fluide Glacial. It's hilarious.