Does Duckett Create Logjam for Commanders?

Gryphon

Merge Ahead
Messages
3,407
Reaction score
31
By JOSEPH WHITE
AP Sports Writer

ASHBURN, Va. (AP) -- T.J. Duckett crashed the Washington Commanders running back party Wednesday, arriving as part of a three-team trade that surprised his new teammates and raised plenty of questions.

Is there more to Clinton Portis' injury than the Commanders are letting on? Have they given up on Ladell Betts? Is Betts on the trading block? Is Rock Cartwright still paying the price for a costly fumble last year?

"I don't understand it," said Betts, who had seemed to be secure as the No. 2 back behind Portis. "But it's a business, and it is what it is."

Duckett took his physical Wednesday morning, but coach Joe Gibbs was waiting for the trade to become official before announcing it or commenting on it. Duckett, who led Atlanta with eight rushing touchdowns last year on only 380 yards, was acquired from the Falcons in a deal that sent receiver Ashley Lelie from Denver to Atlanta and a draft pick from the Commanders to the Broncos.

Washington will give Denver the equivalent value of a 2007 third-round selection, based on a points system used by NFL teams. The arrangement opens the door for multiple alternatives involving the teams' picks - they could swap picks in the first round, for example - but the exact compensation won't be determined until next offseason.

The unloading of another draft pick reinforces the Commanders' win-now mission in the third year of Gibbs' comeback from retirement..

Still, running back was near the bottom of any Commanders prospective shopping list when training camp opened 3 1/2 weeks ago. Portis ran for 1,516 yards last year, Betts was considered a back who could start for many other teams, and the compact Cartwright could be expected to pound a carry or two in short yardage.

But Portis partially dislocated his shoulder making a tackle following an interception in the preseason opener against Cincinnati. He might not be ready for the Sept. 11 regular season opener against Minnesota.

Betts, meanwhile, missed the Cincinnati game and several days of practice with a nagging hamstring injury. It's nothing major, but it adds questions about his durability. Betts broke his arm in 2003 and missed seven games, and he sat out four last year with a sprained knee.

Betts has been the subject of trade rumors, so Duckett's arrival could portend his departure.

Then there's Cartwright, who expected to get carries as a short-yardage back this season, the very role in which Duckett excels. Cartwright, whose solid season last year was marred by a costly fumble against Kansas City, said he was shocked by the trade.

"It's kind of like a slap in the face, but it's a business," Cartwright said. "They had to do a business deal, and that's the way they wanted to go."

Portis was more diplomatic, although he rebuffed a suggestion that Duckett's bruising style would complement Portis' more flashy runs.

"I'm a bruiser, too," Portis said. "Having a bigger back come in for myself, Ladell and Rock means more competition for all of us. We are going to have to step our level of play up, and it is going to be the toughest guy on the field."
 

Billy Bullocks

Active Member
Messages
4,098
Reaction score
22
As a Cowboys fan, the only negative I see out of this for the Skins is the loss of their 3rd rounder...

They got a guy who is capable of being a considerable part of a teams running game. He can start in a pinch.

Portis isn't the biggest back, probably not a bad idea to get a guy who can spell him...especially with Betts and his hammy issues.
 

Bizwah

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,158
Reaction score
3,877
Seriously, this helps the Skins from a talent stand point. Duckett is a good player.

What I don't understand is why......

I mean, they have good runners is Portis, Betts, and Cartwright. Sure Portis is dinged up, but according to most reports I've read, he'll be ready for the season. Betts is a solid backup and he's played well when asked to. Cartwright is a solid third RB. He can play RB and FB in a pinch.

The Commanders sorely lack depth along the OL, LB, and can use some youth on defense. Wouldn't the third round pick have been better served being traded for something along those lines? I mean, I know they hate the draft, but at least you can address more serious concerns if you want to trade.

Just curious......
 

MossBurner

New Member
Messages
505
Reaction score
0
Betts will be traded. He has value and is in the last year of his contract. Hopefully for an OT.

Rock will stay as he is the special teams captain and backup RB/FB.

Duckett's role will be backup RB, goal-line back, 3rd and 2 back. He's going to get ~10 carries a game to take the load off of Portis. KC always had 2 solid backs that shared the load and the hits.
 

DragonCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,498
Reaction score
250
Billy Bullocks said:
As a Cowboys fan, the only negative I see out of this for the Skins is the loss of their 3rd rounder...

It's not like they'd do anything with it...:D
 

Bizwah

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,158
Reaction score
3,877
MossBurner said:
Betts will be traded. He has value and is in the last year of his contract. Hopefully for an OT.

Rock will stay as he is the special teams captain and backup RB/FB.

Duckett's role will be backup RB, goal-line back, 3rd and 2 back. He's going to get ~10 carries a game to take the load off of Portis. KC always had 2 solid backs that shared the load and the hits.

Any OT you'll trade for will be servicable at best....so, you probably won't get much help.

OTs are a commodity. It's difficult to even acquire solid depth....believe me we tried. Several articles have been posted here about how 10 top teams are desparate to upgrade at OT....

But then again, Snyder still has a first round pick to squander. I guess he can give that up along with Betts and acquire a decent OL.
 

skinsngibbs4life

Active Member
Messages
1,383
Reaction score
0
Bizwah said:
Any OT you'll trade for will be servicable at best....so, you probably won't get much help.

OTs are a commodity. It's difficult to even acquire solid depth....believe me we tried. Several articles have been posted here about how 10 top teams are desparate to upgrade at OT....

But then again, Snyder still has a first round pick to squander. I guess he can give that up along with Betts and acquire a decent OL.

I just dont see why, if they were really looking to shop around the 3rd and 4th, they wouldnt go out for a secondary guy, LB, or offensive lineman.

Rb, in my opinion, was already a pretty deep position on our team before the trade. But I guess this trade just shows how much of an influence Saunders really has on this team. you know he was the one really pushing for this deal.
 

Bizwah

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,158
Reaction score
3,877
skinsngibbs4life said:
I just dont see why, if they were really looking to shop around the 3rd and 4th, they wouldnt go out for a secondary guy, LB, or offensive lineman.

Rb, in my opinion, was already a pretty deep position on our team before the trade. But I guess this trade just shows how much of an influence Saunders really has on this team. you know he was the one really pushing for this deal.

Yeah, I just don't see the logic.
 

RiggoForever

Benched
Messages
875
Reaction score
0
I don't get it either, particularly when we have 6'3 270 lb Mike Sellers who has showed he can run the ball in preseason.

We seriously need a real GM.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
RiggoForever said:
I don't get it either, particularly when we have 6'3 270 lb Mike Sellers who has showed he can run the ball in preseason.

We seriously need a real GM.
Wow.

I got nothing else. Just wow.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
MossBurner said:
Betts will be traded. He has value and is in the last year of his contract. Hopefully for an OT.

I seriously doubt you'll get much for Betts, he's even less proven, and probably less regarded a back than Duckett is
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
summerisfunner said:
I seriously doubt you'll get much for Betts, he's even less proven, and probably less regarded a back than Duckett is
No one will trade for Betts. That's a pipe dream.
 

RiggoForever

Benched
Messages
875
Reaction score
0
Hostile said:
Wow.

I got nothing else. Just wow.

Sellers averaged like 6 yards a carry during preseason...and he's an ox that literally runs over safeties like Brian Dawkins. I don't see what need TJ Duckett fills.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
Hostile said:
No one will trade for Betts. That's a pipe dream.

true, but Hos, you're knowledgeable, why, WHY are the Skins, at least, going to be giving up a 3rd and 4th for this guy?!! the NFL's best rushing team from a year ago has been trying a long time to get rid of him

I need answers, this is vexing the hell out of me
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
RiggoForever said:
Sellers averaged like 6 yards a carry during preseason...and he's an ox that literally runs over safeties like Brian Dawkins. I don't see what need TJ Duckett fills.
If Portis is gone for any length of time he can be the #1 back until he comes back.

But you still paid WAY too much.
 

RiggoForever

Benched
Messages
875
Reaction score
0
Hostile said:
If Portis is gone for any length of time he can be the #1 back until he comes back.

But you still paid WAY too much.

I feel bad for Betts. Saunders extolled praise on him but I don't see how he can see this as anything but a slap in the face.

Betts is no Portis but TJ Duckett isn't either.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
Hostile said:
If Portis is gone for any length of time he can be the #1 back until he comes back.

But you still paid WAY too much.

the NFL's best rushing team from a year ago didn't want him...as a backup!! he got beat out by a pint-sized rookie!! I need answers!! by God
 
Top